Posted on 08/05/2022 10:05:37 AM PDT by Blueflag
Here's the net - 'vaccines" kinda work, but there is no need to continue with successive boosters, and there is good science to support this.'
because of how the COVID "vaccines" work, the more you are 'vaccinated' and boosted the more likely you are to be infected, reinfected, and transmit COVID-XX. The article doesn't recommend against the initial vaccine, except for young people, but does present the logical conclusion : "There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal and medrxiv. The two studies supporting this conclusion are: (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
Synopsis/ money quotes follow
"Instead of stopping the virus, it appears that the mRNA vaccination programs around the world may have inadvertently made the virus more ubiquitous. ...
This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. ...
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated. ...
Another study, published in July by a team of more than 20 German scientists, independently confirmed that successive COVID-19 shots and boosters were converting the immune response from the protective class of IgG response to the toleration class ... So the vaccine and booster program have ended up doing the opposite of what was intended to do: keeping people from getting sick.
... naturally acquired immunity appears to be stronger than vaccine acquired immunity, and the dangers of the vaccines themselves, especially for young people, suggest that the risks of vaccination far outweigh the benefits.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
But the booster shots were never necessary to produce tolerance: the study showed that the subjects started developing tolerance after only two doses. The vaccines may have helped desensitize the population to harmful inflammatory immune responses to COVID-19. They have played their part. There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal. There were two studies supporting this conclusion. (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
A tad wonky about immunology, but good stuff.
The two studies supporting this conclusion are: (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
Synopsis/ money quotes follow
"Instead of stopping the virus, it appears that the mRNA vaccination programs around the world may have inadvertently made the virus more ubiquitous. ... This study demonstrates exactly how the repeat vaccinations are causing people to be more susceptible to COVID-19. ...
The participants’ response to COVID-19 had actually been turned off, making them even more vulnerable to infection and less likely to mount a response to it than those who had never been vaccinated. ...
Another study, published in July by a team of more than 20 German scientists, independently confirmed that successive COVID-19 shots and boosters were converting the immune response from the protective class of IgG response to the toleration class ... So the vaccine and booster program have ended up doing the opposite of what was intended to do: keeping people from getting sick. ... naturally acquired immunity appears to be stronger than vaccine acquired immunity, and the dangers of the vaccines themselves, especially for young people, suggest that the risks of vaccination far outweigh the benefits.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
But the booster shots were never necessary to produce tolerance: the study showed that the subjects started developing tolerance after only two doses. The vaccines may have helped desensitize the population to harmful inflammatory immune responses to COVID-19. They have played their part. There is no need to continue with successive boosters."
This is actual peer-reviewed science, published in the peer-reviewed SCIENCE journal. There were two studies supporting this conclusion. (1) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841 and (2) https://www.medrxiv.org/con.../10.1101/2022.07.05.22277189v1
I’m sure CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, FOX, WSJ, NYT, WaPo will be all over this.
Dr. Scott Atlas (among many others) was saying this early during COVID. He was on Trump’s COVID team. He was mercilessly ridiculed and hounded forever until he was forced to quit Trump’s team.
Victor Davis Hanson (who is at Stanford’s Hoover Institution) says the ridicule and derision continued after he got back to Stanford. He was declared unfit to be a doctor and was threatened with loss of career and income.
Will these people ever apologize to Dr. Atlas and the many others that warned against this from the beginning?
So, the vaccine basically gives people COVID. Great.
If the vaccinated are now readily getting the virus but having only mild reactions because their immune systems are telling them to tolerate it, this may have been a benefit to vaccination.
And how can you really KNOW that? Sounds like wishful thinking/excuse making to me.
One of the first things they ever said about COVID was -- some people die, some people get really sick, and some people just get the sniffles.
Pretending that the people who got jabbed are less likely to die and will be more likely to just get the sniffles seems pretty hard to prove.
Makes sense if the initial immunity was so great but quickly fell...it did NOT kill the virus...not one little bit...and looks like it killed your natural immunity in the process.
The problem with this kind of information is that those who have already joined the cult won’t read it and if they did they won’t believe it. I’ve got a brother-in-law who says he’s ready for the fifth shot when it comes out. I quit telling him anything, I quit sending him anything when he made it clear he thought I was a kook.
I’ve reached the point where I really don’t care what happens to the members of the fake vax cult
Rain is wet, the sun rises in the East, and COVID shots kill more people than they save....YAWN. Is there anyone out there that doesn’t know these 3 truisms?
First link falsifies article.
————First Link-———————
Vaccine boosting results in distinct, imprinted patterns of hybrid immunity with different combinations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Immune protection is boosted by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection in the triple-vaccinated, previously infection-naïve individuals, but this boosting is lost with prior Wuhan Hu-1 imprinting.
the people that claim the vaccines are “safe and effective” also claim men can cut off their junk and convert to women...
Country after highly-vaccinated country saw enormous spikes in Covid cases about a year after the vaccines began to be rolled out. Among them are Japan, Vietnam, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand.
People wanted a vaccine.
People expected a vaccine.
A vaccine offers reasonable protection against contracting the disease, and also blocks transmission of the virus to others.
The COVID jab does neither of these things.
So they changed the definition of "vaccine" to mean "something which helps you feel better when you get sick".
That's not Science. That's fraud.
OMICRON = MORONIC
DELTA OMICRON = MEDIA CONTROL
Have to read the part about immunoglobin and tolerance again.
Folks may not write clearly, but read the conclusions —
Tolerance rose, and so did infections/transmissions.
Natural immunity remains best, providing you survived and are healthy.
Severity was lessened due to tolerance/ inflammation reduction.
Tolerance was achieved after only 2 ‘vaccines’ and boosters didn’t improve population health or infection/transmission rates.
HEre’s my takeaway - boosters lack efficacy due to the way the mRNA ‘vaccine’ works. No demonstrated need to get the boosters. Vaccines yes, boosters no.
On mobile now, so excuse brevity and errors.
We must be reading different articles. Which are younreferring to?
BTTT…
Did I get the link wrong? (it could happen)
The *accurate* links are embedded in the original Epoch Times article. I was doind a lot of reading/surfing earlier. BEst answer is to blame me ;-)
“The *accurate* links are embedded in the original Epoch Times article. “
I don’t see the OP first link I was referencing in the ET article.
Where’s gas dr to tell me this is faulty research and the jabs are better than a healthy immune system?
Clear_Case Guy :
“People wanted a vaccine.
.People expected a vaccine.
A vaccine offers reasonable protection against contracting the disease, and also blocks transmission of the virus to others.
The COVID jab does neither of these things.
So they changed the definition of "vaccine" to mean "something which helps you feel better when you get sick".
ClearCase_Guy : “That's not Science. That's fraud. “
(My Comment): Exactly true !
Even Birx ( the scarf lady) admits that control over the covid-19 virus was wishful thinking
That is also why they had to re-write the definition of "vaccine".
Also, there are some good and intelligent comments following the article.
PING
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.