Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery of Paul Pelosi hammer attack deepens as new police account reveals how Speaker's husband calmly opened door to cops after phoning 911, did NOT reveal he was in trouble and then walked BACK towards 'intruder' who bludgeoned him
daily mail ^ | 11/4/2022 | ANDREA CAVALLIER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Posted on 11/04/2022 9:23:06 AM PDT by RummyChick

A seemingly calm Paul Pelosi never let on to responding officers that he was in distress just seconds before he walked back into his house where an intruder bludgeoned him with a hammer, new details from police sources have revealed.

David DePape, 42, is accused of breaking into the Pelosi home and beating Paul Pelosi, 82, over the head with a hammer after reportedly intending to hold his wife, US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, hostage and break her kneecaps.

Instead of telling officers that he needed help, or trying to flee the home, Pelosi calmly greeted them and then retreated several feet back into the foyer where police saw the DePape strike him with a hammer, police sources close to the investigation told NBC News.

It's not clear if Pelosi was already injured or what his mental state when he walked several feet back into the house, away from police.

But according to the the San Francisco police report, both Pelosi and the intruder each had a hand on the hammer when officers responded to the home, which they reportedly were struggling over as police yelled, 'drop the hammer!'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: california; daviddepape; nancyisthebeard; nancypelosi; paulpelosi; pelosi; pelosiincident; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: RummyChick

NBC had to “walk back “ the meet the press report Sunday that a third person opened the door

Lol


61 posted on 11/04/2022 10:14:53 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It would be ridiculous to believe the cops didn’t know it was Pelosi’s pad. How stupid is that.


62 posted on 11/04/2022 10:15:33 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

The whole think reeks...

It’s why Nazi Pelosi is missing in the media...She’s acting as if her husband was found guilty of bribery, instead of being physically attacked.


63 posted on 11/04/2022 10:16:10 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Those are the facts, under oath.

The 3 year FBI agent who swore the oath, Stephanie Minor, said:

"I primarily investigate United States persons who commit violent criminal acts in furtherance of their political or social ideology."

Young, and biased to find what Nancy wants her to find, I'd say.

She also said:

"This affidavit also reflects my current understanding of facts relating to this investigation. That understanding may change as the investigation proceeds."

All the wiggle room she needs to restate her story as needed.

64 posted on 11/04/2022 10:16:53 AM PDT by Tellurian (Your phone is your cattle tag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket.”

I have been handed cards like that walking down the street in Las Vegas. They are know as HOOKER CARDS.


65 posted on 11/04/2022 10:17:25 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

If your city were responsible for policing her house I would think they would know..even if a rookie who was responding didnt know... someone would inform

now that NBC has deleted their story there is just more fuel to the fire of a cover up


66 posted on 11/04/2022 10:17:44 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

The Brits had to tell us the TRURH? Why? So Paul is a Gay dude—so what. He needs to find better sex partners! Stop trolling for Nut cases.


67 posted on 11/04/2022 10:18:04 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade ( Ride to the sound of the Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Bookmark


68 posted on 11/04/2022 10:19:04 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Just had my Twatter account Locked ,by my use of the wrong pronouns... because I referred to females, attracted to other females that were in a mob that had just attacked a conservative protestor -


69 posted on 11/04/2022 10:19:38 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Gee...run the address...guess who would pop up. No way they didn’t know.


70 posted on 11/04/2022 10:25:36 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: euram

“If her husband was actually injured, he’s just collateral damage to her power-hungry obsession.”

If her husband were actually injured, SHE’S AN ACCESSORY TO ATTEMPTED MURDER.”

There, I feel better now.


71 posted on 11/04/2022 10:26:36 AM PDT by HeadOn (Love God. Lead your family. Be a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

9-11 didn’t know?? No way...


72 posted on 11/04/2022 10:27:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

removing it from their Twitter account and website, NBC News says “the piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards.”

Will Almaguer face a suspension or punishment? What about his producers? Will they give an on-air correction? (2/2)


73 posted on 11/04/2022 10:31:00 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
removing it from their Twitter account and website, NBC News says “the piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards.”

Oh, you mean these "standards"?


74 posted on 11/04/2022 10:33:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
maybe the two source rule
75 posted on 11/04/2022 10:34:15 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

if the police would release the body cam footage we might actually learn the truth..so of course they wont release it


76 posted on 11/04/2022 10:37:19 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

“...when first we practice to deceive...”

Yeah - but these guys ought to be PROS by now!


77 posted on 11/04/2022 10:39:53 AM PDT by HeadOn (Love God. Lead your family. Be a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

If they were both holding the hammer, even with one hand, the culprit would have had to have moved to the door.


78 posted on 11/04/2022 10:39:57 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

Maybe PP thought the cops were the male strippers he ordered.
++++++++++

Village Peeps


79 posted on 11/04/2022 10:40:29 AM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; RummyChick

Just a theory (based on knowing a lot of cops & state troopers): Perhaps... perhaps... the police are being very careful NOT to use the names of high-profile individuals over monitored radio channels (even if encrypted).

I remember a big deal being made in the PA State Police about troopers using Nextel “push-to-talk” phones to communicate with fellow troopers rather than using monitored police radio nets. That was squashed quickly when it came to light.

I am not a police officer. Just making a generalization based on scuttlebutt in unconnected incidents.


80 posted on 11/04/2022 10:40:49 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson