This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Posted on 12/29/2022 1:42:01 PM PST by absalom01
Can regs/rules be challenged at SCOTUS? This obviously would fail the Bruen test.
Ping
80% is pretty arbitrary as well. Can I buy a 75% gun kit?
How about someone bring a case that forces them to define a functional test to determine “readily”? For example, a challenger chooses an employee of their choice from BATFE and if they can’t complete it in 4 hours, it’s not “readily”.
Ping.
Till next month, yes.
That’s the crux of the matter.
The BATFE, under Brandon, has been aggressively pushing regulatory changes that make it impossible to determine in advance what is, and is not legal.
The 80% lower controversy looks utterly reasonable compared to their new definition of what constitutes a “suppressor”. No longer is something defined by its physical properties, but by the “intentions” of the person possessing it.
A grotesque mockery of the rule of law, but that’s cold comfort to the individual caught up in an “enforcement action” by the Federal Government.
Dark times indeed.
That went away for certain in 1933 if not before.
All the folk who tolerate and even defend the NFA-34 set us up for the current regime and eventual loss of all our RKBA.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Unfortunate, but “Readily” is true in this case.
Having completed some of these kits I know that the frame portion can be done with a hand file and drill if no better equipment is available.
It takes longer to assemble the parts than to mod the frame with decent equipment.
Then more time to get it to work right.
So not too difficult if you know what you are doing, but could be pretty frustrating for a first timer.
Absolutely it can be challenged. The definition of a receiver is law and the FAT may not change a law with a rule change.
No enumerated power for the federal to regulate the possession of arms by the citizens.
Saw this earlier today. Unsettling.
My favorite LIE from the ATF website “Myths about the AFT.”
“ATF makes the gun laws.
False: Congress makes federal gun laws;”
OH... Since it’s just a “rule” it’s not a law...
Those P80 frames can be finished in under an hour.
Ghost Guns are legal, 3D printers are cheap, PLA+ filament is strong.
Langley Outdoors Academy 8 minute clip has a different perspective that the ATF has overreached based on another lawsuit. Not that has ever happened /s.
He does look for subscribers and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxvHbf-uNHU
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.