Takes a straw man to know one sir. The question I asked is not the one you want to answer because you cannot. You pivot. Ya can't pivot if you maintain the original point. Which is the doc didn't use unvaccinated blood like the parents requested. And somehow you want to blame it on the parents for trusting the doctor. As if the doc didn't discuss the surgery with the parents from the get. They f'd up. They trusted him.
And as far as your strawman argument goes, there is sufficient evidence from the bazillions of vaccines poked, that there is a connection between the vax and blood clots, amongst other things.
Go read a medical journal. Its time you updated your data base.
Unvaccinated blood wasn’t available. Child has high risk surgery for blood transfusion. Parents consented to surgery. They didn’t have to until blood was bandied and available consistent with their beliefs. Child developed what appears to be acute postop anemia which is common in cardiac and thoracic surgery. Waiting would have likely been life threatening. Child got transfusion (and by the way that clot was colonized with MRSA suggesting it was around a long time before the transfusion or caused by infection.
Parents could have held surgery pending banked blood or refused transfusion once they consented to the surgery. The were fully informed. They alone has the ability to consent. Sorry. If there is blame. It’s on them. Sorry it’s uncomfortable for you.