This is still a public forum page among many others, and you’re the public, along with everyone else. You’ve broken no rooles and contributed a Lot of reason to the thread conversations for a long time, always easy going. The prickly are always among us. Let them prickle, or don’t.
I respect your thesis for engaging. I get it. The thread is what it is, but a monastery it is not. You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t. The rest is noise, as Bannon says. 😊
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/18/22 Vol.419, Q Day 1853, RitaOK wrote: This is still a public forum page among many others, and you’re the public, along with everyone else. You’ve broken no rooles and contributed a Lot of reason to the thread conversations for a long time, always easy going. The prickly are always among us. Let them prickle, or don’t.
I respect your thesis for engaging. I get it. The thread is what it is, but a monastery it is not. You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t. The rest is noise, as Bannon says. 😊
You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
And together, you and Easy will continue to try to drive people off the Q thread and/or FR with insults? Do you not see the hypocrisy in Easy's supposed 'crusade' to halt insults directed at him in the forum while simultaneously insulting us on the Q thread? Are you blind to your own hypocrisy after criticizing us for 'sitting on our butts' all this time, and then failing to come up with a single answer when asked what elevates your efforts above ours?
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t.
Strategically, doesn't it seem like he may want to stop wondering aloud 'what happened to Jim Rob' if he'd like to Jim Rob's support? Asking for a friend.