So, Australia produces 1.3% of the 3% co2 produced by the world’s people.
its all by design....can’t get your next trillion dollar money flows unless you demand that the sheeple change their whole lives, buy all new cars, trucks, appliances, houses etc to accommodate the beast’s appetite.
The delusional thinking of the woke crowd
A lot of governments suffer from Delusional Disorder
Please, someone develop a plan to remove power from these insane women. They never, ever should have power.
.o4% or .o4?
Either way, it’s infinitesmal
It was never about the planet, it was always about control.
They have duped people into believing their own exhalations are pollution.
Man made contributions to that are 3.225% of that .03%.
So that's what the modern day "bitch slap" (often used figuratively) looks like.
Aside - It's a shame I have to explain that just to stay out of trouble these days.
Some people get insane over words/phrase so it can't hurt.
Me: Baby.
Them: FETUS!
Oh, wait. Is that mansplaining? /irony
Have you heard the latest line of climate BS? They are trying to demonize nitrogen now, which is 76% of the atmosphere.
This has already been used as an excuse to run farmers in Europe out of business because there is nitrogen in their fertilizer.
Apparently those stupid farmers think plants need nitrogen or something and are willing to kill the planet to grow food.
More than 3% of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is from humanity. At least net.
Water vapor contributes more to global warming. We need to ban water.
In the meantime...google...pie graph...atmosphere. Many available. It'll be a wakeup call.
It’s even worse than those numbers. If you got rid of 100% of CO2 all plants would die, so they really want us to go back to .03% of the atmosphere versus.04%.
So the calculation is It is 0.04%. Of that, only 3% is man made CO2. And of that, Australia produces 1.3%. AND OF THAT only 25@% is above historic norms.
And to think there a company in Iceland working to suck co2 out of the atmosphere
Gee, it almost sounds like CO2 is a trace element and really much of anything, considering trace elements are just along for the ride y definition.
For the record, the rebuttal for CLIMATE DUMBASSES from a US perspective is:
“For 13% of 3% of 0.04% of the atmosphere, we’re going to commit economic suicide.”
(Yes, almost exactly 10x that of Australia. I did the math ;-) )
It’s not about the environment.
It’s about a-holes grasping for control.
Just wondering - since CO2 is heavier than O2 or N2, is its distribution weighted to different atmospheric heights?