Posted on 07/25/2022 4:12:28 AM PDT by MtnClimber
On July 8, 2022, Tucker Carlson laid out an extensive indictment against the Chinese Communist Party, Joe Biden, the media, and the medical establishment regarding COVID. For me, there have always been nagging and inescapable questions about the pandemic. In my mind, the timing was always just too convenient. Tucker’s monologue re-ignited my curiosity and the questions have arisen once more. Maybe it’s just me, but…
In late January 2020, the first COVID-19 case was diagnosed in the United States. At that time, America was strong, even on the rise. There was energy independence and, before the pandemic-induced shutdowns, supply chains were working as they should, gas prices were reasonable, the workforce participation was at all-time highs, and every American who wanted to work could work. Every racial, ethnic, and cultural demographic was benefitting from the strong economy, and wages and salaries were increasing.
Yet behind the scenes, almost certainly in violation of federal law, U.S. taxpayers were funding virus research in China, including a particularly dangerous type of research—“gain of function,” meaning the researchers take a naturally occurring virus from the animal kingdom and “jack it up” genetically, to make it infectious to humans. A “novel” virus.
Presumably, this GOF research would make our virologists, epidemiologists, immunologists, and the broader medical establishment better equipped to handle the next epidemic. Presumably, this GOF research was all for the sake of prevention. If the theoretical goal was to increase our knowledge of viruses so medicines could be developed, and lives could be saved, how utterly ironic that, now, over 6 million lives have been lost worldwide.
This GOF research was taking place in China because it is too d@#n dangerous to permit it here in the United States. Therefore, the people who perpetrated the necessary funding sleight-of-hand laundered the money
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Thought this was an attack with a bioweapon from the very beginning, it was obvious and many knew it and we all have set and watched the election stolen, invasion from the southern boarder and the pandemic that was and the bio attack and we all have set on our hands and if we didn’t we were jailed without a trial and all on the right have had their voices censored by social media and MSM as all of us Nero’s fiddle with elections while America burns.
“The greatest crime of our lifetimes”
Just happened to have occurred in an election year to take down a President that survived daily attacks, impeachments and was still winning. Does anyone have to wonder why the election was stolen, at all cost? Had Trump won a second term, those involved in the greatest crime of our lifetime, would have been exposed, making the Nuremberg trials look like Judge Judy.
The masters of the Chinese communist mob are medieval-minded monsters making war on the Christian west. And “useful idiots” like Fauci and Collins and Bill Gates and the heads of the technocracy energetically support the murderous, enslaving agenda of the monsters.
We must make sure the voting machines are taken off-line for the mid-terms, or the monsters will have another victory.
There is an article in the Epoch Times about this.
You may need to be a subscriber to access the article via the link, so I have copied the full text it below.
Event 201 Pandemic Exercise in 2019 Portended Climate of Internet Censorship
By Ken Silva
October 18, 2021 Updated: October 19, 2021
Just weeks before the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed, a group of elite government officials, business people, and scientists gathered in New York to plan various strategies for steering society through a deadly pandemic.
The scenario may sound like some sort of a conspiracy theory, but it happened two years ago.
On Oct. 18, 2019, the World Economic Forum, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted “Event 201”—a “high-level pandemic exercise,” during which world leaders simulated various policy responses to a global disease outbreak.
When the initial diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed just weeks later, speculation abounded about the similarities—so many so that organizers issued a response.
While no hard evidence has been produced to substantiate the speculation, Event 201 did portend how many of the same global institutions would respond to some of the issues that arose from COVID-19 months later—including how they would push information censorship.
Event participants included then-Columbia University senior research scholar Avril Haines, who is now the U.S. Director of National Intelligence; Chris Elias, the president of the global development program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; George Gao, the director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; and Stephen Redd, then-deputy director for public health service and implementation science at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The participants were presented with a simulated outbreak of “novel zoonotic coronavirus” transmitted from bats to pigs to people, leading to a severe pandemic.
“The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings,” according to the Event 201 scenario.
“It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries are able to control it, it continues to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country can maintain control,” it stated.
Participants were presented with policy decisions for four broad categories: medical response, travel and trade, finance, and communications.
On some issues, Event 201 was divergent from the real-life pandemic—perhaps most prominently with respect to travel and lockdowns, as Event 201 didn’t recommend lockdowns and was explicitly opposed to travel restrictions.
“Countries, international organizations, and global transportation companies should work together to maintain travel and trade during severe pandemics,” Event 201 said in its recommendations. “Travel and trade are essential to the global economy as well as to national and even local economies, and they should be maintained even in the face of a pandemic.”
But on communications, the recommendations from Event 201 are similar to those that followed COVID-19—as were the actual events.
During the simulation, for instance, Gao said that “disinformation” spread throughout China and the rest of the world.
“There is misinformation, and people believe that this is a man-made—that a pharmaceutical company made the virus,” he said, adding that there were “deaths because of this misinformation.”
Redd also said there was misinformation related to treatments.
“We’re seeing instances of people trying treatments that are purported to be effective, but actually are harmful,” he said during the simulation.
During the simulated pandemic, some countries resorted to shutting down the internet to quell panic. Others worked with social media companies to censor what those states deemed misinformation.
Participants expressed opposition to internet shutdowns, but they agreed governments should work with social media companies to control the narrative.
Event 201 organizers made similar recommendations following the simulation.
“Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation,” the organizers stated. “For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including through the use of technology.”
Redd also said government should surveil social media to fight disinformation.
“With social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that is susceptible, and in what form, to misinformation. So, I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism,” said Redd, who has since retired. “With that ability, we can identify false information more quickly.”
Event 201 policies manifested following COVID-19, with governments and big tech platforms working in concert to surveil and censor content on numerous pandemic-related subjects.
During and following the discussions, it was revealed that the simulated pandemic resulted in 450,000 cases and 26,000 deaths within one month, 10 million cases and 660,000 deaths within three months, and 65 million deaths in the first 18 months. Participants were urged to prep their various sectors for a similar public health crisis.
The first confirmed case of COVID-19 was found to be within weeks of the Oct. 18, 2019, simulated pandemic.
When conspiracy theories began to spread about the relationship between the two events, organizers issued a response.
“Recently, the [Johns Hopkins] Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise,” Johns Hopkins stated on Jan. 24, 2020.
“For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction,” organizers added. “We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.”
“I never thought this was an accident from the get-go. The timing was impeccable for it to be an attack on America, to bring her to her knees, and get rid of President Trump.”
! X2 It was obvious. Hardly any of us on FR fell for it.
” i watched Barky Obama say in a televised news blurb, before Trump was sworn in, ‘Mr Trump will have to deal with a pandemic.’”
In 2017, someone said that. I thought it was Fauci, but maybe it was Hussein instead (or also).
“40 million cases of flu in 2018 down to 1,600 in ‘20-’21 flu season?”
Just a coincidence, I’m sure. (Is /s necessary?)
The timing was no accident. Trump had the economy roaring. He had restored jobs for Blacks and women. He favored the interests of the USA and not those of China or Iran.
The dems were furious. They had lost power. Power is everything to them, and they were ready to do anything to regain it.
What better way to get rid of Trump than to make millions sick and blame it on Trump? They specifically and clearly blamed it all on Trump. When thousands were thrown out of work and businesses closed, they blamed it all on Trump.
The pandemic was engineered so the left could regain power.
The left is willing to do it again, with a slightly different name, if they need to. They are obsessed with keeping Trump from office. They will do absolutely anything to block him.
Excellent article.
Fauci said early in 1/20 that 1. Masks don’t work 2. Covid was just a bad flu.
After Davos he did a 180.
Scamdemic.
“The mere fact that millions of useful idiots and sheep 🐑🐑🐑 listen to him is a sad statement on the current state of the world.”
It is that, indeed.
And I still see Covidiots driving down the road, alone in their vehicle, with masks on. They have drunk deeply at the Covid Kool-Ade tub.
I did it, sometimes, driving to local work because it was less than 3 miles to get there and I’d sometimes forget it.
Yeah it was uncomfortable even the few times I did it. But worse all dang day long.
They almost had me for the first week or two of it. Though I was already rolling my eyes 🙄 at the absurdity of much of what I heard and saw.
Then it was push push push push push push push.
Then came the shot 💉 - no way I said. No way.
Thanks for posting. BTTT
The only real question is, was it China’s idea or did the dems or the globalists order themselves up a designer virus from China?
Part of me also wonders; If Hillary had won 2016, was it already a plan to release this under her admin to use for power grab purposes?
Taken further; Considering all Western nations acted in concert, it also seems like all Western nations and Big Pharma already had a script to work from. Dr Peter Breggins’ book shows how Bill Gates’ CEPI came up with a plan years back that basically describes Warp Speed to a T. Klaus Schwab came out with his book, The Great Reset in early 2020 talking about how to use the plandemic to kick off their Great Reset. Gates and co put on Event 201 in late 2019 and it was facilitated by the WEF.
Every Western nation has at least one WEF Young Global Leader in their government and in many, they’re Prime Minister or some other high position that had the most input when it came to lockdowns and mandates. Canada has two top pols including Trudeau that are WEF and you still can’t go in or out of Canada unless you’re jabbed.
All the nations enacting limits on nitrogen lines up with the UN’s 2030 Agenda, WEF 2030 Vision. The UN and WEF are starting to cooperate with each other more and more. The WHO just tried a power grab for global control over plandemics with input from the Biden admin. It’s been shelved for now.
At Davos, they have public talks which are scary enough but they also have private meetings and who knows what they talk about or plan at those. Many Bilderberg members or attendees are now WEF Davos members/attendees. Who knows what goes on in private at those G7, G20 summits. National leaders have been gathering for decades. It should be no surprise that eventually they’d come up with a common cause or common enemy, us. Since the economy went global on steroids, I think a lot of them like what they see in China. Complete control of the worker drones.
Fauxi said it. Don’t know about abama
I remember that “dark winter” business. Biden did have a tendency to blurt things out. We can recall when he stated that “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
How long did it take for them to admit that the PCR tests couldn’t tell the difference between covid, the flu or common cold? Even then, once they announce it, they didn’t stop using them until months later. Came out in Aug I think and then said we’ll stop using them in Dec. And everyone just said, uh, ok then.
How many people finally gave in and went ahead and got the jab based on cases, cases and more cases when it was due to faulty PCR tests that were also being used improperly, cycling them too many times, which caused even more false positives. The whole effort to get the jabs into every single person on the planet is something else. We really can’t say fr sure if it’s all about control, Pavlov training or if there’s something more to that mRNA stuff.
Feb 2015 - WEF - RNA - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qECgqd6wJb0
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.