Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr McCullough: Myocarditis now running at 25,000 per million and we're still relatively early days. Pre Covid it was 4 in a million.
Peter’s Newsletter ^ | Jan 6, 2023 | Peter Halligan

Posted on 01/07/2023 4:37:17 PM PST by george76

Dr Peter McCullough explains that latest analysis shows Myocarditis now running at 25,000 per million and we're still relatively early days.

Pre Covid it was 4 in a million.

When will Congress and the American people listen to global experts at the top of their field.

TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND CASES PER MILLION - in unvaxxed times it was just FOUR PER MILLION


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: alltheshotshills; covid; frfakecovidiandocs; mccullough; mrnavaccine; myocarditis; notvax; quackery; sameolretreads; tgtrolltrolling; vax; vaxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last
To: wjcsux; Bikkuri
It looks like all of the Branch Covidians showed up this evening.

They’re here in droves. I wonder if BiteMe’s New Years push for “the vaccine” last week got them all ramped up again?

241 posted on 01/08/2023 7:28:58 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: metmom
You omitted,

Deliberately injecting myself with a substance know to have that as a side effect with no legal recourse for medical liability I can help.

Fixed. ;-). Can’t forget that very important factor which obviously maintains the promotion of these jabs and serves as resistance to studies of their effects.

242 posted on 01/08/2023 7:30:22 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Oh, but there is such a study, a study that compares myocarditis in the vaccinated and in those who have had COVID.

It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.

3rd “during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available” Why not just name the 12 month period? Could it be that the data was collected so long ago that it is no longer statistically significant? And why is the American Heart Association relying on outdated foreign metadata?

This is an outdated worthless metadata supported piece of gobblygoo published to confuse people and the issues with no links to the actual study that supposedly shows something that actually does not.

243 posted on 01/08/2023 7:41:26 AM PST by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Oh, a FRurse, my apologies.

I love how you vaxx pushers stick together, it’s heartwarming, or in your case, myocarditis inducing.

I wasn’t linking the vaccine or even the virus to anything.

Your esteemed colleague super MD gas_dr was trivializing myocarditis; both of you (or the troll that posts using your accounts) should know better.The pre-pandemic consensus on myocarditis was clear; myocarditis was bad, and it could to heart failure.

By the way, since when do literature reviews have to be “vetted”? Literature reviews summarize peer-reviewed “ vetted” literature.

Funny how you mispell just like gas-dr does...hmmm


244 posted on 01/08/2023 7:46:27 AM PST by RonaldusMagnus-DonaldusMagnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

logi_cal869 wrote:

- “You omitted, Deliberately injecting myself with a substance know to have that as a side effect with no legal recourse for medical liability I can help.”

- “Fixed. ;-). Can’t forget that very important factor which obviously maintains the promotion of these jabs and serves as resistance to studies of their effects.”

You omitted that ALL vaccines are protected from legal recourse by the PREP Act. The anti-vaxxers are wrong when the claim the COVID vaccines have this unique protection.


245 posted on 01/08/2023 7:52:24 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
There was a link off that page to the study here: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970

I note the study period is from December 1 2020 to December 15 2021. Kind of AVOIDING the very obvious approach of just comparing total rates of myocarditis before covid-19, during covid-19 and before jabs, and after jabs.

Study seems like narrative defending not truth seeking.

246 posted on 01/08/2023 7:53:27 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

fireman15 wrote: “It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.”

The details are in the link embedded in the second paragraph of the article. Click on ‘detailed analysis’. Come back after you’ve read the study.


247 posted on 01/08/2023 7:56:03 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I e known several people who had China virus, early on…..none who’ve been jabbed….and, none who’ve had any heart issues, since.

Not to say they won’t develop any, but, as it relates to China virus….the odds of it occurring would seem to be growing slimmer.

Dr McCullough said (in an interview, last year ?) that the spike proteins from the $hots are much worse than from the virus.

Who knows, now, with all of the jab-escaped variants? I’d think it remains true. No idea. Too bad we can’t get any legitimate studies, done, here.


248 posted on 01/08/2023 7:57:04 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 of day. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

AndyTheBear wrote: “So I am impressed only by those studies that are meant to figure out what is actually true. The FIRST thing such a study would do is compare rates between three different times. Before covid 19. During covid 19 but before jabs. After covid 19 with jabs. The only reason to AVOID this easy amd blatantly obvious approach is if one does not want to determine what is true but instead is doing propaganda to rationalize a failed hypothesis that those funding the study want pushed.”

If the question is whether COVID causes more instances than the vaccine, there is no reason to compile data before COVID and before the vaccines. And, that is exactly what this study does when it compares those cases of vaccinated and unvaccinated.


249 posted on 01/08/2023 7:59:20 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Throwing out “racism” word is just a coverup for incompetence.


250 posted on 01/08/2023 8:05:52 AM PST by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Come back after you've read the study.

Sorry I missed the link... to the "analysis" of the study. As I suspected it is comprised completely of outdated cherry picked data selected specifically to support a misleading narrative. It has absolutely zero credibility and was meant only to confuse the easily and willfully confused.

You come back after a couple years and multiple more boosters and let us know how it has worked out for you and those exposed to the dangerous spike proteins that you are shedding.

251 posted on 01/08/2023 8:16:42 AM PST by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; Jane Long; Allegra
"Throwing out “racism” word is just a coverup for incompetence."


You actually want me to go back and find the posts you made that called us (white Americans) inferior to you?
Hopefully someone else bookmarked it since I didn't think to... but I can and will go back and find your post if necessary, and yes, it was racist.
252 posted on 01/08/2023 8:31:44 AM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: metmom
metmom, pinging you too, hoping you bookmarked entropy12s racist posts from a couple of months ago...

I should have pinged you to THIS post, but it slipped my mind.

(sorry to bug you ;^))
253 posted on 01/08/2023 8:35:34 AM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
If the question is whether COVID causes more instances than the vaccine, there is no reason to compile data before COVID

Absolute nonsense. There is not only reason its the easiest most obvious way to check how much covid-19 was responsible for the condition.

You have a problem sir. Either you are hopelessly biased beyond reason or you are are really stupid.

254 posted on 01/08/2023 8:36:25 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux; Allegra
"It looks like all of the Branch Covidians showed up this evening."


Darn.. I thought they were hibernating.. so much for that :P

It's ok, I guess they like all of the attention they are getting while looking stupid at the same time.
(clown-show with clowns that obviously don't care for other's lives)
255 posted on 01/08/2023 8:38:23 AM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

fireman15 wrote: “Sorry I missed the link... to the “analysis” of the study. As I suspected it is comprised completely of outdated cherry picked data selected specifically to support a misleading narrative. It has absolutely zero credibility and was meant only to confuse the easily and willfully confused.”

So, a study that “analyzed records from England’s National Immunization database for nearly 43 million people 13 or older who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine between Dec. 1, 2020 and Dec. 15, 2021. myocarditis.” is guilty of ‘cherry-picking’ the data?

BTW, you might want to read this article:

“People vaccinated against COVID-19 cannot ‘shed’ spike proteins to harm anyone.” “Claims about COVID-19 vaccine shedding began spreading in April and have been debunked many times.”

https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/people-vaccinated-against-covid-19-cannot-shed-spike-proteins-to-harm-anyone/


256 posted on 01/08/2023 8:55:32 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

AndyTheBear wrote: “There is not only reason its the easiest most obvious way to check how much covid-19 was responsible for the condition.”

Comparing the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is a more obvious way to determine if vaccination or the virus is cause. Data from before COVID and the vaccines cannot do that.

AndyTheBear wrote: “You have a problem sir. Either you are hopelessly biased beyond reason or you are are really stupid.”

I won’t call you stupid but I will call you hopelessly biased beyond reason.


257 posted on 01/08/2023 8:58:54 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
I won’t call you stupid but I will call you hopelessly biased beyond reason.

Call me whatever you want. Your words are empty.

258 posted on 01/08/2023 9:01:16 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
“People vaccinated against COVID-19 cannot ‘shed’ spike proteins to harm anyone.”

Yeah right! The damage being done by the vaccinated and boosted shedding massive amounts of spike proteins to those around them as compared to the unvaccinated, are just starting to be realized.

259 posted on 01/08/2023 9:23:16 AM PST by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Ridiculous.


260 posted on 01/08/2023 9:26:49 AM PST by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson