Posted on 03/23/2022 10:22:20 AM PDT by NetAddicted
Beyond the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson was obviously trying to keep from making the ‘woke’ masses angry by defining a woman, the fact she would go in that direction while being ‘interviewed’ by the Senate tells us she doesn’t really care about the law, she cares about the politics.
And as Harmeet K. Dhillon points out, this is not just embarrassingly biased but could have some actual legal ramifications.
Take a gander:
How do you adjudicate Title VII claims without being able to to answer this question? Title IX? https://t.co/VicNi0Yrjj
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Right? If you can’t define what a woman is how can you possibly make judgments based on, around, or even for women? What a huge misstep for KBJ, and what a sad world we live in that she felt this was the only way out when asked a question that could be politically damaging. We get it, if she had said, ‘a woman is an adult female’, the 10% of the country who thinks that’s somehow bigoted would have thrown a fit. Sadly, they are the loudest in the room …
But she’d be a SCOTUS justice for LIFE.
Why not answer the question?
I mean, as we now know, biology has nothing to do with being a "woman," so even from a Marxist/nihilist perspective, this is the wrong answer.
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Scary that we have to look at anything from a Marxist perspective.
3/ Sadly, Republican senators are more afraid of being called names by elderly white bigots (Sheldon Whiteclub, anyone?) than of putting someone on the high court who mocks them with such answers, ignores the law as written, falsely denies CRT influencing her judging… smh.
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Awww yes, Sheldon Whitehouse, the old white guy who belongs to more than one all-white club.
4/Judge Jackson is obviously academically qualified to be on the court, but that's a box-checking exercise. Today's answers demonstrate a calculating willingness to say whatever she thinks will get her votes or keep her from losing votes. Who is this person really? She won't say.
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Who is this person really?
She won’t say.
And that’s terrifying.
Judge Jackson sat in judgment of thousands of people in court. In each of these cases, judges are required to make credibility determinations. If a witness answered a question in this flippant/fake way, they’d be risking an admonition or even warning of contempt of court/ https://t.co/rLvYpmLIkX
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Oh you can bet your sweet arse if a witness had answered a question like she did as a judge she would not have approved.
2/Defense counsel: “Security guard, at the time did you say it was a man, or a woman, driving the getaway car?” Witness: “I’m not a biologist. 🤷🏽♀️” Would that answer fly in District Judge Jackson’s courtroom? It would not. And the witness would have no credibility. Case closed.
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) March 23, 2022
Case closed indeed.
*** US NEWS Another poll on Biden approval shows Dems still on track for a midterm election disaster.
what
I heard she’ll probably get confirmed even if no R’s vote for her. All she needs is a simple majority vote now due to a 2017 rule change.
Won’t stop the Assistant Democrats from voting to confirm.
And apparently there isn’t much Assistant Democrats can do that will stop people from re-electing them.
Amnesty is a death sentence for the rule of law and this country and yet Flimsey Grahamnesty and Micro Rubio still have lots of people voting for them.
Trump endorsing them is antithetical to MAGA.
This has bad ramifications for Y chromosomes!
Linda Grahamnesty went after her, on her radical p0rn background, today, too.
Now....if Midge will only give the Rs permission to vote AGAINST this far left, sicko, radical.
Hopefully, there is NOW enough push back. We’ll see.
Simple answer is any human being with XX pair chromosomes is a woman and those with XY chromosome pairs is a male. Intent or desire to work around that reality is a mental state of gender psychosis. If that’s one’s adult choice, have at it. I want my Zebra to have polka-dots.
Yep, refusal to answer makes her look as dumb as she is.
"So, you will recuse yourself from any cases involving biology?"
"You will recuse yourself from any cases involving "gender equity" or "when does life begin?" because you're not a biologist?"
If she had just said, when asked to define a woman “Lindsay graham” she might be a shoe in lol
Any senator who votes for Jackson to become a SCOTUS justice has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. The Constitution has a word for that.
Its a logical consequence of decades of neo-marxist ideologues and central-planners in Washington DC attempting to redefine and re-write individual rights expressed in the Constitution, in as collective, political, group-based rights.
Ans also,ask,that she answer whether she is a woman or not, and if so, demand that she answer what makes her a woman.
I would have followed up with, If you were to take vitamins, would you take women’s vitamins or men’s vitamins and how would you know?
The Constitution has three words that say Obama could not be President. (or Harris VP)
It’s now a relic in a glass case.
Of course she has opinions on these issues, they will be plainly known after she’s on the court.
2008 wants its debate back. I noticed you didn’t mention songbird McCain who some claim was NBC because he was born in Panamá
She didn’t sound dumb, but Dhillon is correct: she is political. Maybe activist? She’s also a liar, about CRT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.