Skip to comments.
Bodycam Shows Florida Police Tasing Woman Accused of Stealing From Publix
Law&Crime Network ^
| July 7, 2022
| Law&Crime Network
Posted on 07/07/2022 12:17:16 PM PDT by Morgana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: eyeamok
21
posted on
07/07/2022 12:55:21 PM PDT
by
taxcontrol
(The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
To: V_TWIN
What was the cop supposed to do, walk away?
NO, his duty was to then solicit an official criminal complaint from the store employee in writing or on recording, for the record. Then you produce the receipt and demand the store employee be arrested for making a False police report.
22
posted on
07/07/2022 1:02:07 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: Morgana
She was going WAY out of her way to be belligerent. The cop kept his cool long past the point where I would have lost it.
I think it very plausible that she was trying to create a circumstance where she could sue the store.
23
posted on
07/07/2022 1:04:52 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
To: eyeamok
I would have made someone in the store make the accusation in front of the cop too. Then I would have shown the receipt to the cop.
To: The Louiswu
No one has to prove their innocence in this country. It was on Publix to show proof of a crime, like video evidence for example, barring that it's their word against the customers. Bingo.
25
posted on
07/07/2022 1:11:36 PM PDT
by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: Doctor Congo
Is their some legal reason to not just show the receipt to the cop? I learned back in High School that it isn't smart to be disrespectful of cops. Even if they might not deserve respect. And in a sense, way back then it was probably “discrimination” against a goofy looking kid with long hair (which is how I took it).
26
posted on
07/07/2022 1:14:21 PM PDT
by
21twelve
(Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
To: packagingguy
That’s strange, why DIDN’T she show the receipt to the officer and prove to the store they were wrong?Because she was counting on Barney Fife to go medieval on her heinie so she could sue taxpayers and screw them out of a nice fat payday...?
27
posted on
07/07/2022 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: FreedomPoster
It could have been because she was innocent. I understand that is a foreign concept to you. As you go about your business today, be careful that you are not knocked out by your halo hitting you on the head.
28
posted on
07/07/2022 1:15:10 PM PDT
by
sport
To: Morgana
Her approach achieved exactly what she wanted. That’s sick.
29
posted on
07/07/2022 1:16:00 PM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
(Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
To: Morgana
There’d be fewer thefts if more people were treated like that.
30
posted on
07/07/2022 1:16:22 PM PDT
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
To: qwerty1234
Blacks have been told repeatedly by white liberals they do not need to follow rules or listen to cops - and this is why they get shot. I know. I'm a little bit surprised she didn't just put the car in gear and drive off and temp getting shot in order to be the hero.
31
posted on
07/07/2022 1:32:18 PM PDT
by
libertylover
(Democrats are as determined to kill innocent people as the Nazis.)
To: The Louiswu
Meanwhile, she leaves. Good plan.
32
posted on
07/07/2022 1:34:30 PM PDT
by
mfish13
(Elections have Consequences.)
To: Morgana
To: ConservativeInPA
Her approach achieved exactly what she wanted. Well, not quite. Her "I won the lottery" lawsuit was dismissed (with prejudice).
34
posted on
07/07/2022 1:37:56 PM PDT
by
libertylover
(Democrats are as determined to kill innocent people as the Nazis.)
To: eyeamok
The officer had and has a DUTY to Articulate a Reasonable Suspicion a crime was committed
That basis was clearly there.
35
posted on
07/07/2022 1:48:02 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Morgana
She is under no obligation to “show her papers”. If Publix was willing to swear out a complaint, it is on them. If the cop overreacted then it is on them.
Everything she had was her property and she is entitled “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
This sounds like someone screwed up and needs to be held accountable.
36
posted on
07/07/2022 1:52:13 PM PDT
by
gunnut
To: lepton
The officer acted on gossip by a store employee, Not an official sworn criminal complaint by the store employee. Gossip can never be a reasonable suspicion.
37
posted on
07/07/2022 1:52:22 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: qwerty1234
Sorry but not a rule. It was her stuff and her receipt. Publix or the cop should have been held accountable.
38
posted on
07/07/2022 1:53:03 PM PDT
by
gunnut
To: V_TWIN
But they took Publix word for it and they were wrong/lied.
39
posted on
07/07/2022 1:55:00 PM PDT
by
gunnut
To: Morgana
Apparently Publix did not see her steal anything. They asked her to show a receipt as she left the store and she refused. Can’t accuse someone of shoplifting if you did not witness a crime.
40
posted on
07/07/2022 2:01:06 PM PDT
by
gunnut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson