Posted on 08/18/2022 4:53:25 PM PDT by ransomnote
Oh, yes, his beach house, on the beach that will disappear due to global warming...the one with no solar panels.
So Easy, what is it exactly that you want? If you’re looking to get HG banned, I think you know already that’s not going to happen.
describe to us EXACTLY what it is you want. Use your big words or small, we, the unwashed masses, will suss it out.
Stephen Miller
@StephenM
Crippling inflation. Sky-high energy costs. Ceaseless illegal immigration flooding over an eradicated border. Looting, beating & killing sprees engulfing our cities. Completely avoidable war in Europe. A massive new middle class tax hike.
Media calls this Biden’s winning streak.
Biden will declare martial law after crime, illegal immigration, food shortages and inflation gets out of control.
The government will control everything.
FOREVER!!!
Can you vote under martial law in the US?
Yes. Unless the provisions of the US Constitution expressly says you can under a precise set of circumstances, no part of the Constitution can be legally infringed just because Martial Law or under any other law was declared. Voting is not one of those exceptions. To do so would be in of itself unconstitutional.
Get everyone to VOTE and VOTE RED!!!
MEN!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4087596/posts
The FBI isn’t even trying to hide their corruption (Lars Larson radio show, interviews Paul Sperry - 9 min audio)
ktsa.com ^ | 8/22/2022 | Lars Larson
Michigan
Sometimes I forget those people are devil worshippers. Thanks for the reminder, Maia.
p.s. The dude on the right looks like Don Knotts gone tranny.
I can’t speak for Easy but I want Dumbledore to get suspended just once even if it is only for one day.
I don’t know if that will ever happen but if it never does FR will die a slow and horrible death.
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/maga-commercial-for-nike-starring-the-donald/
MAGA commercial for Nike starring The Donald…
Excellent flashback from Carpe Donktum 2 min
Or the colored girl “computers” who were the brightest of the bright?
Sources: GSA Packed Boxes of Documents Trump Brought to Mar-a-Lago, Not Trump Political Staffers
Breitbart ^ | 8/22/22 | PAUL Boise
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4087592/posts?page=1
~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
`~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/nadler-fight-is-getting-ugly/
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/18/22 Vol.419, Q Day 1853, EasySt wrote: Yes, Bagster, Grey Whiskers, me and others post Q stuff beyond the trees and engage the trolls.
And you keep coming back to my desire to have folks on our side, by which
I always meant your side, my side, all OUR side of WWG1WGA hope and
discovery, not stalking or harassment or keeping our truths caged.“Our Side” is not a bad thing. And no one has to be a “Qtard” to be on it.
What are we about, MQD, if not hearts and minds?Sometimes the uncomfortable truths need airing.
I have to believe that it promotes improvement and positive change.
(& fewer nasty keywords and less stalking)Someone in FR management must agree with me, or I would have already
been timed out again and again. Perhaps Permanently.
The battle isn’t just here in this thread.It IS disruptive, and I never fail to shake and worry whether I do it Right,
or harmfully.So I try real hard to do it right, KNOWING it won’t be perfect, or painless, for anyone.
Right now, it think it is time for “future proves past” to pursue escape from its overt confinement.
I think Troll engagement beyond the trees provides one path.
I think engaging, directly or otherwise, the hopeless beyond the trees is another.
They need us. Badly.
There are as many paths to pursue to help us ALL out of this mess,
as there are people.Working in here and ignoring all insults and distractions is another, nothing
wrong with that at all, and that way is certainly less stressful or confrontational
than most others. My heart may eventually reduce even me to that.(Unless I find myself uninvited first.)
~Easy
Welp, your response was a complete, manipulative whitewash.
And you keep coming back to my desire to have folks on our side, by which
I always meant your side, my side, all OUR side
Our side is Q's side, which is Trump's side. You are specifically recruiting people to address your personal conflict with another FReeper and to only do so the way you want them addressed, insulting those who remain silent or otherwise have not signed on your recruitment effort. Those who show up on the thread with just enough time to dig, pray and post (productively) are targets of your barbed comments, as are any who believe your tactics are counterproductive.
“Our Side” is not a bad thing. And no one has to be a “Qtard” to be on it.
Of course not. We were never Qtards - that's just name calling. You seem to be saying you believe you ARE a Qtard if people name-call. Well we aren't Qtards, and we never were. People keep calling Trump a dictator and a traitor, and he never has been the epithet's he's been called.
What are we about, MQD, if not hearts and minds?
You're kidding, right? You've hinting those not supporting you are 'allowing evil to claim more souls':example, wanting others to be purged for speaking up: example, are 'cowering in the dark: example.
What happened to you, and Jim? What would the Jim we knew, do, if he could?
You even ask how Jim Rob and I have (morally) lost our way! You refer to the Jim 'we knew' in the past tense. THAT's your ethical stance???? You pretend that's just you, 'winning hearts and minds'?
I didn't address this particularly manipulative snark of yours (implying I lost my moral compass) because my instincts told me you wanted to provoke an emotional response, to personalize it when my comments to you about this issue are not personal. I believe you resort to these insults in order to lead away from exposure of your attention getting tactics on this thread, and of course, to call more attention to yourself.
In other words, I knew you were trolling me and I ignored it. See how that works? I address it here only because your pretense that you're just 'winning hearts and minds' was too much for my patience.
The battle isn’t just here in this thread.
No, it's in the forum. You simply CHOOSE to make it the centerpiece of this thread because you get more sympathy here than you do in the forum. It doesn't belong here.
It IS disruptive, and I never fail to shake and worry whether I do it Right,
or harmfully.
You are continuing in your efforts to disrupt the Q thread for your own personal agenda, not Q content.
I think Troll engagement beyond the trees provides one path.
I think engaging, directly or otherwise, the hopeless beyond the trees is another.
Some of us post in the forum; some of us are more productive on the Q thread. Again, you're specifying the forum but you never actual answer the question, "Why do you continue to disrupt our Q thread for battles supposedly taking place in the forum?" The Q thread is the one place with limits on those battles, and apparently you'd like to change that?
You display little respect for others' opinions, but I'll put mine forth anyway for our readers. We don't need to convert resistors to read Q drops now - we can just share Q content and/or wake them up by any means necessary. There are people in the forum watching the show without realizing or perhaps acknowledging where it came from; FINE! As long as they're watching the show. It's hard to quickly orient people just waking up now to 5 years of complex content they missed; some of which Anons still don't understand. Awake and on their (information war) feet is GOOD ENOUGH.
Ah, you close your post with another insult, because you're here winning hearts and minds:
"Working in here and ignoring all insults and distractions is another, nothing
wrong with that at all, and that way is certainly less stressful or confrontational
than most others. My heart may eventually reduce even me to that."It's not enough that you imply that those who don't follow you are simply taking the easiest route we could find; you had to add that 'even me' you wave in our faces.
I spend part of my time conflicting with people in the forum and I post on the Q thread. One path is not 'superior' to another. We all have different skills, different talents and we use them where they do the most good, when they do the most good. Our enemies are continuing the information war, and those of us here are not willing to abandon the battle and let them win. We're not leaving our posts. If you feel called, by your talents or inclinations, to serve in other ways, fine but don't keep insulting people who are called to the important tasks they are now performing.
Back when we were strictly limited to Q thread posts, Q acknowledged Free Republic's Q thread's information war contributions ('188', remember?). The information war is intensifying; our communication skills are needed more now. Meming, digging, praying and sharing info is not merely a path of least resistance; we continue to actively advance the information war with FReeQ analysis, memes, encouragement, resource sharing etc.
The Q thread is a haven of PRODUCTIVITY. We can share ideas efficiently, and the thread content becomes more concentrated with the content all here pull from the 4 corners of the web in contrast to thread dilution we face in the forum (we'd have to skip from thread to thread collecting info) and continuous trolling. Many in the forum read this thread, and we have our beloved LurQers here, picking up info and sharing it out in their real lives.
The message you seem intent on spreading is that we're lazy (seeking non confrontational comfort zone, less stress), neglecting our duties, and not doing our best. You're wrong, but you're not alone. We have another black-piller saying exactly the same thing. For those certain that the Q thread is just some unimportant backwater filled with those most interested in path-of-least-resistance tasks, I have to wonder why you're still here.
This is still a public forum page among many others, and you’re the public, along with everyone else. You’ve broken no rooles and contributed a Lot of reason to the thread conversations for a long time, always easy going. The prickly are always among us. Let them prickle, or don’t.
I respect your thesis for engaging. I get it. The thread is what it is, but a monastery it is not. You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t. The rest is noise, as Bannon says. 😊
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/18/22 Vol.419, Q Day 1853, RitaOK wrote: This is still a public forum page among many others, and you’re the public, along with everyone else. You’ve broken no rooles and contributed a Lot of reason to the thread conversations for a long time, always easy going. The prickly are always among us. Let them prickle, or don’t.
I respect your thesis for engaging. I get it. The thread is what it is, but a monastery it is not. You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t. The rest is noise, as Bannon says. 😊
You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
And together, you and Easy will continue to try to drive people off the Q thread and/or FR with insults? Do you not see the hypocrisy in Easy's supposed 'crusade' to halt insults directed at him in the forum while simultaneously insulting us on the Q thread? Are you blind to your own hypocrisy after criticizing us for 'sitting on our butts' all this time, and then failing to come up with a single answer when asked what elevates your efforts above ours?
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t.
Strategically, doesn't it seem like he may want to stop wondering aloud 'what happened to Jim Rob' if he'd like to Jim Rob's support? Asking for a friend.
“If you’re looking to get HG banned...”
“describe to us EXACTLY what it is you want.”
~~~~~~~
Sure thing. I am NOT looking to get HG banned.
or even treated like the rest of us, as nice as that would be.
We all already LONG knew that something prevents that.
Maybe I operate on some weird level that makes me hard to understand.
Let me try to explain what has already come of all of this.
Realize that HG is now already more than sufficiently marginalized,
and Mods are already being more careful about doing the sort of things
where he is concerned that were needlessly exposing Free Republic.
With all that already dealt with, may I answer your question about what I
(still) might want by asking a question of my own?
If now is not the time to broadly engage with our fellows,
to show them a basis for hope,
to help them prepare to weather the coming storm,
to help them face down the worst trolls in a united front,
to broadly give up the silliness of obeying a no longer tenable rule preventing
the presentation of highly currently pertinent “Q” information beyond the trees,
by those still here, still up to sharing what they have learned...
to demonstrate what we are really about...
to counter the despair...
to Welcome them to Team Determination, Team Hope, Team Prayer,
Team Research,
Team Justice,
Team MAGA,
Team News Now,
Team WWG1WGA...
Then When do you suppose that time might be?
~Easy
Mine: Your current wishlist, which curiously downplays your consistent adversarial objectives and instead stresses spreading hope, has been progressing for some time, performed by those with suitable skills and pursued by people in the forum who choose to research or read our threads. It's habbening, 'caged' or not.
Can you 'let' those currently serving important roles do so without disrupting this thread with unprovoked criticism and continued requests for support/sympathy (e.g., threat to leave FR for a break)? If your goals lay in the forum, can you go there and perform them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.