Posted on 06/16/2022 12:06:16 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
A renowned virologist and vaccine creator has issued a warning that the experimental gene-based COVID-19 vaccine campaigns will cause an emergence of a new highly virulent and infectious COVID-19 variant within “the next two months” which will serve to “crash” the health care system.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, whose résumé includes roles as a former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world.
In a May 18 interview with Australian journalist Maria Zeee, Vanden Bossche said, “that in the next two months, I expect an explosion [of this virulent variant] in one of these highly vaccinated countries. And then it will go very, very fast.”
According to his theory, the resulting suppression of innate immunity in the many individuals who have been injected with these experimental products—which neither eradicate nor prevent transmission of the virus—will lead to “immune escape.”
This concept proposes that vaccinated people will continue to be infected with and shed the virus, which due to the “pressure” exerted by experimental COVID-19 vaccines, will accumulate large numbers of mutations, in turn creating variants which are far more virulent and can no longer be controlled by the vaccines…
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
“Just read up on Justin Bieber as an example.”
Hmm, I hadn’t heard about him, but looking it up, it seems his condition is caused by reactivation of dormant chicken pox virus (which we pretty much all have floating around in our bodies).
But this is something that shouldn’t happen to a person for many decades after they contract chicken pox (if they contracted it as a child). Sounds very much like his immune system has been compromised.
Well, coronaviruses have been studied a lot so they mutate at a fairly predictable rate. And we certainly can pinpoint when the vaccines started being heavily administered. So if you are hypothesizing that, subsequent to the vaccination program, it will take only a certain number of mutations before the virus evades immunity, then it doesn’t seem that making a ballpark estimate would be too difficult.
“He’s lazy and unwilling to submit this specific research...”
I don’t think he’s claiming to have done new research, he is just giving his professional opinion, based on the known facts, and based on already well-established known phenomenon.
I’m dumbfounded at your pseudointellectual attempt to rationalize the most bizarrely confident assertion. They do not mutate at a constant rate. Watching for a mutation is like watching for the nuclear shedding of a neutrino: There are rules for governing the chance a mutation will occur over a certain amount of time, but an actual event is purely random. So to look back over 2 years and predict that whatever strain proliferates next, let alone within two months, is likely to be deadly is just smash-your-skull-with-a-brick insane, unless he knows something he isn’t saying.
No this “something” doesn’t necessarily need to be a new lab release, but he will understandably fuel paranoia not acution if he’s correct.
Hope he is wrong. But if he is right, I hope the jab pushers are held accountable...but they probably won’t be, they will just blame it on the unbelievers who did not buy their snake oil.
“They do not mutate at a constant rate.”
I didn’t say “constant rate”, I said “fairly predictable rate”.
“an actual event is purely random”
Yes, but we’re not talking about one event, we are talking about the generalized, average rate of mutation, which is something that is known, and for a virus family as studied as coronaviruses, it is fairly well known.
“predict that whatever strain proliferates next”
He’s not predicting any particular strain that will proliferate. He’s simply speculating that over a known period of time, in a virus with a fairly well known rate of mutatation, there’s a good chance that ONE of the variants that arises by that time will escape immunity, and I think his prediction is based not on the nature of any particular variant, but based on his belief that the vaccines have done damage to people’s natural immunity. If natural immunity is damaged, and the vaccine-provided immunity is insufficient, then it doesn’t necessarily take a deadlier or more virulent virus to escape immunity. After a certain point, if the body’s natural ability to respond to a new variant is crippled, then ANY new variant that is sufficiently different from what the vaccine might protect against could be very deadly to those with compromised immune systems.
Okay. It still does not detract from the point that he is unwilling to submit his “opinion” his “hypothesis” for peer review.
>> Yes, but we’re not talking about one event, we are talking about the generalized, average rate of mutation, which is something that is known, and for a virus family as studied as coronaviruses, it is fairly well known. <<
Actually, no. We don’t care one whit whether a given mutation occurs, but rather whether the mutation that DOES occur leads to something more lethal and THAT’S a singular event.
>> He’s not predicting any particular strain that will proliferate. He’s simply speculating that over a known period of time, in a virus with a fairly well known rate of mutatation, there’s a good chance that ONE of the variants that arises by that time will escape immunity,<<
“Leaky vaccines” are clearly a problem. It’s the notion that he can time when the vaccines will create something killer which is outrageous.
>> and I think his prediction is based not on the nature of any particular variant, but based on his belief that the vaccines have done damage to people’s natural immunity. <<
Now, I see where you’re coming from. You think this is some good guy explaining why the vaccines are bad.
“You think this is some good guy explaining why the vaccines are bad.”
He’s been consistent in his message throughout pretty much the whole pandemic. And it hasn’t been that “vaccines are bad” strictly, but that starting a mass vaccination program during the middle of a pandemic is very risky and can lead to more casualties than the natural course of the pandemic would.
They misspelled “Geert V. Phrobe”.
Evidently, So did I ...
2 months he says?
Now how about that? Just in time to allow the Democrats to steal another election.
Here come the vaxxers
If this prediction is anything like the global warming predictions , we’re good.
You mean like the kind of peer review done by entities like The Lancet?
What a joke.Nothing but the good old boys club high fiving each other for parroting the party line.
The Lancet has done nothing but prove what a farce “peer review” really is.
I would not be surprised.
That’s ONE journal. He has plenty of others to select.
And there’s such a thing as discernment.
Hilarious because it’s so obvious.
Mid-terms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.