Posted on 03/25/2022 3:40:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
The time for polite consideration is over; good sense, courage, and strength demand a Nay vote on her appointment.
For crying out loud, it’s 2022 and, in the federal government women are still being promoted based on their looks rather than their qualifications for the job. And by POTUS no less! Well, Biden is just a derivative iteration of Harvey Weinstein.
Around twenty years ago, he twice participated in filibustering (Black, female) Judge Janice Rogers Brown’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals. She finally was approved in 2005. Then, Biden advised President Bush that if he dared to nominate Brown to the Supreme Court, he would filibuster her again and prevail. At the same time, Democrats also filibustered a Hispanic male judge, two other female judges, and a male judge of Lebanese descent, among others. How very diverse, inclusive, and equitatious of them.
However, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson does have several attributes in common with the President. For one, she’s got a lousy memory. Indeed, it was Senator Cruz’s careful and repetitious questioning, that helped her to recall quite a few things about herself that she had previously forgotten. Such a lack of self-awareness from one who anticipates setting precedent is disturbing.
She did independently recall “staring at the image on the cover [of Derrick Bell’s book Faces At The Bottom Of The Well] when I was growing up.” She must have been a very late bloomer. That book was first published when she was a senior at Harvard.
Judge Brown is no scholar. She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott case. How does she expect to converse intelligently with thoroughly prepared lawyers regarding precedent and relevance in cases that will appear before her in the Supreme
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
These leftists hate the Constitution and want to tear it down. How can any fool expect them to abide by an oath to rule accurately on constitutional issues? The left is trying to TEAR IT DOWN.
To the left it’s okay to attack Kavanaugh personally but to ask questions of Brown about her record is now somehow a personal attack and not okay.
Which makes her a liar.
In fact, being from the left makes her a liar.
Can you imagine if she were treated the same way as Kavanaugh?
She couldn’t speak to Dred Scott, arguably one of the most contentious cases on race relations in American history and one that is taught in the first year of law school across the country. That lack of judicial awareness alone should be a disqualifier. Any conservative judge would be mercilessly attacked for their lack of knowledge about it let alone any of a number of other judicial subjects to which this poseur couldn’t speak.
Converse? As if. They will be appearing before her. They speak. She listens and questions them. They respond. There is no converse.
No way she is a Trojan Horse. Everything about her is an open book! She is a judicial activist dressed in a costume of a black robed judge.
And I hate to break it to folks but as long as Deep State controls the SCOTUS, it doesn’t matter who sits on the highest court in the land. The SCOTUS will rule the way Deep State tells it to rule.
The problem will come when we restore the republic and have nine compromised judges sitting on the SC.
I don’t think Katanja has any idea about the typical American Family...she is too busy thinking about the BLACK FAMILY, THE BLACK EXPERIENCE, THE BLACK PERSPECTIVE ON LIFE.
If all I thought about was the WHITE experience, it would be just as biased.
BTTT
I’ve been told she will not be any worse than Justice Breyer. I’m not so sure that is the case.
Nothing stealthy about this clown.
She’s not a Trojan horse.
She’s a barbarian that was inside the horse.
How could she be a Trojan horse when she doesn’t know what a woman is? She could identify as one possibly!
She’s female and black. She checks every block on the list.
So if it is ever settled at the SCOTUS that the 2020 presidential was a fraud and needs to be undone, will permanent lifetime appointments be withdrawn and reappointed? If not, it seems to me that would be like allowing a bank robber’s family to keep the cash that was stolen in the heist!
So you think it is not possible to express and exchange ideas by way of questions? Are you sure you know the definition of the word? How many questions would you are needed to show the post to be inaccurate?
How did her cop/soldier brother with almost the same name as her, amass a net worth of $4-6M, on an 80k year salary?
https://ghanafuo.com/ketajh-brown-bio/
Judge Brown is no scholar. She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott case.
Wow. I guess “brilliant “ means something else when applied to black people…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.