Posted on 12/16/2022 4:05:36 AM PST by Phoenix8
A "Karen" was bullied and mocked for her tears on Thursday's episode of Dr. Phil that featured two race activists whose mission it is to get White women to "acknowledge their privilege" and racism.
A woman named Ambrosia, who was featured in a viral video a few years ago for feuding with the staff at a UPS store, partially due to the store’s COVID-19 policy, was one guest.
She was dubbed a "Karen" after the video, a word the Dr. Phil show defined as "alleged obnoxious, angry, entitled, and perceived racist White woman who uses inherent privilege to get their way or police other people's behaviors."
placeholder Ambrosia cried while describing the incident on the show, explaining that it was difficult time in her life and denying that her behavior in the video displayed her typical personali
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Guess I’m done with Dr Phil again…he didn’t even challenge the concept of CRT just seemed to accept the idea that whites are inherently privileged. I quit watching him for years when he produced that show where a stupid woman fell in love and married some creep that killed her brother…whom she only met after he murdered her sibling. He said it was an acceptable thing for her to do.
White women that vote Democrat and blacks that vote for them 95% plus are everything destroying this country.
Need some Civics and IQ testing prior to being allowed to vote.
JFK. Clinton. Obama. Biden.
Every crap president we’ve had since the 19th Amendment have been women voting feeling over reason.
The problem was that you wat had a “doctor” phil show. By definition thoss are junk
I’ll say it again: it’s high time to end women’s suffrage.
Um, what?
The original ‘Karen’ WAS white.
So they appropriated ‘Karen’, huh?
First I’d read of this. Very odd, but not surprising.
Desperate, perhaps.
anyone on the gubment “take” should not be allowed to vote. Conflict of Interest.
I’ve heard the original founding fathers had already realized the danger of Allowing just anyone the vote. That you had to be some sort of a property owner which back in those days basically meant you were an earner not a grifter.
Likely some exceptions probably existed like sailors etc that was unfair but now it’s tilted too far the other way where nearly anyone with a pulse can vote… and sometime not even that.
Frankly, unless one owns land, they should not be allowed to vote. Anyone who doesn’t own land has a conflict of interest
And only land owners that are MEN should be allowed to vote.
Yes, Patriarchy!!
JFK won the male vote Nixon won the females.
White women generally vote GOP and have been pretty republican since they got the vote.
“In every presidential election since 1996, a majority of women have preferred the Democratic candidate.”
(snip)
“However, a majority of white women have voted for the Republican candidate since the 2000 presidential election when white women were almost equally split between Democrat Al Gore and Republican victor, George W. Bush.”
Single women swung the last election to Dems.
Go look at the polling results.
Perhaps we should not allow men to vote?
Nope.
They considered the idea but discarded it because they did not want the "rotten burrows" of the UK to be recreated in the US.
They also considered having a monarchy.
For some reason almost no one seems to want to praise that idea and say that we should "bring it back."
My response was to correct you about white women voters, and the 1960 election.
I had three sisters during the Clinton-Obama years. They would never admit it but they were voting for the man’s face, and nothing else. It’s a perfect example of why the founders didn’t want women voting.
Me thinks you are mistaken:
“Voting is controlled
by individual state legislatures. Only white men age 21 and older who own land can vote.”
Sosa.gov
Cry-USA.org
“ Becoming a freeholder was not difficult for a man in colonial America since land was plentiful and cheap. Thus up to 75 percent of the adult males in most colonies qualified as voters.”
States determined who could vote and so sorry but "Only white men age 21 and older who own land can vote" was not the case in all states.
In New Jersey for example women could vote if they owned personal property of 50 pounds. Which was not very much. Free blacks could also vote, subject to the same restrictions.
The idea of ownership of land being the deciding factor in all states is so much hooey. In the south land was often the deciding factor during the first few years. But slowly that factor was done away with until in 1856 it was done away with entirely.
After November 30, 1782 we were no longer under British rule and that time is considered post colonial.
Me thinks I wish you would you stop misrepresenting me!
I said:
“ I’ve heard the original founding fathers had already realized the danger of Allowing just anyone the vote. That you had to be some sort of a property owner which back in those days basically meant you were an earner not a grifter.
Likely some exceptions probably existed…”
You said I said “ only white men under age 21 and older who own land can vote”. No I sourced a website that said that, it supports what I said.
You said “The idea of ownership of land being the deciding factor in all states is so much hooey…”
YES good thing I didn’t say that!
I said “ some sort of a property owner … definition of property—-” a thing or things belonging to someone; possessions collectively.” That which of course would include the state you mentioned where you had to own 50 pounds.
Same as some states allowing blacks or women to vote. I never said some states didn’t, again I offered sources to show in a great preponderance of cases one had to be a PROPERTY OWNER…land IS property.
I’m done here…won’t argue just for the sake of arguing, nothing you said refutes a single thing I said.
Ok..Thanks for the correction on that.
repeal it. Our country has been on a slow glide downhill since it happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.