In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/18/22 Vol.419, Q Day 1853, RitaOK wrote: This is still a public forum page among many others, and you’re the public, along with everyone else. You’ve broken no rooles and contributed a Lot of reason to the thread conversations for a long time, always easy going. The prickly are always among us. Let them prickle, or don’t.
I respect your thesis for engaging. I get it. The thread is what it is, but a monastery it is not. You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t. The rest is noise, as Bannon says. 😊
You get to speak just like everyone else here. You may critique at will, like anyone else.
And together, you and Easy will continue to try to drive people off the Q thread and/or FR with insults? Do you not see the hypocrisy in Easy's supposed 'crusade' to halt insults directed at him in the forum while simultaneously insulting us on the Q thread? Are you blind to your own hypocrisy after criticizing us for 'sitting on our butts' all this time, and then failing to come up with a single answer when asked what elevates your efforts above ours?
Someone who actually owns the house will let us know when we can’t.
Strategically, doesn't it seem like he may want to stop wondering aloud 'what happened to Jim Rob' if he'd like to Jim Rob's support? Asking for a friend.
My dear, calm thyself.
I quoted the writer’s assessment, which you mistakenly attribute to me.
As for “elevation”, and about me not answering questions... Since my thoughts are known, I thought your question was a trip to redundancy for my answer. After all, Volunteering locally is not a foreign concept to anyone that I know here or elsewhere.
Besides your tone wasn’t one of inquiry, or for the elevation of anything.
I had quoted an article. Compared to the story’s subject and his yeomans work getting the actual danged vote out and crying out for volunteers, I said, “And we call ourselves “digital warriors”, or similar. Period.
I didn’t understand your last lob. About “strategically” and about Mr. R and “sides”? I thought that “he” asked... “what happened to you and Jim Robinson”. Anyway, that’s a conversation above my paygrade.
Did you splice the quote, or, did I misread?
As for my driving people off the thread, you have no grounds to say that. Your own contribution in what I call Neon insults may chill a few.
Otherwise, I see several drop bys *To* the thread, and easily recognize that there is an explosion of news on the FR Front Page, as well as in alternative media, where most all of FR news comes from.
The Q thread without Q simply has more competition, even on FR.