Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough Confirmed: California Team Achieved Ignition
newsweek.com ^ | 8/12/22 AT 9:20 AM EDT | JESS THOMSON ON

Posted on 08/13/2022 12:57:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) National Ignition Facility (NIF) recorded the first case of ignition on August 8, 2021, the results of which have now been published in three peer-reviewed papers.

Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun and other stars: heavy hydrogen atoms collide with enough force that they fuse together to form a helium atom, releasing large amounts of energy as a by-product. Once the hydrogen plasma "ignites", the fusion reaction becomes self-sustaining, with the fusions themselves producing enough power to maintain the temperature without external heating.

Ignition during a fusion reaction essentially means that the reaction itself produced enough energy to be self-sustaining, which would be necessary in the use of fusion to generate electricity.

In this latest milestone at the LLNL, researchers recorded an energy yield of more than 1.3 megajoules (MJ) during only a few nanoseconds.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: california; fusion; haha; ignition; kevmo; llnl; nif; physics; yeahright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: BenLurkin

Great. A whole new way for the idiots to start wildfires.


61 posted on 08/13/2022 3:38:15 PM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
The moment fusion power becomes practical (if it ever does), the greenies will say that it's too dangerous and needs to be banned.
62 posted on 08/13/2022 3:51:47 PM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

Mark. For a nanofoot.


63 posted on 08/13/2022 3:57:32 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

64 posted on 08/13/2022 4:01:35 PM PDT by SlipperySlope99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

Ten nanoseconds = one shake. (from the world of nuclear physics)


65 posted on 08/13/2022 4:05:03 PM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) National Ignition Facility (NIF) recorded the first case of ignition on August 8, 2021,...

Well, I know that's bogus* because "Ivy Mike" (November first, 1952) most assuredly was a "case of [fusion] ignition."


* ... because the word "controlled" appears nowhere in the article.

66 posted on 08/13/2022 4:48:13 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

Nanosecond: The time it takes for light to travel one foot.


67 posted on 08/13/2022 5:03:04 PM PDT by bosco24 (EOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

My nuclear physics professors told me that fusion reactors will not be the hollowed solution people want it to be. It will make a large number of unwanted byproducts. Also, since high gravity isn’t present, it will be very difficult to hold the fusion mass in place for the process. Keep in mind that these fusion experiments do not involve much mass and that it takes a rather large laser to perform the ignition. It won’t be feasible to scale this up.


68 posted on 08/13/2022 5:03:23 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Think about them making a black hole.


69 posted on 08/13/2022 5:04:24 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I want my fusion Micropile that Asimov promised 70 some years ago.


70 posted on 08/13/2022 5:09:33 PM PDT by Conan the Librarian (Conan the Sailing Librarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
I suspect they had a mechanism to remove the fuel.

Actually, all of the fuel they could squeeze into the magnetic containment was already in place. There wasn't much of it. It takes either a great deal of gravity or a truly healthy magnetic field to do this. We don't manipulate gravity. It will take a big mass to make this hold together on its own, like for example, our sun. The energy required for the magnetic pinch plus the energy needed by the ignition laser was a great deal more than that two nano-second fusion produced.

71 posted on 08/13/2022 5:10:12 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian
How many shakes of a lamb’s tail is that?

That is the amount of time it takes light to travel about ten inches.

72 posted on 08/13/2022 5:11:13 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

“It won’t be feasible to scale this up.”

That certainly seems to be the case for the last 50 years.

Even the Rooskies haven’t gotten close.

Still a fun idea though....


73 posted on 08/13/2022 5:12:08 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ETCM
Maybe fusion created helium

Fusion created all of the heavier elements. The sun starts with hydrogen and then makes everything else. Well, our sun isn't massive enough to make the heavier elements any longer. It is getting tired.

74 posted on 08/13/2022 5:13:16 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

OOopsie....

DOE’s bad.


75 posted on 08/13/2022 5:14:27 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

My gut feeling is that magnetic containment will never work. The fusion reaction opposes that containment. I think fusion needs a deep gravity well because the reaction has no properties which oppose gravity.


76 posted on 08/13/2022 5:24:29 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Well then, gravity amplifiers are in order to be developed.


77 posted on 08/13/2022 5:27:10 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
gravity amplifiers are in order to be developed

What to you think about forming a company together and obtaining a few federal grants?

78 posted on 08/13/2022 5:28:33 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Ca$h is King.

I’m in.


79 posted on 08/13/2022 6:18:37 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Inventing and developing Gravity Op Amps would be a good first focus.


80 posted on 08/13/2022 6:23:18 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson