cuz it’s not a vaccine...it’s more like an antibiotic...temporary. stops nothing.
Yes, the CDC changed its definition of vaccine from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” The public health agency also changed its definition of “vaccination.”
Uhh...because the Population Control zealots, corrupt Pharma, corrupt Fed agencies, and corrupt politicians, colluded to label this goop as a “vaccine” when it is NOT!
Because they aren’t 100% effective and never have been?
We just thought he was joking.
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037##
Clinical trials for these “vaccines” are not designed to evaluate transmission of disease by the “vaccinated”.
If you point this out to your doctor you will be yelled at for not trusting the government.
But here is the link, you can look for yourself.
- cannot prevent infection
- cannot prevent transmission
- cannot prevent hospitalization
- cannot prevent death
- causes clots, myocarditis, periocarditis and numerous other side effects
- compromises your natural immune system
Vaccines are products that protect people against many diseases that can be very dangerous and even deadly. Different than most medicines that treat or cure diseases, vaccines prevent you from getting sick with the disease in the first place.
If you are talking about covid, then you talking about political misleading. The vaccine for covid was never supposed to be able to cure the virus. It was to make it easier to have the illness.
“COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States are safe and are effective at protecting people from getting seriously ill, being hospitalized, and even dying.”
“COVID-19 vaccines can offer added protection to people who had COVID-19, including protection against being hospitalized from a new infection, especially as variants continue to emerge.”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/vaccine-benefits.html
Notice they didn’t say cure, just make it easier to have the virus. Anyone that says cure is a liar. People like Joe Biden
And doesn’t it seem strange that they can come up with a virus “cure-all” in less than a year when they haven’t figured out how to stop the bubonic plague that’s been around since the 1300’s and still is found in the US every year? Simple:
“...but viruses fall under the infectious disease umbrella. So, no. Viruses cannot technically be cured.
https://nanocellect.com/blog/can-infectious-disease-be-cured/
But there’s always this:
“”There are actually plenty of cures for viral illnesses,” he said. “We just don’t think of them as cures.”
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-03-coronavirus-viruses.html
wy69
Because that's not what they are for...................
Duh ... cuz medication taken internally is only intended to mitigate the effect of the germs inside the body. No internal medication can control the spread of germs that exist outside the body.
Why is that so hard to understand ...
They were either never intended to prevent transmission or they were brought to the market before being tested enough to prove they don’t prevent transmission.
There has never been a successful vaccine against a coronavirus.
This type of virus is a prolific replicator. It’s strength is in the amount of copies it can produce. The quality of those copies is where the problem lies. The number of mutation occurring is massive. At that point, it’s a game of numbers. Some mutations will be effective. Others will die.
The immune system is always playing catch up.
Gee, the Polio and Smallpox vaccines prevented the spread of those diseases didn’t they?
A. "Vaccines" -- in general -- DO aid in REDUCING transmission by protecting the vaccinated host so the disease cannot become established in their body; it can get ON them, but not INTO them. So, the vaccinated can carry -- and spread -- the disease EXTERNALLY for only a brief period, as contrasted with them HOSTING the disease INTERNALLY, and being a source of transmission for a longer period.
B. The COVID shots ARE NOT "vaccines" in the traditional sense; the definition of "vaccine" had to be changed in August of 2021 in order to -- illegitimately -- bring them into the fold. The mRNA jabs do not work the way actual vaccines do, they do not confer immunity at all well -- certainly not LASTING immunity, and while they may reduce the severity of an infection, they do not prevent the COVID virus getting INTO the host and being carried about INTERNALLY, so the host becomes a source of transmission for a longer period of time. WORSE, because the COVID shots do mute symptoms, the host may well be unaware they are becoming ill, and remain out and about during the most critical phase of communicability, thus not only not REDUCING transmission, but EXACERBATING it.
I must make one other relevant assertion: POINT B does not describe what's been called "asymptomatic spread" because the vaccinated host does end up with symptoms, feels ill, and takes then-appropriate measures. "Asymptomatic spread" is confined to cases where the individual NEVER feels ill at all, nor manifests any symptoms, but has had a close enough encounter to COVID to have been well and truly exposed, and therefore (in theory, at least) is able to be a surreptitious source of transmission of the COVID virus.
Also, the notion of asymptomatic spread has been quite roundly debunked.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/proof-of-asymptomatic-spread