Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe; DoodleBob; metmom; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; ...
Infectious Disease/Prepper ping - Pfizer sells a covid "vaccine" that wasn't even tested against covid (Snake Oil)
AP floats a "puff piece" offering cover for Pfizer since it is still currently in an "experimental" clinical study (including mRNA process)
No wonder the FDA/CDC/Pfizer medical health cabal had to rewrite the definition of "vaccine" under "Emergency Use Authorization"
The article speaks for itself about the "vaccine", the FDA/CDC/Pfizer health cabal, and the useless need for a "vaccine" passport

SmokingJoe :" So why was Pfizer selling it at all?
And tens of thousands of federal government workers DISMISSED for not taking this useless “vaccine”?
Ans Djokovic banned from entering this country let alone take part in the US Open for refusing to take this clearly dangerous “vaccine”?
Nice try AP.

(From the Source Article): " Rob Roos, a Dutch European Parliament member who asked Small a question about transmission at the hearing,
tweeted: “BREAKING: In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission."
‘Get vaccinated for others’ was always a lie. The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know."

"At the hearing, Roos asked Small whether Pfizer had tested its COVID-19 vaccine for its ability to prevent transmission of the virus prior to its market release.
Small answered: “No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”
She went on to explain why Pfizer moved quickly to develop a COVID-19 vaccine as the virus spread worldwide.
While Roos and many others framed this as a new revelation, Pfizer never claimed that its clinical trial,
upon which the vaccine was authorized for use, evaluated the shot’s effect on transmission.
In fact, shortly before the vaccine’s release, the company’s CEO emphasized that this was still being evaluated."

" A study funded by Pfizer and German vaccine maker BioNTech published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Dec. 10, 2020, a day before the Food and Drug Administration gave Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization, did not include data about the vaccine’s effectiveness at reducing transmission of the virus.(Emphasis Mine)
Instead, it reported that two doses of the vaccine provided 95% protection against contracting symptomatic COVID-19 in people 16 and older.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla also said in a December 2020 interview with NBC News that it was still unclear whether vaccinated individuals could carry the virus and transmit it to others."

"The FDA stated in a Dec. 11, 2020, press release announcing the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine that “at this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection,
nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.”
A Pfizer spokesperson told The Associated Press that its clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine
in preventing disease caused by the COVID-19 virus, including severe illness."

30 posted on 10/17/2022 7:14:05 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Tilted Irish Kilt

In summary, Pfizer/CDC did not know:

- adverse effects
- transmission reduction
- affect on infection rate
- safety

So .... snake oil


34 posted on 10/17/2022 8:13:05 AM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
Thank you. Just one small but big clarification:

A Pfizer spokesperson told The Associated Press that its clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine in preventing disease caused by the COVID-19 virus, including severe illness." (Emphasis added)

That's a lie.

The trial was focused on assessing ONE thing: PREVENTION. Words have meaning. From the referenced FDA press release:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued the first emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (Emphasis added)

From the referenced Pfizer documentation:

2. INTRODUCTION
The BNT162 RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are currently being investigated for prevention of COVID-19 in healthy individuals.(emphasis added)

These shots were NOT authorized to lessen symptoms, to keep people out of the hospital or morgue, or make them pretty.

The objective function of the testing and statistical metrics was PREVENTION. And these shots can't even succeed at that without continuous boosting, which seems to bring with it Nasty Side Effects.

Revoke the EUAs.

37 posted on 10/17/2022 9:29:28 AM PDT by DoodleBob ( Gravity’s waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson