Posted on 07/11/2022 6:14:50 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Two top-level American atmospheric scientists have dismissed the peer review system of current climate science literature as “a joke”. According to Emeritus Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen, “it is pal review, not peer review”. The two men have had long distinguished careers in physics and atmospheric science. “Climate science is awash with manipulated data, which provides no reliable scientific evidence,” they state.
No reliable scientific evidence can be provided either by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), they say, which is “government-controlled and only issues government dictated findings”. The two academics draw attention to an IPCC rule that states all summaries for policymakers are approved by governments. In their opinion, these summaries are “merely government opinions”. They refer to the recent comments on climate models by the atmospheric science professor John Christy from the University of Alabama, who says that, in his view, recent climate model predictions “fail miserably to predict reality”, making them “inappropriate” to use in predicting future climate changes.
The ’miserable failure’ is graphically displayed below. Since the observations cut-off, global temperatures have again paused.
(Excerpt) Read more at alethonews.com ...
” no kidding?”
A lot of power, too. Commies lie. Always.
Not money.
Power.
Like someone much smarter than me said,”just follow the money”.
” no kidding?”
Oh C’mon man
It should be stated that ANY model is an abstraction of reality. It a model had all the components of reality, it would then be real. Keep that in mind about any model. It’s not science. It is conjecture that can only be proven by events occurring in the future. It’s not classical science where you begin with a hypothesis, develop experiments to prove or disprove the hypothesis. When you are on to something, peers try to replicate the experiment and poke holes in the hypothesis. Models can only be peer reviewed by running the same data through the same program. It’s sort of like running fraudulent election ballots thru fraudulent vote counting machines. Kinda funny that all so-called climate change scientists are Democrats and Commies. They cannot win without cheating.
BOTH…massive power to control the plebes AND tons of money to be made, top to bottom. Different groups of people interested in power vs money, but they march in concert and support each other.
There are probably 1,000 or 10,000 times more people who want money rather than naked power.
welcome to the party, pal
This is true and very important.
They have made it in to a religion and are using it, and plan to use it more and more, for their totalitarian agenda.
And it is total nonsense.
It’s plays out as superstition.
It is hard to stand up to the irrational juggernaut though.
Money accrues you power in a leftist government.
The data is not so much manipulated by the IPCC as it is cherry picked. They ignore or delete the data that doesn’t fit what they want, and keep what they do. They were caught red-handed doing it years ago and they haven’t stopped. It’s about as bad a science as you can get.
It’s good to see that Lindzen is still active.
Climate Science = Political Science.
It takes only one reproducible, high quality experiment that fails to match a theory’s predictions to render it disproved and quickly forgotten.
Climate scientists have made numerous predictions. There is not one failed prediction but many. In fact, I cannot find a single prediction that has come true. Therefore, science demands the man caused CO2 causing global warming theory to be disproven and discredited.
Failed predictions that I can quickly name: 2012 prediction that by 2014 there would be no arctic summer ice cap - FALSE.
Hurricanes will increase in number and intensity - FALSE.
Droughts will increase in number and severity - FALSE.
Tornadoes will increase in number and severity - FALSE.
Sea level rising - FALSE.
Greenland ice coverage to disappear - FALSE.
Snow in England will be a very rare event - FALSE.
Each IPCC report makes specific future temperature claims. Each and every one of these predictions is - FALSE.
The theory that man caused CO2 is causing global warming is absolutely discredited by science.
“It’s about as bad a science as you can get...
It’s NOT a Science as it apparently has no predictive powers to within 1% much less an Engineering predictive power of <10%.
Btt
Ping
LIEberals, LIE!
ALWAYS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.