Baby dies of large blood clot after doctor ignores parents' request for unvaxxed transfusion

Lifesitenews.com ^ | 12/16/2022 | EmiliaMangiaracina

[NetAddicted]

Cornelia Hertzler said doctors discovered a blood clot in her infant son ‘within a few hours after’ a transfusion of blood from a general blood bank.

SPOKANE, Washington (LifeSiteNews) —A baby boy in Washington state died of a large blood clot after a hospital gave him a blood transfusion from a general stockpile instead of from an unvaccinated donor, as his parents requested.

Soon after baby Alexander was born on January 3, 2022, his parents Cornelia Hertzler and Ron Bly discovered not only that his esophagus and trachea were abnormally connected, but that he had a heart condition — Double Outlet Right Ventricle (DORV), in which oxygenated and deoxygenated blood are mixed — which required surgery for long-term survival.

In order to undergo neonatal heart surgery, Alexander was airlifted to Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center in Spokane, Washington, a Catholic hospital (as confirmed to LifeSiteNews) where his parents made clear to the hospital that they “did not want any blood transfusions from the blood bank” because they “were worried about blood from vaccinated donors causing blood clots.”

Bly explained to Louisa Clary of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation on Thursday that their caution was provoked at least in part by the death of a friend who was in her 60s and was “very healthy,” but who “had a heart attack three days after getting the Moderna shot.”

After repeatedly telling the parents that using unvaccinated blood from a directed donor would be very difficult and “very expensive,” the “hospital finally conceded, the day before” Alexander’s first operation, “that all the family needed to do was fill out a few forms to accept and utilize blood from specific donors,” reported Brian Wilkins, editor in chief of The COVID Blog.

“Turns out, the entire process was relatively easy and inexpensive,” said Hertzler. However, as Bly pointed out to Clary, the hospital still “kept delaying and delaying on” providing the “paperwork to get directed donor blood.”

Thus, the paperwork was not processed in time for the parents to use the unvaccinated blood for a transfusion by the time of Alexander’s second operation. While the surgery itself did not require blood, Dr. Eleane Beadle determined that Alexander needed a blood transfusion the next day due to low hemoglobin levels.

“Instead of waiting a few more days for the blood we had donated to be fully processed and available,” the doctor used blood from a general blood bank for the transfusion, Bly told Clary.

Wikins has pointed out that Washington “had a 70% fully-vaccinated population by February 1, 2022, with 79% receiving at least one injection,” and so “there was a near 80% chance Alexander got vaxxed blood.”

The doctor “found the blood clot within a few hours after he got the transfusion,” Hertzler told Clary on Thursday.

Hertzler said that while previously, the doctors had told them that “blood clots are very rare” in a case like Alexander’s, after he got a blood clot, they said, “Well, this happens. But…it’s something a blood thinner can fix.”

“And the blood thinners — they had him on the highest dose they could give an infant. And it did nothing. [The clot] just kept growing really fast,” she went on.

Hertzler believes that if the clot had been “normal,” then blood thinners would have helped dissolve it. She said that, “given our understanding” of the findings of abnormal clots in the vaxxed deceased, “we know that it’s not a normal blood clot.”

Bly explained in a fundraiser for Alexander that the clot grew to be “enormous,” and “eventually stretched from his left knee, all the way to his heart.”

A bacterial infection of MRSA “colonized the blood clot and no amount of medication nor antibiotics could shrink the clot or remove the infection.”

Baby Alex died 12 days after surgery, on February 17, 2022. He was buried in Walla Walla, Washington, after a Russian Orthodox funeral, Wilkins shared.

Bly later added on Alexander’s fundraiser page that his wife contacted Sacred Heart Children’s Hospital and that the hospital “claim[ed] they can find no record of our son.”

Hertzler told Clary she had “emailed the records team” at the hospital and was sent a form to fill out and asked to submit her ID and any name that Alexander might be listed under.

“I sent my last name, his last name, like his legal name … and she tried every single name and couldn’t pull anything up and said, I can’t find any record of him being in our system.’”

LifeSiteNews contacted Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center on Thursday seeking information to “confirm a few facts” on a story about a baby born earlier this year at the hospital.

“I have no information regarding that and this conversation is terminated,” replied a hospital staffer.

Hertzler told Clary that Alexander has an “honorary birth certificate” because of long delays in obtaining his official birth certificate at his birth hospital, which she said was due to a staff absence.

New Zealand’s High Court has recently taken temporary guardianship of a four-month-old baby after his parents remained firm in demanding that only blood not tainted by the COVID-19 “vaccine” be used during surgery to repair their son’s heart defect.

A video showing when the child was taken by police from the parents has since gone viral, in which the mother can be heard weeping and pleading as the authorities take her child away.

Heart problems have arisen in droves following the rollout of the COVID vaccinations. One major new autopsy report found that three people who died unexpectedly at home with no pre-existing disease shortly after COVID vaccination were likely killed by the vaccine. The report indicates that the deaths may stem from a vaccine-related autoimmune attack on the heart.

[MayflowerMadam]

“They knew this would eff up the blood supply and that they would damage the unvaxxed this way.”

I think that’s true, and probably why everyone without exception wasn’t mandated the shot. They knew that eventually it would get everyone, one way or another.

[Big Red Badger]

This WUHAN HOAX is insidious.

[combat_boots]

Yup

And all those people, dying alone and behind glass, with prohibited funerals.

Monstrous.

People bought the lie, which is now part of bureaucratic protocol. This has broken the social contract.

[Chauncey Gardiner]

I no longer trust doctors or their greedy institutions. Revoke your advance directives!

[gas_dr]

Takes a straw man to know one sir. The question I asked is not the one you want to answer because you cannot. You pivot.

And as a matter of law and ethics it is absolutely on the parents. They are the guardian of the child. They consented fo a high risk operation knowing blood transfusion was likely. Now they are boo hooing saying it’s not their fault.

They could have waited or sought different treatments. And then they come with this nonsense that they aren’t even sure their child received blood from vaccinated donors. It’s laughable.

Your defense of it though valiant in terms of nor giving an inch is preposterous. You can’t answer a question. Ecuador it’s obvious and will weaken your entire theme. So you throw mud.

It’s obvious. And somewhat entertaining.

[Fury]

Thanks for your post to counter the FRoctors on this thread.

[bagster]

Takes a straw man to know one sir. The question I asked is not the one you want to answer because you cannot. You pivot.

Ya can't pivot if you maintain the original point. Which is the doc didn't use unvaccinated blood like the parents requested. And somehow you want to blame it on the parents for trusting the doctor. As if the doc didn't discuss the surgery with the parents from the get. They f'd up. They trusted him.

And as far as your strawman argument goes, there is sufficient evidence from the bazillions of vaccines poked, that there is a connection between the vax and blood clots, amongst other things.

Go read a medical journal. Its time you updated your data base.

[grey_whiskers]

So now an actual case becomes “tenous” and “cannot be confirmed.”

Looking forward to the Nuremberg 2 trials.

Troll.

[gas_dr]

It is at best weakly useful. Certainly does nothing for advanced disease when we had delta. For every study cherry picked in that graph there are studies that show it does nothing.

When COVID was dangerous (a genetic shift) ivermectin did not save lives. The only and proven treatment was monoclonal prior to 10 days.

As for today corona virus is back to a cold. There is no reason to treat it at all. Most positive tests are incidental or people who really really really want to know

We need to stop broad treating and call it a day. If you have risk and you want updated vaccination get it. If you don’t have risk skip it. As I have always said this is a choice

As for ivermectin there is no reason to treat COVID omicron with anything. It runs its course and is over. But ivermectin did not work to stop delta progression to death.

[bagster]

Thanks for your post to counter the FRoctors on this thread.

So gay.

[gas_dr]

Dude read the article. There are holes gapingly wide in it. Not a toll at all. I just can read and apply a little logic. Calling everyone who disagrees with you a troll is rather diminutive of the word and perhaps suggests you are trolling for the other side

We can disagree honestly. Sorry I don’t drink the look aid.

[bagster]

Sorry I don’t drink the look aid.

But you drink the kook aid.

#IvermectinMiracleDrug

[gas_dr]

The facts are these. The parents consented to surgery. The child has acute anemia as he or she needed transfusion. The parents could have refused but I suppose that means child would have died. Parents could have refused surgical consent pending blood available. The parents of fault must be assigned are at fault here. And now using this to drive a political agenda. It’s hard for me to determine if the parents are the root of this or if the antivaxxers are abusing grieving parents and using them

Whichever one it is, it is disgusting.

[sauropod]

LAWSUIT!

[grey_whiskers]

I read the whole article.

What a lame response on your part.

The key points are the size of the clot and that it was impervious to blood thinners.

Oh, and the cover-up. They suddenly couldn’t find any record of the baby being at the hospital, and the hospital flunky saying on the phone “this conversation is over.”

All so very, very “safe and effective” aren’t they? (For the leftist, power-drunk and greedy doctors and admins, right? And after all, in the end, they’re the only ones who count, according to you $hot $hill$.)

Like I said, looking forward to the Nuremberg trials.

Hint: Nothing in this world will EVER convince those parents.

Hint 2: Sententiously claiming “strict scientific pwoof!”™ and “Because Muh Science!”™ in the face of those parents, only serves to self-identify you as at best a pawn or collaborator, and at worst a co-conspirator.

[grey_whiskers]

I have also discovered that many doctors fall victim to the “appeal to the expert” fallacy. Basically they believe what any expert has told them and refuse to do any research for themselves.

Medicine has been doing that for ages, going back to Galen.

And when challenged, they turn on the "Don't You Know I Am A Doctor?!"™ mode. Because Science!™ of course.

[gas_dr]

Unvaccinated blood wasn’t available. Child has high risk surgery for blood transfusion. Parents consented to surgery. They didn’t have to until blood was bandied and available consistent with their beliefs. Child developed what appears to be acute postop anemia which is common in cardiac and thoracic surgery. Waiting would have likely been life threatening. Child got transfusion (and by the way that clot was colonized with MRSA suggesting it was around a long time before the transfusion or caused by infection.

Parents could have held surgery pending banked blood or refused transfusion once they consented to the surgery. The were fully informed. They alone has the ability to consent. Sorry. If there is blame. It’s on them. Sorry it’s uncomfortable for you.

[grey_whiskers]

And up pops Mr. Hand Puppet on schedule.

[Fury]

Re: 98 - That web-site has credibility issues on how they represent study results.

An example, I picked one study at "random" (haha):

Mirahmadizadeh et al. Efficacy of single‐dose and double‐dose ivermectin early treatment in preventing progression to hospitalization in mild COVID ‐19: A multi‐arm, parallel‐group randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

Mirahmadizadeh et al., Respirology, doi:10.1111/resp.14318

and at c19ivm.org at https://c19ivm.org/mirahmadizadeh.html

Here what the study authors wrote:

"RCT with 131 24mg ivermectin, 130 12mg ivermectin, and 130 placebo patients, showing no significant differences in outcomes. Lower ventilation and hospitalization was seen with treatment, in a dose-dependent manner, but not reaching statistical significance with the small number of events."

Yet the intellectual titans at c19ivm.org list this study as one with a POSITIVE outcome! How? Who the hell knows. But the study has lots of green in the charts that c19ivm.org uses. And that green is misleading.

The study authors write one thing and c19ivm.org writes another.

Read what c19ivm.org claims studies show warily.

[Fury]

Re: 113 - thanks.

And I see lots of grayed out space in this thread meaning the usual suspects are posting whatever it is they post. If it’s the winning Powerball numbers - I will feel bad. Otherwise, I don’t miss the ignorance, threats, etc thanks to a Firefox extension.