Posted on 12/04/2022 10:32:52 AM PST by Montana_Sam
Graham Hancock is featured in a Netflix documentary regarding his theory of an advanced, ancient civilization more than 12,000 years old.
“Even to this day many megalithic structures have an affinity for certain harmonics and specific frequencies. Notability in the Great Pyramid and a few other well know monuments.”
Can you share any links or shite papers on these please?
“Those aren’t sawcuts. They look like the quartzilite string cuts we know they used”
I’d encourage you to do more research. The marks of large, circular sawblades are compelling.
Anotehr viewpoint regarding Schoch:
Yes, there is a lot of evidence that some ancient civilizations had technology to do very precise work that would be challenging for us even today. However, I don’t think that fact alone supports some of the more extreme logical leaps to attribute it to “advanced technology” beyond what we possess. I tend to think that we are just missing methods that could have accomplished these feats with simpler technology; methods that have been lost to us since they were probably “trade secrets” among guilds that were never written down, and that have become obsolete over many millenia since we tended to move away from megalithic construction and on to easier to use constructions methods like brick and concrete.
“It is also well known that over time, especially in antiquity, quarried stone, metals were sought after, recycled and repurposed. So metal object - tools etc are rare”
You would find traces of these quarries, which we don’t.
And there would always be one or two tools left, lost, but we don’t fing anything of that sort.
Can you share information about this “moving items with sound”?
Btw, copper would be found, so would stone. But we don’t have any of this
Ain’t riding the Band Wagons fun?
I just love it.
The Sphinx in Egyptian antiquity is identified with Anubis, not Leo.
There are numerous inscriptions naming and linking Anubis and Roustau (the Sphinx). There are **none** that link the Sphinx with Leo.
Leo and the Lion body was a theory put forth by Herodotus, 2,600 years ago, and goes unchanged to this day, lest Egypt lose the historical theory on which most of its revenue depends.
Yes, I’m skeptical until they find a ‘Monte Testaccio’ or the quarry sites with the chips and discards from shaping the liths.
Not sure how many photo’s you’ve examined, but from the hundreds that I’ve reviewed, it is clear that the formations are the work of intelligent engineering.
In too many places, different types of stone are layered up.
Also, stones are stacked in unnatural ways.
The top photo on the following page is interesting. How would that be considered a natural formation?
https://www.montanamegaliths.com/
I did read about these a decade or so ago as an amateur Assyriologist. These do not look like sawblades at Baalbeck.
I would also point out episode 2 of the Ancient Apocalypse has this illogical statement “professional archaeology would have us believe that 9,600 BC people suddenly developed agriculture and 6000 years ago founded cities.
That’s a period of 5000 odd years.
Not suddenly.
The various versions of the string or sand blade have been disproven by the many instances of cuts where the method simply could not have been accomplished.
Various academics have put on saw cut dog and pony shows that are now discounted
Yes, it does seem, from several videos I’ve seen, that Egyptian tourism is a huge driver of which theories are acceptable.
Quarries that reside 400 feet below sea level or quarries that were worked out and repurposed later?
You do not find that which you do not look for or believe non-extant.
no you do not understand - metal tools were like gold, like diamonds - things to be hunted and reused.
Yes there is a least one chapter documenting it in a book called Netherworld by Robert Temple. There are also numerous other books all citing moving objects by sound including some recent physics experiments, not to mention videos demonstrating stone affinity with sound in megaliths.
Copper corrodes and after 12,800 exposed would be would be wholly gone - as would any remnant of our current civilization.
“These do not look like sawblades at Baalbeck.”
Baalbeck is an archealogical stew from what I’ve been able to find, with heavy evidence of Roman engineering overlaying older remnants interspersed with newer factoids.
So, yes, you’re right about Baalbeck; everything is askance.
Mark Lehner (American) and Zahi Hawass (Egyptian) are the guardians, along with whom ever is running The Ministry of Tourism & Antiquities
“There are numerous inscriptions naming and linking Anubis and Roustau (the Sphinx).”
Ah, but as you said in an earlier comment, “Rostau” is not a name for the Sphinx. “Rostau” is a name for the whole complex on the Giza plateau, which is a symbolic representation of the underworld, and thus the connection with Anubis can be made regardless of any association with the Sphinx. The Sphinx itself seems to be linked more closely with Horus (Her-em-akhet) than with Anubis, and Horus was indeed often depicted with the characteristics of a lion.
I watched it last week.
There is almost nothing in it that should get the “establishment” worked up. He goes from place to place and “reports” on facts…and then tries to connect dots.
It’s ancient civilization stuff…not ancient aliens. That’s kind of nice.
There are common creation and flood myths that cross cultures and continents. He thinks the fascination with astronomy and consistency among the sites points to “a message” about where the last apocalypse came from. And, it’s not spaceships.
I’m going on a slightly different tangent here.
I don’t agree with everything Hancock postulates, but I 100% support his right to say it. The lefties and mainstream academics claim his views are “dangerous” and he needs to be shut down. They compare believing in his theories to believing in election fraud.
That tells me they are afraid of what he is saying and that they have no faith in their “facts” when challenged.
What are they hiding?
Why don’t they want opposing views discussed?
The ruins all about the earth should have already given that clue.
I don’t get NetDix and have no interest in paying for their perversion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.