Posted on 03/23/2022 10:22:20 AM PDT by NetAddicted
A bag of rocks who can’t even explain what a woman is might even raise the level of intelligence in that dump.
Yep, while it’s still legal to admit.
“Women have the right to financial independence and equal benefits.” Either they do or they do not. The first word of this sentence is in dispute and it negates the remainder. There is no physical advantage for a woman to switch to male and compete. There is significant advantage to transfer from male to female. Is this disparity legally protected?
Embedded in her answer lies a new kind of evil man that can oppress at will and without a call to responsibility. She should not be judge base on that answer alone.
That whole exchange is proof that she’s too incompetent - not to mention too cowardly! - to be on the Court. She’s just another political hack.
Collins, Graham, and Murkowski confirmed her to the DC Circuit, June 14, 2021.
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2021/06/14/senate-section/article/S4511-3
She does not have the commanding level of legal scholarship that one expects of a Supreme Court Justice. RBG's was of a level that Scalia respected her for it. Indeed most of the present court shows a reasonable degrees of such scholarship.
This candididate is without a judicial philosophy at all, and Dhillon is correct to imply she is a nihilist. Her approach to law is entirely transactional.
Miss Jackson, are you a woman?
How do you know?
She also “couldn’t say “ when she thought life begins. In fact, she even did an annoying little Kamala giggle when saying that.
My wife asked me to water the plants today but I refused. Said I can’t define “plant” since I’m not a botanist.
Thanks....wish their constituents could knock some sense into their RINO heads.
McRomney’s too.
I wonder who Midge will give the free voting passes to, this time.
You know they will approve her in the end. The most important qualification is that she is a black woman. The purpose of the court has been set aside.
Ans also,ask,that she answer whether she is a woman or not, and if so, demand that she answer what makes her a woman.
*********************
Post of the day.
Or abortion?🤔
It really doesn’t matter if they already have RINO votes. RINOs are loyal to their coffers and nothing else!
That’s where Blackburn fell down.
This FEMALE was nominated precisely because Biden declared that he would nominate a Black Woman.
That seems to indicate that Brown-Jackson is a Woman.
When she couldn’t define ‘woman’, she should have been asked if she IS one.
Jeez. If she doesn’t even know what she is, how can she know what anything or anyone else is?
Not dumb...cowardly.
She knows the answer and her non-answer also indicates she knows there is a political answer as well.
That is the problem.....a potential Justice should be able to assure the panel of their ability to define legal terms in the face of political conflict
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.