How about someone bring a case that forces them to define a functional test to determine “readily”? For example, a challenger chooses an employee of their choice from BATFE and if they can’t complete it in 4 hours, it’s not “readily”.
That’s the crux of the matter.
The BATFE, under Brandon, has been aggressively pushing regulatory changes that make it impossible to determine in advance what is, and is not legal.
The 80% lower controversy looks utterly reasonable compared to their new definition of what constitutes a “suppressor”. No longer is something defined by its physical properties, but by the “intentions” of the person possessing it.
A grotesque mockery of the rule of law, but that’s cold comfort to the individual caught up in an “enforcement action” by the Federal Government.
Dark times indeed.
Those P80 frames can be finished in under an hour.