Skip to comments.Panic in Trudeau’s Canada as Triple Vaccinated have a higher Covid Death-Rate than the Unvaccinated
Posted on 04/23/2022 3:02:01 PM PDT by ransomnote
No one can hope to read all the Covid-19 publishing that is going on around the world. But some information came my way about Canadian Covid-19 statistics available here.
By Guy Hatchard
Proponents of vaccination will be deeply gratified to note that at first glance the unvaccinated appear to be taking a beating. Graphs show the unvaccinated outnumber the vaccinated, for cases, hospitalisation, and death. But reading a little further you are informed that the graphs above cover all cases recorded since December 2020—the total cases since 2020.
In December 2020 virtually no one was vaccinated, so at the start of this data set most would have been unvaccinated. This fact did not escape the notice of an alternative but very statistically diligent UK publication ‘The Expose’ which set about mining the available official data to uncover the current Covid-19 statistics. You can read their analysis and view their graphs here.
In summary, for the period 21st February to 13th March 2022 The Expose found that the triple vaccinated are currently the most likely to catch Covid, be hospitalized, and die (see above).
If you look at data from around the world, you find that in many highly vaccinated populations the proportion of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths are rising in a similar manner to affect the vaccinated. There are two possible explanations for this being discussed::
- The virus has mutated to prefer to infect the vaccinated.
- The immune system of the vaccinated is being compromised by repeated injections.
Both are probably happening.
The most disturbing feature of this trend is that you cannot have a rational debate about it with those who are taking decisions about pandemic policy. Any discussion of this nature is off limits. A couple of days ago I had a long conversation with a prominent pro-vaxxer in the USA, a microbiologist. It was precisely around the point above that our conversation stalled. Whilst the data is very clear, even to a layman; to a pro-vaxxer it must be flawed, although they cannot say how. I am very open to the possibility of a public moderated scientific debate, but I am coming to the sad conclusion that this will not be offered. Without informed debate, we cannot claim to live in a civil society.
What is really happening in Canada behind the scenes
So unfortunately I am left with satire, the last resort of those who are excluded and can only dance outside the fire circle. I can only imagine Prime Minister Trudeau’s conversations with his mentor Klaus Schwab, leader of the World Economic Forum (both Trudeau and Ardern attended his training for Young Leaders). The conversation might go as follows:
Trudeau: Do you have a minute, something urgent has come up? You promised me that the pandemic would reduce the world’s population to ease famine, overcrowding, and the climate crisis. It is working, but the wrong people are being eradicated. My closest followers, the vaccinated masses, are dwindling.
Schwab: We are working hard to develop new variants in our bioweapon labs to rectify the situation……
This is of course pure fantasy and a stupid conspiracy theory circulating on the black web. A slur on the integrity of both men. The real conversation, recorded by Russian hackers went as follows:
Trudeau: You promised me that the AI cloned Epidemiologists, Virologists, and Public Health experts you sourced from the giant planet Fizzer circulating the super massive star Betelgeuse in the constellation Orion would work properly. They have gone rogue. I want them sent back to Fizzer and restored to their factory settings of rationality. They should also be reprogrammed to enable communication with humans.
Schwab: I will contact NASA right away, Betelgeuse is 642.5 light years away. Let me see, today is April 1st, it might take a while……
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
What’s going on:
1) 96 year-old people with terminal lung cancer are counted as COVID deaths if they had a positive test within 90 days of their death from cancer.
2) Said 96-year old is far more likely to be tripple-vaxxed than a healthy 16 year old.
3) People look at the 96-year old who was triple-vaxxed, died of cancer, and was counted as a COVID death. They then look at the healthy unvaxxed 16-year old. They conclude the vaccine makes it more likely for people to die of COVID.
4) For some reason this type of article gets constantly reposted.
Sounds like time to confiscate some more big rigs.
You cherry picked an anecdote and wish me to assume the entire nation conforms to your ‘happy’ interpretation, even as children die of strokes and heart attacks, athletes drop dead on the green, pilots are grounded, unprecedented levels of peri/myocarditis bloom nationwide, shocking levels of paralysis, death within 2 or 3 days of ‘vaccination’, and you want to just funnel it all through your happy ‘narrative’ instead.
For some reason people like you pretend that Pfizer’s data showed risks that are now born out in human suffering and death.
Wow, so all of them that are the triple vaxxed this article speaks of are 96 years old and have cancer. Who woulda thunk it?
What’s that 1 and a half deaths per 100k ? Not very many
Our oldest son and wife got vax. Our other son, daughter, son in law, 4 grandkids did not get vax. We didn’t get vax.
The ones who got the vax did get covid. The rest of us did not.
Look, it’s a valid point. The populations that got to triple vaccinations fastest were the populations we worried about the most, e.g. elderly. My 92 y.o. mother got to triple vaccination status a few days after the earliest possible moment. Florida did a great job of getting the elderly and other highly at risk populations vaccinations first. These are precisely the people who have co-morbidities as a function of age or disease.
When some guy posts information that purports to be
“Pfizer Data” and it has no more indicia of validity than the poster’s claim it is “Pfizer Data”, I’m not biting.
The survival rate has remained the same throughout the entire pandemic.
It’s not a valid point; it was a logical fallacy, Sweeping Generation. Fauci and others though are dead set on stopping all of the information that exposes their lies, and it’s a steady drip, drip.
You can prove this is happened and is common enough to account for the stats, or is it just a hypothetical?
Regardless of one’s interpretation of these statistics, and to be sure there is a LOT of information that is missing to make a serious study, NO ONE has been “vaccinated”. People have gotten none, 1 or 2 or 3 shots of an inadequately tested experimental mRNA drug. Criminally inadequately.
The problem with a graph like this is it just ain’t that simple, too many variables are not accounted for. What this graph says is that there should be some serious money allocated for some heavy duty genuine scientific study on this. NOT the BS that Pfizer claims is testing. That is not going to happen because the mRNA pushers do not want to confront the possibility that the drug is not only not effective, but may well be a health negative.
Statistical analysis of things like this are not accomplished by a simplistic bar graph like this, which is further complicated by a pack of lying politicians with an agenda who will not allow proper research. Or even proper compilation of raw data.
Yup...what else would you expect?
Good for you.
Eh, as I recall that was claimed with the UK numbers, but then they teased out the data by age group and the phenomenon still held.
Good analysis. Anecdotal: the 65+ crowd I know has already or plans to get triple vaxxed. The younger folks I know are not planning to get triple vaxxed.
However the data certainly brings the effectiveness of the jabs into very serious doubt...it just does not quite prove that they have no effectiveness or even negative effectiveness. For myself I would love to see more data to verify or dispel such doubts. But is Pfizer running to the rescue with their clinical trial data? Nope. They are fighting to keep it sealed for as many decades as they can.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.