Posted on 01/07/2023 4:37:17 PM PST by george76
Dr Peter McCullough explains that latest analysis shows Myocarditis now running at 25,000 per million and we're still relatively early days.
Pre Covid it was 4 in a million.
When will Congress and the American people listen to global experts at the top of their field.
TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND CASES PER MILLION - in unvaxxed times it was just FOUR PER MILLION
They’re here in droves. I wonder if BiteMe’s New Years push for “the vaccine” last week got them all ramped up again?
Deliberately injecting myself with a substance know to have that as a side effect with no legal recourse for medical liability I can help.
Fixed. ;-). Can’t forget that very important factor which obviously maintains the promotion of these jabs and serves as resistance to studies of their effects.
It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.
3rd “during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available” Why not just name the 12 month period? Could it be that the data was collected so long ago that it is no longer statistically significant? And why is the American Heart Association relying on outdated foreign metadata?
This is an outdated worthless metadata supported piece of gobblygoo published to confuse people and the issues with no links to the actual study that supposedly shows something that actually does not.
Oh, a FRurse, my apologies.
I love how you vaxx pushers stick together, it’s heartwarming, or in your case, myocarditis inducing.
I wasn’t linking the vaccine or even the virus to anything.
Your esteemed colleague super MD gas_dr was trivializing myocarditis; both of you (or the troll that posts using your accounts) should know better.The pre-pandemic consensus on myocarditis was clear; myocarditis was bad, and it could to heart failure.
By the way, since when do literature reviews have to be “vetted”? Literature reviews summarize peer-reviewed “ vetted” literature.
Funny how you mispell just like gas-dr does...hmmm
logi_cal869 wrote:
- “You omitted, Deliberately injecting myself with a substance know to have that as a side effect with no legal recourse for medical liability I can help.”
- “Fixed. ;-). Can’t forget that very important factor which obviously maintains the promotion of these jabs and serves as resistance to studies of their effects.”
You omitted that ALL vaccines are protected from legal recourse by the PREP Act. The anti-vaxxers are wrong when the claim the COVID vaccines have this unique protection.
I note the study period is from December 1 2020 to December 15 2021. Kind of AVOIDING the very obvious approach of just comparing total rates of myocarditis before covid-19, during covid-19 and before jabs, and after jabs.
Study seems like narrative defending not truth seeking.
fireman15 wrote: “It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.”
The details are in the link embedded in the second paragraph of the article. Click on ‘detailed analysis’. Come back after you’ve read the study.
I e known several people who had China virus, early on…..none who’ve been jabbed….and, none who’ve had any heart issues, since.
Not to say they won’t develop any, but, as it relates to China virus….the odds of it occurring would seem to be growing slimmer.
Dr McCullough said (in an interview, last year ?) that the spike proteins from the $hots are much worse than from the virus.
Who knows, now, with all of the jab-escaped variants? I’d think it remains true. No idea. Too bad we can’t get any legitimate studies, done, here.
AndyTheBear wrote: “So I am impressed only by those studies that are meant to figure out what is actually true. The FIRST thing such a study would do is compare rates between three different times. Before covid 19. During covid 19 but before jabs. After covid 19 with jabs. The only reason to AVOID this easy amd blatantly obvious approach is if one does not want to determine what is true but instead is doing propaganda to rationalize a failed hypothesis that those funding the study want pushed.”
If the question is whether COVID causes more instances than the vaccine, there is no reason to compile data before COVID and before the vaccines. And, that is exactly what this study does when it compares those cases of vaccinated and unvaccinated.
Throwing out “racism” word is just a coverup for incompetence.
Sorry I missed the link... to the "analysis" of the study. As I suspected it is comprised completely of outdated cherry picked data selected specifically to support a misleading narrative. It has absolutely zero credibility and was meant only to confuse the easily and willfully confused.
You come back after a couple years and multiple more boosters and let us know how it has worked out for you and those exposed to the dangerous spike proteins that you are shedding.
"Throwing out “racism” word is just a coverup for incompetence."
Absolute nonsense. There is not only reason its the easiest most obvious way to check how much covid-19 was responsible for the condition.
You have a problem sir. Either you are hopelessly biased beyond reason or you are are really stupid.
"It looks like all of the Branch Covidians showed up this evening."
fireman15 wrote: “Sorry I missed the link... to the “analysis” of the study. As I suspected it is comprised completely of outdated cherry picked data selected specifically to support a misleading narrative. It has absolutely zero credibility and was meant only to confuse the easily and willfully confused.”
So, a study that “analyzed records from England’s National Immunization database for nearly 43 million people 13 or older who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine between Dec. 1, 2020 and Dec. 15, 2021. myocarditis.” is guilty of ‘cherry-picking’ the data?
BTW, you might want to read this article:
“People vaccinated against COVID-19 cannot ‘shed’ spike proteins to harm anyone.” “Claims about COVID-19 vaccine shedding began spreading in April and have been debunked many times.”
AndyTheBear wrote: “There is not only reason its the easiest most obvious way to check how much covid-19 was responsible for the condition.”
Comparing the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is a more obvious way to determine if vaccination or the virus is cause. Data from before COVID and the vaccines cannot do that.
AndyTheBear wrote: “You have a problem sir. Either you are hopelessly biased beyond reason or you are are really stupid.”
I won’t call you stupid but I will call you hopelessly biased beyond reason.
Call me whatever you want. Your words are empty.
Yeah right! The damage being done by the vaccinated and boosted shedding massive amounts of spike proteins to those around them as compared to the unvaccinated, are just starting to be realized.
Ridiculous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.