Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Javelin, Stinger stockpiles running low: Raytheon CEO
Al Mayadeen ^ | December 5, 2022 | Al Mayadeen

Posted on 12/05/2022 5:35:31 PM PST by Cathi

Javelin, Stinger stockpiles running low: Raytheon CEO

By Al Mayadeen English Source: Agencies

5 Dec 19:14

Raytheon's CEO stresses that the company's arsenals of Javelins and Stingers are running low due to the massive aid being sent to Ukraine/

Javelin anti-tank and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles are depleting at an alarming rate, with the arsenals being voided of weapons that took years to produce within months, Raytheon Technologies CEO Greg Hayes said Monday, citing the United States flow of aid into Ukraine as the reason being.

The United States has been sending Javelins and Stingers into Kiev in the thousands, and they have been acclaimed as one of the reasons why Ukraine has been able to hold its ground as well as it has over the course of the war.

Raytheon, in partnership with Lockheed Martin, is producing around 400 Javelins per month, the CEO revealed, noting that the stream of weapons into Ukraine has been driving eating through the two companies' stockpiles of shoulder-mounted weapons.

Meanwhile, the United States has sent 5,500 Javelins and 1,400 Stingers to Ukraine as of May, with the number definitely being a lot higher due to several aid packages approved since then.

“The problem is we have consumed so much supply in the first ten months of the war," the arms manufacturing conglomerate's CEO said, stressing that the stream of arms used up five years' worth of Javelin production and 13 years' worth of Stinger production, wondering who was going to replenish the depleted stockpiles.

Since the start of the war and through September, the US has given Ukraine $15.8 billion for "security assistance", which includes a package worth $600 million. Additionally, the White House asked Congress for $13.7 billion for "security and economic assistance" for Ukraine.

The opposition to aid to Ukraine is growing; not because the continuous flow of arms would only prolong the war, but because Republican members of Congress cannot justify spending so much money overseas when their country is grappling with various economic and financial crises, most notably soaring inflation.

The United States has not only been giving money and arms to Ukraine, as a senior official in the US Department of Defense said earlier this month that his country was closely engaged with the armed forces of Ukraine ahead of their Kharkov counteroffensive, providing Kiev's military with intelligence in the buildup to the operation.

Despite Washington providing information to Kiev about Russian command posts, ammunition depots, and other potential targets, Ukrainian officials had been hesitant to disclose operational plans to their US counterparts earlier in the conflict, fearing that doing so "could highlight weaknesses and discourage continued American support," US officials told the New York Times.

Hayes' words came during an address he made about US defense industrial production during a panel on Ukraine at the Reagan National Defense Forum, an annual panel aimed at drumming up support for America's military complex.

During the same panel, Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth said the Pentagon awarded $6 billion worth of new contracts to the defense industry to replenish US weapons stocks.

"Just in the last month, for example, we've given contracts to Raytheon for six batteries of NASAMS," she stressed. "We've also given contracts for Excalibur. We've also put out contracts to General Dynamics, IMT Defense, and one other company to increase production of 155-millimeter ammo, which has been critical to the Ukrainians."

On the other hand, House Armed Services Committee chairman Adam Smith claimed that Ukraine was "spending the money really well, and that's why they're winning."

However, in addition to burdening the US with requests for aid, Ukraine is selling weapons it acquired from its allies on the black market due to the Kiev forces' limited ability to use them because of their lack of training, logistical challenges, and the diminishing size of the Ukrainian armed force, according to former senior Pentagon adviser Karen Kwiatkowski.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: billittothegrandkids; billittothekids; putinlovertrollsonfr; putinsbuttboys; putinworshippers; stingermissiles; swampniks; ukraine; vatnik; zottherussiantrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: reviled downesdad

“Have to factor in the supply of parts and materials down the supply chain. Many integrated circuit chips are also on allocation level of supply, but national defense is first on the allocation lists.”

I know, I was being sarcastic by talking like the dweebs running our government.

For complex weapons it’s a HUGE effort to spin-up supply lines that either don’t exist or barely exist. I suspect that the Russians know this weakness with the West, so they were happy to drag on the war, knowing that the West will be virtually out of weapons* and be forced to make concessions, and some of those concessions may go beyond Ukraine.

*I suspect that we’ve given Ukraine far more weapons than we claim, and are virtually out of some of them. Obviously we’d rather not disclose such stupidity, but the Russian government likely knows more about our predicament than our own people.


21 posted on 12/05/2022 6:15:05 PM PST by BobL (By the way, low tonight in Estonia: 18 degrees, burrr!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

China has already won the economic war. And now the military war without firing a bullet. Did you notice China has not sent any military or financial aid to Ukraine?


22 posted on 12/05/2022 6:16:21 PM PST by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Yeah, 10% for the Big Guy.


23 posted on 12/05/2022 6:17:15 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

(the strategic petroleum reserve)

A weakened America was always the goal of Herbert Dwayne Barack Hussein Brawndo Obama.


24 posted on 12/05/2022 6:18:12 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

And in other related news, the DNC funds are getting low.


25 posted on 12/05/2022 6:19:05 PM PST by cp124 (80% of everything is fake or a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

Where’s the money?
The oft-cited figure of $300 billion in “frozen” assets is derived from the last time the CBR made the composition of
its FX reserves public, in January 2022. The report has since been removed from the CBR’s website, but can still be
downloaded via the Wayback Machine. 18 What the Group of Seven (G7) and a few more likeminded countries
decided to do in the weekend after February 24 was, in fact, to block the CBR and NWF’s access to their holdings.
The use of the word “freezing” is not accurate. It also suggests the sanctions-wielding capitals know

Western countries cannot fulfill their own sanctions and block two-thirds of the reserves of the Russian Central Bank. Because no one knows where they are.

After the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine, the G7 countries decided to block Russia’s gold and foreign exchange reserves located abroad, which were estimated at $300 billion. But in the end, less than a third of this amount was arrested, and the rest was simply not found. This is reported by the Atlantic Council analytical center, working under NATO.

Now officials are trying to find the remaining reserves or the Russian institution that owns them. At the same time, analysts say, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation does not make the task easier - the last time the regulator published a report on the structure of its reserves in January and has not updated it since.

Thus, the Atlantic Council notes, the statement about the freezing of Russian reserves is not accurate. Moreover, it has now become clear that the countries imposing sanctions do not always know exactly what assets they are trying to block.
227.7Kviews
10:29


26 posted on 12/05/2022 6:21:30 PM PST by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“What about material shortages? Biden has killed supply side, and that is big contributory factor for inflation.”

Absolutely, I was making a sarcastic imitation of the military-hating clowns we have running our government. They think it’s real easy - just tell Raytheon that they want another 10,000 Stinger, and Raytheon goes to Home Depot, buys the parts, and puts them together.

They’re finally getting a bit of a lesson that the adults have always known.


27 posted on 12/05/2022 6:22:41 PM PST by BobL (By the way, low tonight in Latvia: 24 degrees, burrr!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

“Amazing that they can burn through 13 years of Stinger production in just months.”

Not when you consider the CLOWNS that we now have making production/readiness decisions. We never had a chance.


28 posted on 12/05/2022 6:37:32 PM PST by BobL (By the way, low tonight in Latvia: 24 degrees, burrr!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Did you notice China has not sent any military or financial aid to Ukraine?

They have been supplying the Russians, at least to some extent.

How much is unknown. They are getting Russian oil fairly cheap, it appears.

Much easier to win by capturing the other country's leadership through bribes than by fighting a war...

29 posted on 12/05/2022 6:50:16 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

Why is Raytheon stock dead. You would think it would be up for the year. It’s ending 2022 below its 12 month average.


30 posted on 12/05/2022 7:17:04 PM PST by ncfool (TRUMP SHOULD BE THE KING MAKER IN 2024 AND NOT THE KING. -- Desantis 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi
'Javelin, Stinger stockpiles running low: Raytheon CEO'
31 posted on 12/05/2022 7:22:56 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

On the other hand, House Armed Services Committee chairman Adam Smith claimed that Ukraine was “spending the money really well, and that’s why they’re winning.”

Yes. They’ve got that spending down tight.


32 posted on 12/05/2022 7:23:09 PM PST by Flick Lives (Cui bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yes, the Chinese are smart, deceptive and cunning.


33 posted on 12/05/2022 7:23:38 PM PST by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
"So's the strategic petroleum reserve but then again common sense is running low in this administration... In fact there is none."
It's part of a plan.
34 posted on 12/05/2022 7:23:57 PM PST by Hiddigeigei ("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

It’s getting so that even if it were real news, I don’t believe anything. At all.


35 posted on 12/05/2022 7:34:28 PM PST by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

I wonder how many of those have been paid forward islamic terrorist NGOs.


36 posted on 12/05/2022 7:37:11 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I was wondering who would leak this information out.

It was probably made up in the offices of the source, an Arab media outlet that is anti-Israel, pro-Russia, and pro-Iran.

37 posted on 12/05/2022 7:39:42 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Are you sure your not a CEO somewhere? That’s the easiest answer that couldn’t be more wrong so you must be the CFO.


38 posted on 12/05/2022 7:42:25 PM PST by wgmalabama (Censored!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cathi
Amazing that they can burn through 13 years of Stinger production in just months.

Not really. Stinger production has been on a very limited basis due to the large stockpiles and the age of the weapons system. Raytheon is not the only company that builds Stinger missile systems, other vendors may be more actively building them.

39 posted on 12/05/2022 7:51:32 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BobL
knowing that the West will be virtually out of weapons

How will the Russians build more of their weapons if they can't smuggle in the US based chips their systems depend on?

If those parts are not available to US defense contractors they won't be available to smugglers who want to divert them to Russia either.

40 posted on 12/05/2022 7:54:31 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson