Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[bagster]

It’s very tempting to accuse you of lying as you have so falsely accused me, but I will refrain for now.

Because, as we all know, you're WAY better than everybody else. And you only watch Jane Austen and nature programs.

[entropy12]

I am not planning on more shots any time soon.
I think this virus is mutatating fast and fortunately the newer versions are less lethal than the older versions.

When covid first hit USA, our immune systems were not familiar with signature of that new virus. That is why it was so contagious and killed lots of people in the beginning, especially those with comorbidities. Now we have been well exposed to the virus and herd immunity has taken root.

Almost 19 months after my first jab I have zero adverse effects from the jabs. Besides I have a rigorous regular exercise routine. I just mowed my lawn with a push mower (not self propelled) in 85 deg humid Florida weather. Then I edged the driveway and edges along side walk. Did not need a break. And I have enough stamina left to go play 9 holes. I am sure you have read before that my age is 82. Regular aerobic exercise has phenomenal benefits in 70’s & 80’s.
I don’t even get colds. Can’t remember my last cold. Has to be 15+ years ago. Don’t need any prescriptions or doctors.

I highly recommend regular aerobic exercise to all Freepers of Medicare age. Start slow, build up slowly to a good 30 minute routine 5 times every week. You will be shocked how good that benefits health. I am not kidding, I feel athletic enough to join a ballet class and not be laughed out of it.

[bagster]

I also forgot to say this:

Troll.

Ahahahaha!

Yer killin' me, Smalls.

Take notes, Carrot Top. This is how you make humor.

[bagster]

I made error. My apologies. (I was in a hurry 😁)

You are very sloppy and lazy.

[grey_whiskers]

I have *never* used *any* of the phrases you put in so-called “scare quotes”.

That's why I used the very word scare quotes, here.

Babbling about things like (scare quotes, rhetoric) “muh peer review” and “dirty dozen misinformation” and “science deniers” isn’t going to cut it.

You later tried a comeback with

"You keep using that phrase, “scare quotes”. I do not think it means what you think it means:

I then went to your OWN SOURCE and the FIRST SENTENCE said "Scare quotes is a general term for quotation marks used for purposes other than to identify a direct quotation."

You then followed up by saying I was taking it out of context, and that you'd never used the phrases I put in scare quotes.

Right. That's the reason I used the words "scare quotes" NEXT TO THEM. Which even your own source refuting me says to do when indicating something is not literal.

[grey_whiskers]

Try

https://www.functionalmovement.com/articles/455/pavel_tsatsouline_simple_and_sinister

Kettlebells, by a former Russian Special Forces trainer or somesuch.

[bagster]

But enough of this silliness. Another poster was correct when he pointed out all this derails from the topic at hand a little while ago.

Hilarious coming from the master derailer herself. Do you even listen to yourself?

[bagster]

I have *never* used *any* of the phrases you put in so-called “scare quotes”.

You never fail to miss the point.

I see what you are doing here....

No "sweetheart", I don't think that you do.

[bagster]

Then I edged the driveway and edges along side walk. Did not need a break.

#NoRetardZone

[grey_whiskers]

I didn’t lose my privileges for using ivermectin nor HCQ early on. I just dropped using or because it didn’t do a thing to help not marred how badly I wanted it to work.

At what point in the disease progression do you first see your patients? How many days from (inferred if not verified) initial infection, how many days from first symptoms?

[bagster]

I have *never* used *any* of the phrases you put in so-called “scare quotes”.

Scare asterisks.

[David Chase]

I don’t read or comment about gay_whispers………….

[bagster]

I don’t read or comment about gay_whispers………….

Big fat liar.

Somehow you comment to your g/f VaxHerd about what Grey Whiskers says without reading what he says. How does that work?

Gay Whiskers. I get it.

#CarrotTopLevelOfHumor

[LilFarmer]

Well said, and I agree 100%

[SecAmndmt]

You’re making the same false assumption that the vax pushers make: that ppl who are vxd took it because they wanted to or because they were well-informed. In Texas, we had plateau’s at about 45% in late summer 2021. Then the mandates came through. Almost no one I know who is unvxd regrets it. And the vxd? Anecdotal, but a family friend who is 4x vxd has had multiple odd health issues starting 4 weeks after #4. Bleeding in her eye and foot, non-stop body aches head to toe since then, trip to emergency with BP 210/180. Blames the vx, and greatly regrets not waiting, as I had cautioned. Recent trip to hospital and the zombie staff wanted her to get #5 in spite of her issues. Her Mom: odd bleeding problem in foot, blames the vx. Her sister and BIL. No more vx. Another: lady who helps with my son (African) 2x vxd despite misgivings, now concerned and regrets taking. Another: my Dad has hear lt and neuro issues after #3. And then there are the millions who had a choice between their job and not taking it. I know many of those. In the conservative evangelical churches (the places where truth is more likely to be preached), half to two-thirds of the congregation is unvxd. Why do you think Fauci wanted Trump to push the vx on his base? They didn’t want it. They don’t want it. Who does want it, and brags about their boosters? The political left.

Yes, McCullough is revered. The conventional medical profession is quickly becoming despised, on the other hand. I suspect it will get bad for you all when the vx injuries, cancers and heart issues build into a raging torrent. Not being vxd, I’ll be watching quietly from a distance.

[David Chase]

gay_whispers not whiskers.

Are you a paid troll?

[SecAmndmt]

Too much for one response. I’ll deal with Bowden then need to get back to work. Her practice does not take insurance. Cash only, and her prices for procedures are listed up front. She is an ENT who transmogrified into cv19 care. Now has treated 4000+ with zero hospitalizations. Made the comment about treating unvxd only a long time ago, to make a point about medical discrimination against the unvxd. Never did it. She treats cv in both vxd and unvxd. She has multiple ongoing post-vx injury cases active.

All the ppl publicly attacking her are far left pronoun ppl. Methodist is no longer bashing her because she has a couple pending lawsuits against them.

[bagster]

gay_whispers not whiskers. Are you a paid troll?

Okay, that's almost funny.

Of course I'm a paid troll. Duh.

[gas_dr]

I had occasion to use IVm and HCQ within 24-48 hours after diagnosis. Remember at that time it was literally all hands on deck. I was happy to write for these meds when someone like a family member or let nurse got sick. I had occasion to use several close contacts when there was nothing better. It really didn’t stop progression to those whom were going to progress. I agree with the statements that severe disease was 1% or so

I am of the opinion that those who may have taken IVM and did well probably would have anyway. I tried literally every drug mentioned and some not. I was aggressive with IL-6 inhibitors. There was not a lot of success. I did everything I could to avoid mechanical vent support. But it was unavoidable in a lot of situations. I sent patients for ECMO. At the end of the day the only thing I saw that worked were the -mabs. I used these extensively and early. I had only one patient progress to severe disease and that patient survived.

This is where we should keep our eye on the ball as it satisfies everyone’s concerns.

Have a pleasant day.

[humblegunner]

Of course I'm a paid troll.

El Chapo's Sinaloa Organization likely pays better.
Probably better protection in prison per our previous conversation.

I could put in a word for you, been an employee of ChapoCorp for near about 25 year.