Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[CatHerd]

Your post is a hodgepodge of unsupported allegations.

No, *you* are not following. I have never posted anything about “dirty dozen misinformation” or “science deniers”. Please stop claiming I have said things I did not, even if only in your own self-interest. False accusations do not reflect well on you.

[grey_whiskers]

No,I am not the one arguing in bad faith. I have never pushed the vaccines on anyone and you know it, never even hinted anyone should get it, am unvaccinated myself. You kbow all these things.

No, I literally didn't know these things. I saw you show up on jab threads and engage in ad hominem and strawman against any and all opposition to the jabs, being sure to focus on the fringe elements, presenting them as representative.

Troll.

[444Flyer]

“Athletes were almost all given the fake vax if they wanted to play. It was mandated in almost all sports at every level.

Even today, unvaccinated Novak Djokovic has been denied entry into the US to play at US Open.”

Check out the sponsors. Makes sense now.

“US Open: Lack of tact? - Moderna is a sponsor in Flushing Meadows”

https://www.tennisnet.com/en/news/us-open-lack-of-tact-moderna-is-a-sponsor-in-flushing-meadows

[grey_whiskers]

I have never posted anything about “dirty dozen misinformation” or “science deniers”. Please stop claiming I have said things I did not, even if only in your own self-interest.

The exact line from my post:

Babbling about things like (scare quotes, rhetoric) “muh peer review” and “dirty dozen misinformation” and “science deniers” isn’t going to cut it.

What part of the bolded is too hard for you to follow? The phrase "scare quotes" MEANS it is not literal.

[grey_whiskers]

So you don’t want to look through Pfizer’s own studies which they’ve been forced by a court to make public?

[CatHerd]

No, you knew. I have informed you of that multiple times. You replied to a post I made on this very thread where I stated I “am unvaccinated, am firmly against mandates, never so much as hinted that anyone should get vaccinated, and clearly state there are legitimate concerns about the vaccines” (all of which I have posted on FR multiple times)

Your reply to my post:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=486#486

My post:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=312#312

It’s very tempting to accuse you of lying as you have so falsely accused me, but I will refrain for now. Going by past history, including recently on this thread, you’ll likely try to weasel out of it with excuses and blame shifting, but I will give you a fair chance to act like an adult man, not a weasel.

[Salamander]

It took two years and 2000 dogs volunteered for Fort Dodge Laboratories studies, by the kennel my dogs came from, to research and develop the KF-11 and Neopar vaccines.

Because that is how making real vaccines actually works.

The Coofjab?

Not so much.

[grey_whiskers]

No, I just forgot.

[grey_whiskers]

I checked your links. You're lying through your foul teeth again. Your first paragraph of your post, that this post is replying to says (literal quotation marks on your part): “am unvaccinated, am firmly against mandates, never so much as hinted that anyone should get vaccinated, and clearly state there are legitimate concerns about the vaccines”

Your post 312 does not contain those words. The most it says is "— never mind I’ve never had the vax. (eye roll)"

Your post 312 was NOT TO ME. It was to another $hot $hill.

And my post #486 was NOT IN REPLY to 312.

It's beginning to look like you can't help posting abject lies even when the refutation is trivially apparent.

But for the record: You officially claim you never got the jab.

So what? You don't have to have got the jab in order to be an apologist or shill for it.

[grey_whiskers]

No, I just forgot.

I also forgot to say this:

Troll.

[CatHerd]

I made error. My apologies. (I was in a hurry 😁)

Your post in reply to my #312 is here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=366#366

And yes, my #312 *does* say exactly what I said it did. It’s the 4th sentence of the first paragraph. Right after the “catheter herder” you snickered at in your reply.

Try again:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=366#366

[grey_whiskers]

I made a typo while Ctrl-F’ing.

Offsetting penalties, repeat first down.

[Jane Long]

Yep....the ‘victim’ class swarm now insist they’re not pushing these horrid $hots, yet, for *some* reason flock (swarm) to $hot warning threads....all while continuously attempting to label those who have accurately questioned the SAFETY and EFFECTIVENESS of these $hots as ‘cultists’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, etc., etc.

Their miserable attempt at pivoting is so obvious. As more and more bad news comes out, about these $hots, their dancing/pivoting will be increased.

As we’ve repeatedly suggested to them....find threads/post threads that tout the positive aspects of these shots....as you say, what they’re supposed to be doing (confer immunity), prove safe/effective...but, they cannot.

So, they troll $hot warning threads. And, smear and bismirch good and REAL docs, who have actually saved lives with preventative and treatment protocols, as well as warned about the dangers of these horrid shots.

And, just like good leftists....they revel in calling folks who warn, are not in favor of these shots as ‘cultists’, ‘Q cult’, ‘conspiracy theorists’, etc. They are, for some reason, obsessed with Q and with Dr Naomi Wolfe, as a DISTRACTION....since they have no positive $hot articles to post.

All boils down to TROLL/$hot $hill/pharm bots.

[444Flyer]

8/27/22

“Exhaustive study of German mortality data finds excess deaths tightly correlated with mass vaccination”

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/exhaustive-study-of-german-mortality?triedSigningIn=true

[444Flyer]

8/28/22

“Rockefeller Foundation Wants Behavioral Scientists To Come Up With More Convincing COVID Vaxx Narratives”

“...The SSRC and the Mercury Project are not only receiving funding from foundations, but also government based institutions. In June of 2022 the Mercury Project received another $20 million from the National Science Foundation, which claims to be an “independent” agency of the United States government. Meaning, fabricating effective covid propaganda is becoming a money train for the small groups of behavioral researchers and psychologists that jump onboard...”

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/rockefeller-foundation-wants-behavioral-scientists-come-more-convincing-covid-vax

[CatHerd]

You keep using that phrase, “scare quotes”. I do not think it means what you think it means:

https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/527032

But enough of this silliness. Another poster was correct when he pointed out all this derails from the topic at hand a little while ago.

[Jane Long]

Exactly.

Thanks for all of the articles/links you’ve posted.

[grey_whiskers]

The first sentence at your link:

Scare quotes is a general term for quotation marks used for purposes other than to identify a direct quotation.

Troll.

[444Flyer]

You’re welcome Jane.

I just found this. Very upsetting pictures of a 12-year-old after her first Pfizer injection.

Pictures at link:

“Toxic epidermal necrolysis after first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccination with pharmacogenomic testing”

“...1.1 Case presentation

A healthy 12-year-old girl with no previous medical history presented 6 days after her first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. Two days after vaccination, she developed a low-grade fever with a mild sore throat. The patient did not take any oral prescribed or over-the-counter medications or herbal remedies during the past 8 weeks. On the 6th day after the vaccine, there were erythematous, painful patches and plaques on the chest wall and trunk, which subsequently spread to the face, palms, and soles. Mucocutaneous erosions were observed in the ocular, oral, and genital regions. She was diagnosed with TEN and immediately admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit...”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pde.15074

[CatHerd]

You missed the context and application. They even gave examples for you:

Examples:
*”Liberal”: We’ve heard about these conservatives and their tax “relief”.
*”Conservative”: The liberals have proposed yet another form of “common-sense” gun control.
*”Libertarian”: We’re disappointed with the liberals’ and conservatives’ “inclusive” debate.

Scare quotes are used for words and phrases commonly used by those being mocked. Liberals do indeed often use the phrase “common-sense gun control”.

I have *never* used *any* of the phrases you put in so-called “scare quotes”.

I see what you are doing here and other reasonable Freepers can as well. I wish you a pleasant day.