Posted on 10/16/2022 9:08:47 PM PDT by DoodleBob
Newsguardtech Special Reports: American Independent Pink Slime Network
Thankful I had enough sense NOT to get the jab and ignored the undue PRESSURE from misinformed loved ones to do so. I am worried about their future health. FJB and FAF.
Even-handed, my derriere.
That’s cover.
The fact that this thing even exists should be curling peoples’ hair.
The lie was from Pfizer.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-pfizer-marketed-the-vaccines
The CEO: “it’s not about you, it’s about all of us.” if you don’t get the vaxx “you are the weak link that will allow this virus to replicate.”
"Have you or a loved one been killed, severely injured, lost your job or been economicly impactated due to the fraud of the COVID-19 vaccinations?"
The AP trying to cover for Pfizer doesn’t really accomplish the CYA at all. My question is, why wouldn’t the AP folks be just as angry and upset about the damage done due to Covid? They act like none of their people care that the actions of the big pharma wasn’t saving us at all. I call BS on AP!
BKMK
Yes, I said “was not CHIEFLY Pfizer’s.” (emphasis added) The “fact-checkers” tried to make Pfizer’s behavior the issue, but the real issue was the the behavior of the politicians. Companies overselling their products is nothing new; politicians using that oversell to repress their own citizens is the top news story of the entire 21st century.
Good point. Companies overselling their products can also be subject to litigation for fraud in a way politicians can’t.
SmokingJoe :" So why was Pfizer selling it at all?
And tens of thousands of federal government workers DISMISSED for not taking this useless “vaccine”?
Ans Djokovic banned from entering this country let alone take part in the US Open for refusing to take this clearly dangerous “vaccine”?
Nice try AP.
(From the Source Article): " Rob Roos, a Dutch European Parliament member who asked Small a question about transmission at the hearing,
tweeted: “BREAKING: In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission."
‘Get vaccinated for others’ was always a lie. The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know."
"At the hearing, Roos asked Small whether Pfizer had tested its COVID-19 vaccine for its ability to prevent transmission of the virus prior to its market release.
Small answered: “No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”
She went on to explain why Pfizer moved quickly to develop a COVID-19 vaccine as the virus spread worldwide.
While Roos and many others framed this as a new revelation, Pfizer never claimed that its clinical trial,
upon which the vaccine was authorized for use, evaluated the shot’s effect on transmission.
In fact, shortly before the vaccine’s release, the company’s CEO emphasized that this was still being evaluated."
" A study funded by Pfizer and German vaccine maker BioNTech published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Dec. 10, 2020, a day before the Food and Drug Administration gave Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization, did not include data about the vaccine’s effectiveness at reducing transmission of the virus.(Emphasis Mine)
Instead, it reported that two doses of the vaccine provided 95% protection against contracting symptomatic COVID-19 in people 16 and older.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla also said in a December 2020 interview with NBC News that it was still unclear whether vaccinated individuals could carry the virus and transmit it to others."
"The FDA stated in a Dec. 11, 2020, press release announcing the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine that “at this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection,
nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.”
A Pfizer spokesperson told The Associated Press that its clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine
in preventing disease caused by the COVID-19 virus, including severe illness."
Recent court case has Pfizer denying liability for its 'clot shot' because the Feds KNEW the testing required for EUA was not done and ordered the product anyway.
Of course the criminally complicit healthcare workers never connected any of this to the injections she has taken or questioned whether they are connected to this sudden onset condition. Avoid these death injections at all costs because those in "healthcare" will not warn you about the obvious risks. Buyer beware!
Thank you for calling it a velocity.
Sometimes science goes *backwards*, and a vector construct allows for this.
In summary, Pfizer/CDC did not know:
- adverse effects
- transmission reduction
- affect on infection rate
- safety
So .... snake oil
Bump!
Like I said, I am not about to defend it, as I agree that it’s mere existence is an affront to freedom of speech. It’s basically another form of Snopes.com.
A Pfizer spokesperson told The Associated Press that its clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine in preventing disease caused by the COVID-19 virus, including severe illness." (Emphasis added)
That's a lie.
The trial was focused on assessing ONE thing: PREVENTION. Words have meaning. From the referenced FDA press release:
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued the first emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (Emphasis added)
From the referenced Pfizer documentation:
2. INTRODUCTION
The BNT162 RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are currently being investigated for prevention of COVID-19 in healthy individuals.(emphasis added)
These shots were NOT authorized to lessen symptoms, to keep people out of the hospital or morgue, or make them pretty.
The objective function of the testing and statistical metrics was PREVENTION. And these shots can't even succeed at that without continuous boosting, which seems to bring with it Nasty Side Effects.
Revoke the EUAs.
Ping
Rapid antigen testing as a reactive response to surges in nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak risk
The vaxx mandate for healthcare workers has created superspreader employees who put patients at risk.
BTW, was in a heathcare setting recently. Witnessed an eye-popping number of infection control protocol violations by healthcare employees.
Despite the signage posted everywhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.