Posted on 08/10/2022 3:22:42 PM PDT by bitt
New details on Mar-a-Lago raid come to light
As reported earlier today — President Trump declassified a binder on January 19th, 2021 that contains hundreds of pages about the Crossfire Hurricane scandal. It contains damaging information about the corrupt actors involved with our government. Two different DOJ Attorney General’s have defied President Trump’s direct lawful order to publish the binder in the Federal Register. It’s been 19 months as the DOJ defies the order, and every FOIA request to make it public. Can we now raid the homes of acting AG Monty Wilkinson, and Merrick Garland?
The DOJ had already made redactions to protect sources & methods, and returned the binder back to the White House. But the corrupt FBI also wanted to hide names. So at the last minute, the DOJ demanded the binder comply with the 1974 Privacy Act. The Act requires any “agency” that releases records to also hide personal or identifiable name information. The DOJ knew this Act doesn’t apply to the White House, it was a stall tactic. The courts decided this 22 years ago that the Privacy Act was based around FOIA requests, and the White House is not an agency.
Hours before Trump left office on January 20th, Chief of Staff Mark Meadows gave the binder back to the DOJ, along with this memo. He asked the DOJ to make any Privacy Act redactions “out of an abundance of caution”. In the memo he asks they expeditiously release the binder when finished. Meadows foolishly expected this would take 3-4 days. It’s been 19 months and still not released. Just the News recently obtained the Meadows memo from the National Archives, who also denied having a copy of the declassified binder.
Meadows admits in interviews various agency’s often stalled or defied Trump’s orders. Meadows knew better than to rely on the DOJ to release this damaging binder after they left the White House. He should have released the binder to the public himself. But in doing so, there was a chance he would become a target of the DOJ and FBI. The memorandum below is what Mr. Meadows sent to the DOJ Attorney General on January 20th, 2021.
Now this– New details on Monday’s raid of Mar-a-Lago may offer an explanation on what the FBI was looking for and why the FBI has not released the Spygate documents as they were ordered to when President Trump left office.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry had his Twitter account taken down for the second time on Monday.
Sperry had his first Twitter account removed after he identified Eric Ciaramella as the leaker in the first Trump impeachment trial.
Sperry had his second account takedn down on Monday after he tweeted about the Mar-a-Lago raid and what the FBI was looking for.
According to Paul Sperry, the FBI agenst spent 9 hours looking for details President Trump took with him on the Crossfire Hurricane FBI spying scandal.
The FBI and DOJ cannot let the American public know the truth of the their criminal acts and attempted coup of President Trump. So they raided his home looking for the documents that may indict the organization.
Cristina Laila reported this earlier today. REPORT: FBI Confidential Human Source Told FBI What Documents Trump Stored at Mar-a-Lago and Where to Search…. Related to Spygate?
Zero Hedge reported:
Twitter has suspended journalist Paul Sperry after he made several tweets about this week’s FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, where they spent up to 9 hours rifling through the former president’s private office, Melania Trump’s wardrobe, and eventually took 12 boxes of material…
Sperry: “DEVELOPING: Investigators reportedly met back in June w Trump & his lawyers in Mar-a-Lago storage rm to survey docs & things seemed copasetic but then FBI raids weeks later. Speculation on Hill FBI had PERSONAL stake & searching for classified docs related to its #Spygate scandal.”
...MORE
P
That would explain the absolute STASI overkill.
The safe was empty so I understand.
Even our own (Oklahoma) RINO Jim Lankford: “Lankford also said the DOJ and the FBI were becoming too politicized.”
And why Trump came out swinging, something the guilty would generally refrain from.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry had his Twitter account taken down for the second time on Monday.
Sperry had his first Twitter account removed after he identified Eric Ciaramella as the leaker in the first Trump impeachment trial.
Sperry had his second account takedn down on Monday after he tweeted about the Mar-a-Lago raid and what the FBI was looking for.
—
Big tech plays its vital role in our fascist government, making sure no actual reporting of anything detrimental to the regime ever sees the light of day.
Trump is dumb as a box of rocks.
Everyone knows that if you want to hide anything from the FBI you simply download it onto Hunter Biden’s laptop!
GP - whatever
The question is did the FBI locate and take the binder?
So, unless those items were listed on the warrant, this was merely a strong armed robbery. That could change things a bit.
That sounds like a plausible theory to me.
Since the safe was the target, and Erik Trump (?) said it was empty, could that have been a set up to find the mole in the house, I wonder?
Trump is unpredictable. He thinks outside the box.
I saw another story on this but did not give it to much credence until this story broke.
Was there more than one copy? If so, where oh where could it be?
Trump should come out and say - yes I have those documents of course.
I will say this has been and interesting week. Looks like a lot more to come.
Fellow OKIE....Lankford is RINO no two ways about it.
For arguments sake let’s say this is true. It may be an indication that they are afraid they are going to lose the House and an actual investigation takes place. Trump holding this info will be clear and present danger to these treasonous bastards.
They were informed the docs were in the safe. They broke in the safe...then Eric Trump released a statement that the safe was empty. Lol, I’ll bet the docs are somewhere safe and sound. So will the corrupt DOJ.
I don’t think that anyone said that the safe was empty. Eric Trump said “there was nothing in it”. My interpretation of that is that there was nothing in it of value to the FBI.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.