Posted on 03/15/2022 11:51:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Ever since the COVID-19 vaccines were first made available, open and honest discussion about them, their efficacy, and their potential side effects has been subject to big tech censorship—particularly regarding the mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna.
But maybe now we can finally have open discourse because a new peer-reviewed study from the CDC found significant instances of death and severe side effects from the mRNA vaccines.
While data shows that “most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration,” according to the study, which was published in the UK-based medical journal The Lancet, 6.6% of all side effects were categorized as “serious,” and resulted in “inpatient hospitalisation, prolongation of hospitalisation, permanent disability, life-threatening illness, congenital anomaly or birth defect.”
Deaths represented a stunning 1.3% of side effects reports.
Many, however, argue that data from the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), which the study relied on, isn’t the most reliable.
“From the report of these VAERS data, one can neither conclude that the vaccine is safe or that it is not safe,” epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff, formerly of Harvard Medical School, told Just the News. “From the v-safe survey, we can conclude that mild adverse reactions are very common, and more common than for most vaccines, but we already knew that from the randomized clinical trials. We cannot conclude much about serious adverse events.”
Kulldorff is a co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration, a document authored by experts who advocated for herd immunity to stop the pandemic and “focused protection” for the most vulnerable populations over universal lockdowns.
Last year, CDC kicked Kulldorff off a vaccine safety panel for publicly questioning its recommendation to pause distribution of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine over a statistically insignificant number of reports of severe blood clots.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Regardless of whether you are FOR or AGAINST the Covid vaccines, and regardless of the veracity of the VAERS data, the troubling thing about this report is the way the Biden administration has attempted to FORCE vaccination on the public via mandates, essentially insisting that people don’t have the right to weigh the risks vs. benefits and make a decision on their own whether the vaccine is right for them.
mRNA vaccines are a failure.
You think anyone cares in gummit?
Side effects may include drowsiness, irritability and death. Please consult your doctor before taking mRNA.(screw that)
I wouldn't trust a study from either of them that said water is wet.
For months now we’ve been hearing that nothing of the CDC’s COVID and vaccine results which you disagree with can be believed. Now that the CDC tells us something you agree with? ...the CDC is trustworthy. Pardon my whiplash.
Nuff’ said.
Of course the gummint people care. They finally found a way to balance the Social Security budget and avoid it going bankrupt.
Not so fast do you actually know how many obese losers are on disability SS cause they can’t work!! I worked at Walmart as a cashier for 4 months EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE had EBT cards and SSDI benefits it is disgusting just how many WE ARE supporting!! SO MANY obese people with kids that are obese too!! Such a shame for small children to be so fat and the parents don’t give a damn!!
My problem has always been the FORCED MANDATES.
Take it. Don’t take it. Get 10 boosters.
Just leave me out of it all!
All you Branch Covidians make sure to keep up with them seasonal COVID boosters though......
#pureblood
“See you on the road, skag!!”
and DID FORCE it on the military destroying lives and careers in the process.
Hangings should take place. Many hangings. But before death, I’d like a shot at a few of the condemned. Just five minutes.
The study only admits to about 330,000 “adverse” effects, but Sharyl Attkisson’s breakdown of the VAERS data in October tallied more than 1.5 million. Part of the difference might be explained by the fact that the study only includes data as of June 14th. But extrapolating the study’s claim of 7.9% “serious” side effects (when death is included) to 1.5 million “adverse reaction” reports, gives you 118,000 “serious” effects, far more than the study conceded.
weird
looks like my brother
Your brother lives in post-apocalyptic Australia?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.