So why was Pfizer selling it at all?
And tens of thousands of federal government workers DISMISSED for not taking this useless “vaccine”?
Ans Djokovic banned from entering this country let alone take part in the US Open for refusing to take this clearly dangerous “vaccine”?
Nice try AP.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I am not sure this “fact check” is factually correct. Check out Pfizer’s FDA Emergency Use application, I believe it says “to treat and prevent transmission” or words to that effect.
But all this still misses the point. It’s not so much what Pfizer did or didn’t say, rather it is what the vast majority of health authorities and politicians and media said - including Fauci. They basically claimed you needed the jab to prevent spread even though most thoughtful people could see in front of their eyes that it did no such thing.
Media be like Pretzels during Oktoberfest.
Harmeet explains what can and can’t be done:
VIDEO: 3m54s: Fox News: The Next Reovlution: Harmeet Dhillon: There should be justice for those impacted by vaccine mandates
Presenter: Steve Hilton
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6313869007112
the six mentions of “transmission” in the Authorization:
20 Nov 2020: FDA: Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product
Review Memorandum
6.2. Unknown Benefits/Data Gaps...
Vaccine effectivenes against transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from
individuals who are infected despite vaccination. Demonstrated high efficacy against
symptomatic COVID-19 may translate to overall prevention of transmission in populations with
high enough vaccine uptake, though it is possible that if efficacy against asymptomatic infection
were lower than efficacy against symptomatic infection, asymptomatic cases in combination with
reduced mask-wearing and social distancing could result in significant continued transmission.
Additional evaluations including data from clinical trials and from vaccine use post-authorization
will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing virus shedding and
transmission, in particular in individuals with asymptomatic infection...
8. Overall Summary and Recommendation...
Potential benefits that could be further evaluated but are not necessary to support an EUA include prevention of COVID-19 in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, prevention of mortality and long-term complications of COVID-19, reduction in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduction of SARSCoV-2 transmission...
https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download
one big scam.
I was one who believed that lie. The CDC also repeated that lie. When people got vaccinated, people thought they were able to kiss their mom without passing the COVID. They thought the hygiene measures were over and they could again live life like before the epidemic. Methinks this could be lawsuits of an existential threat to Pfizer.
It is correct that (1) A Pfizer executive did testify before the European Parliament that Pfizer did not know whether the vaccines prevented transmission at the start of vaccine sales and distribution, and (2) In its published phase 3 trial report, Pfizer did not claim to have tested (or even designed the trial to test) for prevention of transmission—and publicity right around the first Emergency Use Authorization was careful to state that reduction of symptoms (actually of “mild” symptoms) was what the vaccine had (supposedly) been shown to provide.
But that does not mean that Pfizer did not lie about what the vaccine could or would do.
What AP leaves out is that Pfizer through its CEO had promised limited or no transmission, including protection of society by “herd immunity” through vaccination already in August 2020, as well as in the months after the roll out. See for example the videos and commentary at https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-pfizer-marketed-the-vaccines.
What the AP also knows (or has reason to know) is that big pharma, as a rule, simply does not share results of tests with negative results (or even admit they were run), and does not run trials that are known or expected to produce negative results. So Pfizer saying (or claiming) that they did not test for preventing infection and spread is really Pfizer admitting that they knew or expected that the vaccine would not prevent infection and spread.
AP: Always Propaganda
Why, I never thought to put the vaccine in my transmission. I thought you just put it in your body.
Regards,
AP provides a helpful, self-aggrandizing, fact-check statement:
"This is part of AP's effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP."
“Speed of Science”?
I was unaware that ‘science’ had constant velocity.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/goldinmelissa
Check out the backround of one of the do-called fact checkers.
This was her last job...
https://www.newsguardtech.com/
VERDICT: The lie wasn’t chiefly Pfizer’s. This “revelation” merely highlighted the fact that Presidents and Prime Ministers around the world were making outrageous, false claims not based on science but on politics.
Thankful I had enough sense NOT to get the jab and ignored the undue PRESSURE from misinformed loved ones to do so. I am worried about their future health. FJB and FAF.
The AP trying to cover for Pfizer doesn’t really accomplish the CYA at all. My question is, why wouldn’t the AP folks be just as angry and upset about the damage done due to Covid? They act like none of their people care that the actions of the big pharma wasn’t saving us at all. I call BS on AP!
Of course the criminally complicit healthcare workers never connected any of this to the injections she has taken or questioned whether they are connected to this sudden onset condition. Avoid these death injections at all costs because those in "healthcare" will not warn you about the obvious risks. Buyer beware!
Bump!
Rapid antigen testing as a reactive response to surges in nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak risk
The vaxx mandate for healthcare workers has created superspreader employees who put patients at risk.