Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hunger In America: Why Hasn't It Already Been Ended?
Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 24 Sep, 2022 | Francis Menton

Posted on 09/25/2022 5:23:35 AM PDT by MtnClimber

As you may know, the Biden Administration is planning to hold its big “White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition and Health” this coming Wednesday, September 28. Apparently, we are to believe that “hunger” is and remains a significant problem today in the United States. Thankfully, we have President Biden and his many minions hard at work on the job, with a promise to finally end this scourge of human hunger once and for all. According to the announcement of the conference, “The Biden-Harris Administration has set the goal of ending hunger . . . by 2030.”

But wait a minute — hasn’t hunger in the United States already been ended? I seem to remember multiple prior government promises to end hunger in America, each of them followed by massive funding, and/or increases in prior already-massive levels of funding to achieve the goal. Are we only now learning that none of these prior efforts worked? If not, that would represent a huge failure of the government bureaucracies that had been charged with dealing with and solving this problem. Those same bureaucracies are still in place today, spending tens and even hundreds of billions of dollars annually and, if we are to believe President Biden, failing miserably in their prime responsibility of ending hunger. Shouldn’t those bureaucracies be held accountable for that failure?

It was May 6, 1969 — I was a freshman in college — when President Richard Nixon delivered his big address to Congress calling on them to “end hunger in America.” Excerpt:

in the past few years we have awakened to the distressing fact that despite our material abundance and agricultural wealth, many Americans suffer from malnutrition. . . . That hunger and malnutrition should persist in a land such as ours is embarrassing and intolerable.

In his big address, Nixon proposed a thorough revamp of the various then-existing federal food programs, all designed to be sure that sufficient food got where it was needed to “end hunger.” According to the text of the address, the program revisions that the President was recommending would add approximately $1 billion per year to a pre-existing food distribution budget of about $1.5 billion per year, for a total of about $2.5 billion per year. (According to this CPI-based inflation calculator from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, $2.5 billion in 1969 dollars would translate to close to $20 billion in 2021 dollars.). Nixon then followed up on these big plans by holding his own “White House Conference on Food, Nutrition and Health” in December 1969., where he “fervently urged that hunger in America must be eliminated.”

Ronald Reagan became President in 1981. By that time, federal spending on food and nutrition programs had about doubled from the 1969 figure, to around $40 billion (in 2021 dollars.). Yet the press contained persistent reports of Americans going hungry, in spite of all the spending supposedly designed to prevent that from happening. In August 1983 Reagan created a Task Force to figure out how that could be, and issued an interesting Memorandum to the Task Force. Excerpt:

I have seen reports in the press in past weeks of Americans going hungry. I am deeply concerned by these stories. . . . At the same time, I admit to being perplexed by these accounts because, the fact is, federal law guarantees that every poor person with an income at or below 130% of the poverty level is eligible to receive free food stamps. Additional federal aid includes free school lunches, free school breakfasts; the Women, Infants and Childrens program, and numerous other federal programs. If the poor, who are eligible by law for this help, are not receiving it, then something is wrong.

But assertions that hunger persisted in America continued. Barack Obama was the President who really believed in federal food programs as the route to “end hunger,” and who pressed that goal throughout his campaign and then his time in office. As a candidate in 2008, Obama presented hunger in America as a continuing and serious problem, and pledged that it would be ended on his watch. From the Food Research & Action Center, October 2015:

In the fall of 2008, then-candidate barack Obama pledged that as President he would aggressively tackle hunger in America and eliminate childhood hunger.

Spending on federal food and nutrition programs had reached approximately $60 billion (2021 dollars) by the time Obama entered office, but then the spending really took off. The spending reached a peak of over $120 billion in 2015 before falling a bit to just under $120 billion by the time Obama left office. Here is a chart of federal food and nutrition program spending from 1980 to 2021, from the US Department of Agriculture:

In an early post on this blog from April 2013, I recounted how the federal government during the Obama administration aggressively recruited people to sign up for the food stamp program.

But Obama was a complete amateur compared to Biden. With the excuse of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the vehicle of his blow-out spending bills, Biden has taken federal food and nutrition spending to incredible new heights. Here is text accompanying that chart from the DOA:

Federal spending on USDA's food and nutrition assistance programs totaled $182.5 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2021, 49 percent more than the previous high of $122.8 in FY 2020. Spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) also reached a new high and increased by 44 percent from FY 2020 to FY 2021.

So in just Biden’s first year in office, federal food and nutrition spending soared by some $60 billion, which is about the entire level of such spending at the time Obama first took office less than 14 years ago.

According to the latest from the Census Bureau here, in 2021 there were about 37.9 million Americans deemed to be “in poverty” by the official measure. As discussed here many times, the number of people deemed “in poverty” by the official measure is a wildly inflated figure, ginned up by systematically excluding from the metric well over $1 trillion of annual in-kind distributions from the government, not the least of which is all federal food and nutrition assistance. Still, if you credit this figure of 37.9 million people “in poverty,” it would mean that the federal government in fiscal 2021 distributed some $4815 of food and nutrition aid for each and every one of them, or $19,261 for a family of four.

And now we are told that that enormous generosity by the American people still did not fix the problem. So the White House will hold a new big conference, undoubtedly to give every advocate a platform to come and demand yet more and more spending.

If you’re wondering how it could be possible to spend the incredible sum of $182.5 billion in one year on food and nutrition programs in American without eliminating hunger, one potential answer can be found in the recent series at PowerLine about the Minnesota Feeding Our Future scandal. According to recent federal indictments, scammers in this one incident stole well over $200 million in federal food aid and used it mainly to buy luxury goods and real estate for themselves.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Society
KEYWORDS: communism; corruption; food; hunger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: CodeToad

How can you tell who are EBT user is, it’s all credit card-based now. Do you look at a person and say, “oh food stamp recipient”?


21 posted on 09/25/2022 6:14:15 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

there is free food everywhere in our community.


22 posted on 09/25/2022 6:21:43 AM PDT by ronniesgal (Just GET A JOB already. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“How can you tell who are EBT user is, it’s all credit card-based now.”

Without even seeing the card, if someone pays for food items with one card and uses another card or cash for non food items, it’s a good bet that an EBT card was involved.


23 posted on 09/25/2022 6:22:56 AM PDT by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rlsau1
The fraud cases are a drop in the bucket compared to the LEGAL rip-off of U.S. taxpayers through these stupid programs.

“Nutrition assistance” isn’t designed to stop hunger. It’s designed to be a massive subsidy for farmers, food producers and grocery store chains. Walmart is probably the strongest lobbyist for these things. I give it 5-10 years before people are allowed to use EBT cards to buy backyard grills, beer, and restaurant meals.

This is what happens when a country no longer aspires to do great things. Instead of sound anything useful and productive, we just set up government-run rackets like this.

24 posted on 09/25/2022 6:24:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

When you see them use it to pay.


25 posted on 09/25/2022 6:27:12 AM PDT by Shoefus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Sorry — instead of DOING anything useful and productive …


26 posted on 09/25/2022 6:28:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

CitiBank is now running commercials pushing their “commitment” to “ZERO Global Poverty”

The leftists lies & propaganda is never ending and continues to grow.


27 posted on 09/25/2022 6:30:11 AM PDT by newfreep ("There is no race problem...just a problem race")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Two Answers:

1.) They don’t want “hunger” to end.

2.) They continually redefine hunger so it will never go away.


28 posted on 09/25/2022 6:39:59 AM PDT by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Hunger produces their salaries


29 posted on 09/25/2022 6:41:12 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The cards say ebt.


30 posted on 09/25/2022 6:42:04 AM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yes, I do judge people because I am paying the freaking bills!


31 posted on 09/25/2022 6:43:11 AM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

***free government money***

I made the mistake of going to a Walmart store and grocery on the first day of the month! PACKED!


32 posted on 09/25/2022 6:45:45 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( FR is on GAB! https://gab.com/groups/67851)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Penelope Dreadful

I remember forty five years ago, you could make a down payment on a brand new car using food stamps as the down payment.


33 posted on 09/25/2022 6:47:19 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( FR is on GAB! https://gab.com/groups/67851)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Penelope Dreadful

That $200 would then become $2 in buying power. Raise the financial floor raises inflation.


34 posted on 09/25/2022 6:50:26 AM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Because hungry foreign INVADERS are allowed to pour across our southern border like packs of hungry wolves.


35 posted on 09/25/2022 6:52:36 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Josef Bidenov is out to take out your children. Keep them protected from Bidenov goons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The more money that gets thrown at something, the more money that is stolen.


36 posted on 09/25/2022 7:09:46 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

The other thing that is in every house is a big screen tv with cable. $200 or so a month


37 posted on 09/25/2022 7:10:00 AM PDT by 5inch38gunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

There is no hunger from what I can see. The “poor” in America are morbidly obese and own cell phones. One does not get that fat being hungry.


38 posted on 09/25/2022 7:12:44 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

If we were producing petroleum products, like we should be, and not burning corn in our vehicles, there would be no need for concern.
The midwest is blanketed in corn fields, and the oil is there for the taking. It’s all political, and all by design.


39 posted on 09/25/2022 7:12:49 AM PDT by Fireone (When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Yep. I’ve lived in poor countries. I know what a hungry child looks like - and starving kids! I’ve never seen a kid in the USA who looked food-deprived. Not one!

Seen a HUGE number of obese kids, though....


40 posted on 09/25/2022 7:14:26 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson