Can regs/rules be challenged at SCOTUS? This obviously would fail the Bruen test.
Ping
80% is pretty arbitrary as well. Can I buy a 75% gun kit?
How about someone bring a case that forces them to define a functional test to determine “readily”? For example, a challenger chooses an employee of their choice from BATFE and if they can’t complete it in 4 hours, it’s not “readily”.
Ping.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Unfortunate, but “Readily” is true in this case.
Having completed some of these kits I know that the frame portion can be done with a hand file and drill if no better equipment is available.
It takes longer to assemble the parts than to mod the frame with decent equipment.
Then more time to get it to work right.
So not too difficult if you know what you are doing, but could be pretty frustrating for a first timer.
No enumerated power for the federal to regulate the possession of arms by the citizens.
Saw this earlier today. Unsettling.
My favorite LIE from the ATF website “Myths about the AFT.”
“ATF makes the gun laws.
False: Congress makes federal gun laws;”
OH... Since it’s just a “rule” it’s not a law...
Ghost Guns are legal, 3D printers are cheap, PLA+ filament is strong.
Langley Outdoors Academy 8 minute clip has a different perspective that the ATF has overreached based on another lawsuit. Not that has ever happened /s.
He does look for subscribers and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxvHbf-uNHU
New AFT director Dettelbach is every bit the gun grabbing POS we thought he would be. Not even a tiny bit better than the rejected Chipmunk.