Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NohSpinZone

So much for serve and protect.

L


2 posted on 06/06/2022 3:53:02 PM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Serving and protecting is one thing. But ain’t no way no cop is going to get his uniform all wet.


6 posted on 06/06/2022 3:57:22 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I love my country. It's my government that I hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
Unless you have specifically undergone lifesaving training and are a strong swimmer, jumping in deep water to save somebody else is dangerous as hell. A person struggling in the water can clutch and grab onto a perspective rescuer, potentially drowning them both.

Without knowing how good swimmers these cops were, I cannot fault them for not going into the water after him.

9 posted on 06/06/2022 3:59:10 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Castle Rock vs Gonzales
LEOs have no Duty to Protect.


21 posted on 06/06/2022 4:06:17 PM PDT by griswold3 (When chaos serves the State, the State will encourage chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Judgment call.

I can’t fault the officers.


23 posted on 06/06/2022 4:06:47 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
"To Serve and Protect" is a marketing slogan, like "New and Improved" or "Family Size!"

Legally meaningless, wildly outdated.

A better, and more honest one would be "To Oppress and Go Home."

Remember, these are the guys who will be confiscating your guns. They will be the face at your front door, and the ones who will shoot your dog. "Only following Orders."

They might say, "Sorry!" After.

25 posted on 06/06/2022 4:07:42 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

I agree with the sentiment that the “protect and serve” role of police officers has become an antiquated notion, but jumping in and trying to save someone who is drowning will likely get you killed unless you are well-trained for the situation.

The headline and overall tone of the article was written as a hit piece against the officer.


32 posted on 06/06/2022 4:11:53 PM PDT by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

They told the guy to NOT go in......he did it anyway.

As far as I’m concerned that qualifies as attempting to both serve AND protect.....he refused to listen....that’s on him.

I’ve had a rule of thumb for a long time, it goes something like this:

If I tell someone their hair is on fire and the give me the middle finger.....I say let it burn.


35 posted on 06/06/2022 4:17:22 PM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

I wouldn’t have gone in either....and I was a Lake Michigan life guard.


43 posted on 06/06/2022 4:23:20 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

They serve smart people not people dumb enough to get themselves in a jam. Because everyone is so smart, especially them, and smart people never behave recklessly, especially not them.

Save Yourself, Dummy.

Our cops :)


55 posted on 06/06/2022 4:48:56 PM PDT by Born in 1950 (Anti left, nothing else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

What kind of drugs were in this guys system. Fool.


67 posted on 06/06/2022 5:25:30 PM PDT by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker; Reno89519; Responsibility2nd; TheDandyMan; Blurb2350; V_TWIN; AnthonySoprano; griswold3

“So much for serve and protect.”

Ridiculous, no, downright idiotic.

An LEO equipment belt is equivalent to a divers weight belt. and in no case should any said officer need to subject him/herself to extreme lethal danger in order “serve and protect” someone who decides to drown himself.


68 posted on 06/06/2022 5:33:34 PM PDT by A strike ("My country sux" is grounds for asylum?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
So much for serve and protect.

Their new motto


127 posted on 06/07/2022 4:04:56 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fauci is a despicable little turd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

SCOTUS has ruled that the police have NO obligations to protect the citizen. It would appear that they have no obligations to save a citizen.

Just saying


133 posted on 06/07/2022 11:24:50 AM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson