Posted on 10/21/2022 9:10:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Ask any single woman about the ease of dating in today’s world and they will most certainly roll their eyes and groan. As a single woman myself, I can vouch for how tough the dating climate is for every one of us. But unvaccinated, single women now have it that much harder. The reason? The decision as to whether or not they will date vaccinated men is now on the table. And I can tell you first-hand, which has nothing to do with the viability of the candidates, themselves, as rich and interesting prospects, but rather “sex” to put it bluntly.
The overriding concern that the harmful effects of this vaccine may, ultimately, enter these women once the raincoat comes off.
As these women chose to remain unvaccinated for a reason, mitigating any risk by eliminating candidates based upon vaccine-status has become their new norm. Doing so isn’t without its issues, admittedly. Qualifying single men by such a standard makes the pool in which to select from additionally small, especially if one is living in a blue state. On top of that, plenty of single men don’t shine to the notion that they aren’t being considered simply because they decided to get vaccinated. Among the most disgruntled, hostile men tend to be those who succumbed to the vaccine by force. Feeling penalized twice over for a vaccine they never wanted to begin with, many of these men don’t handle these women’s rejection well.
Guilt, annoyance, diminishment, and just plain rudeness are known to occur in relation to these women’s decision to stay committed to their particular stance. “I have been called names for stating that the vaccine is a dealbreaker for me,” said Anika Janis.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The clot shots are messing with men’s sperm. Who knows what kind of creatures will result in them procreating? Any woman should run like hell away from “vaxed” guys.
The assumptions are reasonable, I think. The 80% vaxxed percentage is true. Even if you play with the assumption percentages, the math says she won’t likely be able to find a mate inside the no vax cohort.
“A deal breaker all on it’s own? No.”
A deal breaker all on its own? YES!
Your date showing up wearing a mask might provide a small clue - LOL!
We’re aware of your Dugway history. You have a vested interest in selling these jabs.
“The unvaccinated only marrying the unvaccinated is a great way to degrade the gene pool.”
It eventually will result in a superior echelon of people.
“I would not be so hard on those men who got the shot due to job pressures.”
It’s not the fact that they had to give in due to job pressures. All of us feel sorry for them. The problem is the fact that their genetic makeup has been modified which may impact their offspring. And then there’s the shedding which could impact anyone physically near them.
“If the vax is a deal breaker then she should just accept that she will be childless and single for life if she is currently single.”
In other words, every single male on earth has had the clot shot, and there’s not even one available man she could marry and have children with? Yikes!!
Sod off, Swampy, as the old saying goes.
I’m guessing that being 20 is in your rear view. What you find to be a deal breaker is irrelevant.
“The 80% vaxxed percentage is true.”
I question those percentages, most of the unvaxxed are in the younger age groups.
Why? She can find a like-minded man who refused to bow to MurderNA or Fauxi as lord and Science.
As it is, most 30 year old women are childless and single these days. And 80% of young men are not actively dating. I don't think vax status is coming into play for the vast majority of young people.
No, there are billions who refused to take the Jim Jones Jab and they remain in the gene pool. Those who took the Jim Jones Jab left the gene pool and are now part of a laboratory tank and since they all took the same modified gene sequence, they're the ones who will be inbreeding.
I don’t think the average 20 year old spends alot of time worrying about “Fauxi”.
Absolutely false analogy. The correct analogy is even more fundamental than "I don't want any of that blood that has AIDS or Hepatitis", it's "I don't want any of that blood that's the wrong blood type".
Those who took the Jim Jones Jab altered their DNA with the same man-made DNA strain.
https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/moderna-sues-pfizer-and-biontech-over-covid-vaccine/
No, but they do spend a lot of time worrying about hypergamy and monkey-branching. A male with damaged DNA and potential health complications which lower his chances of being a healthy provider is considered a poor sperm donor.
Well, my gorgeous half-French, half-English niece is in her 20s, and she feels as I do. She’s even more adamant on this issue than I am. So your snarky crack about my age is ... irrelevant.
It's not a good clue. Branch Covidians wear the mask but also people who refused to get the Jim Jones Jab. They were told they had to continue masking while the Pfascists lied and said the "vaccinated" could stop wearing the masks because they "wouldn't get COVID" and "wouldn't spread it."
I don't know how many people are still wearing masks as a symbol of defiance and showing others they will wear the mask instead of getting the Fauxi FrankenFormula.
Some Democrat areas still have Jim Jones Jab mandates in place as of today (10/21/2022). For example, New York City will lift the Jim Jones Jab mandate for private employers on 11/1/2022 but keep it in place for New York City government employees and for private companies that want to mandate it to employees.
Can she read a demographic chart and do basic math?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.