[E. Pluribus Unum]

Then pre-born babies can be classified as human life, right?

[Hieronymus]

Does this give the Babylonia Bee the same status as the National Catholic Reporter, which is known in some circles as “Fishwrap”?

[skeeter]

Why the hell not.

[SJackson]

Outdoors/Rural/wildlife/hunting/hiking/backpacking/National Parks/animals list please FR mail me to be on or off . And ping me is you see articles of interest.

[moovova]

On a scale of 1-to-10, where does that put the Unicorn?

[coloradan]

Well, they have no idea what a woman is, so, this makes perfect sense.

[nuke_road_warrior]

More importantly, can worker bees, now identify as drones?

[bert]

Actually, this misrepresents the matter.

The law in addition to fish and other vertebrates, includes invertebrates.

Bees, Apis melifora, are invertebrates and thus subject to the law.

This article is the result of journalistic and thus subsequent reader ignorance

[I want the USA back]

So bees are fish and boys are girls and girls are boys. Is there some kind of a national compulsion to always adopt the insane position in any debate?

Why do those who maintain their truthful connection to reality get trashed by those whose demented perceptions deny them access to reality?

[jdsteel]

Do the bees identify as fish?

Do they do that individually or collectively, as in a hive?

And what is a woman bee/fish?

[marron]

“The law is whatever we say it is.”

[Carriage Hill]

I’d be lying if I said I even understood this idiotic crap.

[Rio]

I want my bees to be ponies.

[DoodleDawg]

A badly written bill containing a loophole that they waltzed right through. Can’t blame them for taking advantage of it.

[COBOL2Java]

But can male bees identify as female?

[gundog]

In a time of transgenderism, this makes as much sense as anything else. Sit the kids down for a talk about the birds and the bees. Or fish. Whatever.

[Paleo Conservative]

What do you expect from California courts that can’t even figure out what is a man or a woman?

[euram]

so, they’re transbees now.

[DannyTN]

Steve Lehto on youtube Lehto’s law had an interesting explanation of this.

Apparently the law included invertebrates under the Fish group.

The lower court ruled that must have meant “marine invertebrates”. But the appeals court overruled.

Lehto said that when legislation is meant to be protective like this, the courts will take a very liberal interpretation. Liberal in the sense of expansive.

Explained some reasons why you don’t want to revisit legislation like this to fix it.

[Stosh]

Yeah, fine, bees are fish, no problem there - but what I need to know is what pronouns am I supposed to use when I’m talking about them?