Dude read the article. There are holes gapingly wide in it. Not a toll at all. I just can read and apply a little logic. Calling everyone who disagrees with you a troll is rather diminutive of the word and perhaps suggests you are trolling for the other side
We can disagree honestly. Sorry I don’t drink the look aid.
But you drink the kook aid.
#IvermectinMiracleDrug
I read the whole article.
What a lame response on your part.
The key points are the size of the clot and that it was impervious to blood thinners.
Oh, and the cover-up. They suddenly couldn’t find any record of the baby being at the hospital, and the hospital flunky saying on the phone “this conversation is over.”
All so very, very “safe and effective” aren’t they? (For the leftist, power-drunk and greedy doctors and admins, right? And after all, in the end, they’re the only ones who count, according to you $hot $hill$.)
Like I said, looking forward to the Nuremberg trials.
Hint: Nothing in this world will EVER convince those parents.
Hint 2: Sententiously claiming “strict scientific pwoof!”™ and “Because Muh Science!”™ in the face of those parents, only serves to self-identify you as at best a pawn or collaborator, and at worst a co-conspirator.