Skip to comments.
Expect censorship of the word "recession" soon
Posted on 07/28/2022 7:18:27 AM PDT by Thunder90
Consistent with past events and to protect the Democrats, expect companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Alphabet to restrict posts, censor the word recession, and issue bans and time outs for using the word.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: biden; letsgobrandon; poopypantsbiden; recession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Post any examples of censorship on the new recession in this thread.
1
posted on
07/28/2022 7:18:27 AM PDT
by
Thunder90
To: Thunder90
2
posted on
07/28/2022 7:19:42 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
( )
To: Thunder90
And Meta (FB)............................
3
posted on
07/28/2022 7:20:20 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Red Badger
4
posted on
07/28/2022 7:20:56 AM PDT
by
Thunder90
(All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
To: Thunder90
They’ll be labelled as “recessionists”.
Can it be long before the DOJ/FBI are brought in to start hunting them down?
5
posted on
07/28/2022 7:22:43 AM PDT
by
Starboard
To: Vaduz
Yep......
Expect Censorship of the word “RECESSION” soon.
Consistent with past events and to protect the Democrats, expect companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Alphabet to restrict posts, censor the word recession, and issue bans and time outs for using the word.
6
posted on
07/28/2022 7:23:42 AM PDT
by
ncfool
(Joe Biden USSA.. United Socialist state of aMeriKa...... 11.3.2020 - President in waiting Kama-la-la)
To: Thunder90
To: ncfool
Let us try to predict the name-calling they will have in their arsenal:
—Economy deniers
—Economy conspiracy theorists
—Doomers
Feel free to add to the list.
8
posted on
07/28/2022 7:25:54 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
To: cgbg
9
posted on
07/28/2022 7:27:28 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: Thunder90
I was in FB Jail for 24 hours this week.
I’m doing my part! *SMIRK*
10
posted on
07/28/2022 7:28:13 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: cgbg
11
posted on
07/28/2022 7:28:34 AM PDT
by
NEMDF
To: Thunder90
Good. Tired of hearing about the recession of my hairline.
12
posted on
07/28/2022 7:38:43 AM PDT
by
moovova
To: mikelets456
...said Ryan Sweet, who leads real-time economics at Moody’s Analytics. “We’re not in a recession.”
—
\CNN’s economic version of “mostly peaceful”.
To: Thunder90
What about Stagflation? Or, Misery Index.
14
posted on
07/28/2022 7:39:46 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Thunder90
So what’s going on here?
We are in a recession, but the Democrats and White House find this inconvenient truth to be troublesome.
So the response, is to change the definition of a recession, so now we aren’t officially in a recession?
Because we have changed the definition of what a recession is?
How convenient.
Would the Trump administration, any Republican or conservative, be able to get away with changing the definition of terminology, to disguise bad news???
To: cgbg
“Let us try to predict the name-calling they will have in their arsenal:
—Economy deniers
—Economy conspiracy theorists
—Doomers
Feel free to add to the list”.
Utopia deniers?
16
posted on
07/28/2022 7:49:25 AM PDT
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: mikelets456
While admitting that consumer spending had dropped; and while admitting that production of goods and services had “slowed significantly”; and while admitting that consumers have “lower real disposable incomes and tighter financial conditions; and while stating that “activity in the housing sector had weakened”, housing purchases have fallen; and while accepting that “business fixed investment seems to have declined in the second quarter,” Fed Chairman Powell announces his intention to continue targeting excessive demand.
If we accept that monetary policy can only impact the demand side of the economy (regulatory policy impacting the supply side); and if we accept all off the currently existing realities of a declining demand side, as outlined by Powell; then you might wonder what excessive demand is it that he’s targeting? The answer to that question is the secret sauce. They want less energy demand.
WATCH (2 mins):
The federal reserve, just like all the central banks around the collective western alliance, is trying to reduce the economy in order to reduce energy use. This is the monetary policy side supporting the Build Back Better, Climate Change, regulatory policy side. {Go Deep}
They cannot admit openly what they are doing, but the bankers are trying to help the globalist politicians by shrinking their economy. Raising interest rates into preexisting economic contraction is against their legislative mandate, because it only leads to unemployment and a smaller economy.
Powell is using the pretense of demand side inflation as a justification to raise interest rates. It’s not demand driving inflation, it’s the energy policy.
Powell is managing the monetary side of the transition to a New Green Deal economy.
Powell is managing the economy into a recession to support the “energy transition”.
This is all being done on purpose.
[…] Mr. Powell said in his news conference following the Fed’s decision to raise rates by by 75 basis points that future rate decisions will be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis now that the federal funds rate target range is between 2.25% and 2.5%, which he deemed roughly neutral in terms of its impact on economic activity.
Mr. Powell said the 75-basis-point moves in June and July were unusually large and something similar at the September FOMC “could be appropriate.” But he said that the Fed can no longer provide “clear guidance” and will let the data determine what happens next. He said he still believes monetary policy will need to move to a restrictive stance and will likely be between 3% and 3.5% by year end. (LINK)
17
posted on
07/28/2022 7:49:58 AM PDT
by
Bratch
To: Thunder90
18
posted on
07/28/2022 7:51:15 AM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: Thunder90
Not censorship, but denial...
Capital Economics Senior U.S. Economist Andrew Hunter indicated in a note that while the GDP reading was “disappointing,” it did not necessarily indicate that the economy is in a recession.
The government’s preliminary reading on second-quarter GDP — the broadest measure of economic activity — comes one day after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told reporters at a press conference that he did not believe the economy is in a recession, even as other economic indicators show signs of softening.
The decline in GDP comes after U.S. economic activity unexpectedly fell 1.6% during the first quarter, the first negative reading since the second quarter of 2020. Two straight negative GDP prints meets the unofficial definition of a recession.
{see how they mean to re-define the word}
19
posted on
07/28/2022 7:53:31 AM PDT
by
Rio
To: ncfool
20
posted on
07/28/2022 8:14:45 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
( )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson