Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Rethink Trump's SCOTUS Appointments

Posted on 05/03/2022 10:00:38 AM PDT by Tell It Right

If the leaked SCOTUS opinion is authentic (Roberts says it is for what that's worth), then those of us, myself included, who have criticized Trump's SCOTUS appointments ought to attaboy them for trying to get rid of the horrible Roe non-law.

The ones in favor (according to reports) are: Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett. Of course, the last 3 on that list were put there by Trump.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; chat; ketanjibrownjackson; paulryan; plannedparenthood; righttolife; roe; roevswade; scotus; vanity; wade; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Tell It Right

So why “rethink”” the Trump appointments???


21 posted on 05/03/2022 10:18:22 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonspirit

That’s Sununu’s fault. He was pushing very hard for him—against the other names being bandied about.

(One good insight from the Bill Barr book.)


22 posted on 05/03/2022 10:18:42 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Agreed.


23 posted on 05/03/2022 10:20:55 AM PDT by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy; All
The leak is intended to make one or more of them fold. It seems more and more likely that will happen.

Who do you think that's most likely to be? Kavanaugh?
24 posted on 05/03/2022 10:22:10 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
We've criticized the Trump appointments, and honestly have had reason to. We've done it to the point of asking questions like: "Why did Trump appoint Gorsuch if he's gonna side with the left half the time?" or "I wish Trump had appointed someone else besides Kavanaugh".

But if this does strike down Roe like many of us have wanted for decades, then they've earned our respect.

25 posted on 05/03/2022 10:22:13 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"No, it’s time to wait until the actual ruling comes down. Instead of prematurely celebrating over a well-written draft."

Amen. A draft opinion is a draft opinion. Nothing has been decided, and it won't be finalized, until the official decision is released by the court. There's no guarantees here.

26 posted on 05/03/2022 10:30:06 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

If this does happen then it will be Trump’s greatest accom.


27 posted on 05/03/2022 10:30:43 AM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jimmygrace
but I also recall that this society supported John Roberts, so nothing is 100%.

Roberts had few red flags at the time. In fact, Anthony Kennedy looked like a slam dunk when he was confirmed. Blackmail? Extortion? Seeking human respect? Some or all of the above? Who knows?
28 posted on 05/03/2022 10:31:56 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (“...we would live very well without Facebook."-B.LeMaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Well I think it is not time to “rethink” Trump’s judicial appointments, that to me is premature, and instead I think we should hold our fire, for now.

One of the worst scenarios would be the case of Gorsuch and/or Kavanaugh feeling under pressure due to the hoopla over the leak of Alito’s opinion, and change their otherwise expected vote.


29 posted on 05/03/2022 10:31:57 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right; All
"Time to Rethink Trump's SCOTUS Appointments"

Long overdue to rethink 17th Amendment, both the 16th and 17th Amendments.

30 posted on 05/03/2022 10:32:32 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Not really time to rethink them. They got one thing right. But they stabbed us in the back on stolen elections, and the Covid dictatorship.


31 posted on 05/03/2022 10:41:12 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonspirit

“Crazy that a Republican would put Souter on the court. Did that guy even rule for us one time on anything controversial?”

Not so crazy when you consider that a RINO, by definition, is not a Republican.


32 posted on 05/03/2022 10:44:41 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Not going to give kudos to these 3 backstabbing jerks. When they threw out the Texas lawsuit and refused to hear any of the election challenges or look at any evidence they became worthless to me.


33 posted on 05/03/2022 10:59:08 AM PDT by lone star annie ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

If his appointments were worth a bowl of warm spit, Trump would still be president because of the constitutional violations that took place in the election.

With the insane road that this country (and world) is currently on I’d say there’s at least a decent chance that this is all being orchestrated to further other insanity that the left has planned.


34 posted on 05/03/2022 11:08:36 AM PDT by bramps (Dr. Oz is a sick man. What the hell are you thinking Trump?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right
My money's on the non-biologist. She's the new factor.

Associate Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson, while succeeding Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, is not involved in this case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization [Mississippi]. No Justice, not present for the oral arguments (December 2021), can vote on a case. Thus comes those decisions with less than 9 Justices [modern era] voting/participating, generally when a Justice has died (Ginzburg & Scalia).

That being said, it is possible she (and staff) had access to this draft. However, being the newcomers, the question is are they so political as to kill their USSC relations so quickly?

35 posted on 05/03/2022 11:10:28 AM PDT by SES1066 (More & more it looks like Brandon's best decision was Kamala! UGH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GaryCrow

“If this does happen then it will be Trump’s greatest accom.”

His other would be flushing all the cockroaches out into the open. Decades of various groups pretending to be for America and the American people exposed as frauds.


36 posted on 05/03/2022 11:10:39 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“ lets make sure they still vote the way they originally intended”

Oh, OK.

You have them on speed dial?


37 posted on 05/03/2022 11:12:33 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Love's redeeming work is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

If they reverse this decision then Roberts shows the SCOTUS for the partisan embarrassment it has become under his watch and the rule of law is whatever the progressives want it to be. The FBI/DOJ up to this point have done massive damage to the legal system top to bottom with their third world behavior, this will end any pretense that we are a country where the rule of law means anything. This will be the end of the jury box. We are about left with only the ammo box sadly...


38 posted on 05/03/2022 11:13:10 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Nope of course not..but the leak was intended on intimidating one of them to change their vote


39 posted on 05/03/2022 11:15:50 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Wait until it’s issued, much can change between now and then.
The leak could be successful at changing the outcome.


40 posted on 05/03/2022 11:35:29 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson