[NetAddicted]

Sometimes I can copy the tweets that are displayed amongst Twitchy's commentary, but it's easier and clearer to read article at Twitchy.

[devane617]

what

[Antoninus]

There should be universal outrage that an individual attempting to get approved for the Supreme Court refuses to define what a "woman" is.

We are not a serious country anymore.

[gattaca]

I heard she’ll probably get confirmed even if no R’s vote for her. All she needs is a simple majority vote now due to a 2017 rule change.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Won’t stop the Assistant Democrats from voting to confirm.

And apparently there isn’t much Assistant Democrats can do that will stop people from re-electing them.

Amnesty is a death sentence for the rule of law and this country and yet Flimsey Grahamnesty and Micro Rubio still have lots of people voting for them.

Trump endorsing them is antithetical to MAGA.

[immadashell]

… as we now know, biology has nothing to do with being a "woman,"

This has bad ramifications for Y chromosomes!

[Jane Long]

Linda Grahamnesty went after her, on her radical p0rn background, today, too.

Now....if Midge will only give the Rs permission to vote AGAINST this far left, sicko, radical.

Hopefully, there is NOW enough push back. We’ll see.

[blackdog]

Simple answer is any human being with XX pair chromosomes is a woman and those with XY chromosome pairs is a male. Intent or desire to work around that reality is a mental state of gender psychosis. If that’s one’s adult choice, have at it. I want my Zebra to have polka-dots.

[1Old Pro]

Yep, refusal to answer makes her look as dumb as she is.

[G Larry]

When this woke nominee refused to define "woman", saying she's not a biologist, I would have followed with:

"So, you will recuse yourself from any cases involving biology?"

"You will recuse yourself from any cases involving "gender equity" or "when does life begin?" because you're not a biologist?"

[Bob434]

If she had just said, when asked to define a woman “Lindsay graham” she might be a shoe in lol

[Carl Vehse]

Any senator who votes for Jackson to become a SCOTUS justice has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. The Constitution has a word for that.

[1Old Pro]

I would have followed up with, If you were to take vitamins, would you take women’s vitamins or men’s vitamins and how would you know?

[redcatcherb412]

How hard is it to simply state
"A Woman is a human that has two X chromosomes in their cells"?

[bigbob]

Of course she has opinions on these issues, they will be plainly known after she’s on the court.

[Amendment10]

Regarding Judge Jackson's political side-stepping of defining a woman, have any of the post-17th Amendment, election year Republican Senators mentioned that the Supreme Court established precedent (imo) for recognizing male and female sexes when it decided Minor v. Happersett case against Virginia Minor concerning women's suffrage.

Note that Minor's efforts ultimately led to the ratification of the 19th Amendment.

"19th Amendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

[Michael.SF.]

Follow up questions:

Q: Ms. Jackson, President Biden stated that he would nominate a black woman to SCOTUS. If you cannot define what a woman is, how do we know that you fully meet the two established criteria he established for this nomination?

[SMARTY]

“...KBJ’s refusal to define a woman from a LEGAL perspective ...”

The word for this is, ‘compromised’.

No ‘compromised’ person needs to walk into a spot on the SCOTUS.

Judgment (by definition) requires impartiality and objectivity...you can’t undertake that kind of a job if you are already ‘bought and paid for’!

[SERKIT]

I think she actually answered the question:

According to Jackson, the definition of a women comes from biology. Because....SCIENCE!

This also sets aside all chromosome deniers like Bruce Jenner who is TransJennered.

[Jamestown1630]

This person scares the heck out of me.

I am a woman. My DNA is not a ‘social construct’, it’s a fact of Nature proved by science.

How can I trust someone to rule on issues affecting women, if she doesn’t even know what a woman is?

Another poster was correct - when she couldn’t answer, she should have been asked, ‘Are YOU a woman?’

[livius]

She also “couldn’t say “ when she thought life begins. In fact, she even did an annoying little Kamala giggle when saying that.