Posted on 09/13/2022 3:42:32 PM PDT by week 71
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szUC8GpGJ4A
Since more than 44% of the adults in this country are boosted, that means the vaccines are working, right? /s
Yeah but, it would have been way worse if they were unvaxxed and stuff or something
“You’ve had a very strong reaction to something.”
Interesting.
Censored? I like his stuff. What did he do?
“Since more than 44% of the adults in this country are boosted, that means the vaccines are working, right? “
Correct. The number is greater than 64%.
“This guy started out almost as a shill for the jabbers, but then he got red-pilled.
Interesting.”
$$$. He got a lot more views.
It really doesn’t mean anything unless a significantly larger portion of the vaxxed were hospitalized.
“This guy started out almost as a shill for the jabbers, but then he got red-pilled.”
He was getting 20k viewers till he went to the dark side. The conspiracists jumped in and he was getting hundreds of thousands of viewers.
I believe it is a comparison among the vaxxed. That is, those who had 3 or 4 shots vs. those who had one or two.
Right, IF the purpose was just to “lessen the impact”. Which we can never prove a negative, so will never really know.
If it was to provide true immunity, it failed.
I realize you are a big proponent of the jabs, but I find it curious that you’re cynical about a medical professional’s motivation and not the least bit cynical about the motivation of Big Pharma, CDC, and FDA.
I think he was talking about all-cause mortality in England. That is what I heard on the Net. I saw one of his videos about all cause mortality and while alarming it was still there. I have never seen him appear so crestfallen, alarmed or something than that video.
Again, I cannot confirm he has one of his videos censored.
@ 13 good post
Thanks. I like his material a lot.
Grin - I think around 33% are at least thrice jabbed. To be fair, obviously more of folks over 70 are getting boosted than the rest and are at higher risk of hospitalization.
But then again there is that Lancet article from February that indicates people around 80, if they are jabbed are more likely than the unvaccinated of the same age to die from covid. Crazy Days.
Too bad there are so few journalists who ask questions that need answers.
But then again there is that Lancet article from February that indicates people around 80, if they are jabbed are more likely than the unvaccinated of the same age to die from covid. Crazy Days.
Too bad there are so few journalists who ask questions that need answers.
Well, if there were any journalists out there interested in looking into this situation, they'd have plenty of raw data, hiding in plain view, that they could start with.
For instance, make of this what you will, but according to death certificate information reported by state health departments to the National Center for Health Statistics, deaths involving COVID among the 75-84 age cohort this past June 2022 were up 50%, compared to June 2021. For the 85+ age cohort, COVID deaths in June 2022 were up 172%.
For July 2022, COVID deaths in the 75-84 age cohort were up 52%, compared to July 2021. For the 85+ cohort, COVID deaths were up 172%.
How does this compare to younger age groups? Well, for the age 50-64 cohort, COVID deaths in June 2022 were down 51%, compared to June 2021. For that same age cohort in July 2022, COVID deaths were down 52% compared to July 2021.
If one assumes, which I think is plausible, that it is those in the older age categories that are most likely to be not only vaxxed but boosted, then it is perhaps significant that earlier this past summer it was those in those older age groups that were faring worse than the same time the year before. In any event, it doesn't speak all that well of the "public health" (i.e., governmental) response to this so-called "pandemic." One might even wager that the governmental response, overall, only made things worse.
One might even wager that the governmental response,
overall, only made things worse.
**********
Well you have to thin the herd via some method.
That data raises eyebrows. I will say again, I am bewildered so few journalists are asking questions. Is it because their company is sponsored by big pharma? Who knows..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.