Well, at least it isn't slightly pregnant.
1 posted on
02/13/2022 9:24:11 AM PST by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: BenLurkin
...there may already be a 'slightly conscious' AI out in the world.It is called playing chess against the computer.
To: BenLurkin
3 posted on
02/13/2022 9:27:24 AM PST by
Skywise
To: BenLurkin
AI is combination of complex if/then statements combined with pattern-recognition algorithms.
It may be extremely dangerous, but it’s not intelligence.
4 posted on
02/13/2022 9:30:22 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
To: BenLurkin
“Every time such speculative comments get an airing, it takes months of effort to” re-brain wash the masses into thinking that AI is beautiful.
Fixed it.
Only those that truly see the spiritual side of life will get it.
5 posted on
02/13/2022 9:31:36 AM PST by
Revel
To: BenLurkin
Could it be the almost conscience implant in Byedones brain?
6 posted on
02/13/2022 9:31:59 AM PST by
HighSierra5
(The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.p)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
When does Skynet become self aware?
5.56mm
8 posted on
02/13/2022 9:36:14 AM PST by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
To: BenLurkin
AI has been subject to really outrageous hype cycles ever since the invention of the Perceptron by Frank Rosenblatt in 1957. After he "trained" an array of 400 perceptrons connected to 400 selenium photodetectors to distinguish a triangle from a circle he became a celebrity in scientific circles, and the focus of intense controversy.
In the afterglow of the success of his perceptron experiments, he stated that a large enough network of perceptrons would “be able to walk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself, and be conscious of its existence," in his own words at the time.
Perceptrons fell into disfavor in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, and were revived and rebranded as "neural networks" in the 1980s. They are nothing but large networks of digital correlators. They can learn but are not at all good at abstraction.
Belief in the "if you scale it up enough it will become conscious" theory is practically a religion among large segments of the AI community. There is no arguing with those who adhere to this view.
9 posted on
02/13/2022 9:36:39 AM PST by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: BenLurkin
Personally, I really like the movie A.I. (Most folks don’t.) At first glance, the movie spends it’s runtime making you think David is the first mecha to have artificial intelligence. A friend pointed out that the first was really Gigolo Joe, through all of his self-directed actions in the movie that go against his (presumed) programming.
De Ex Machina is another thoughtful movie.
10 posted on
02/13/2022 9:39:55 AM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: BenLurkin
Please define “conscious” in this context.
(My next question will be to ask if your cat or dog is conscious.)
To: BenLurkin
13 posted on
02/13/2022 9:44:46 AM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: BenLurkin
16 posted on
02/13/2022 10:07:06 AM PST by
Bratch
To: BenLurkin
“’I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that...”
That’s odd..Alexa has told me the same thing!😎
19 posted on
02/13/2022 10:08:49 AM PST by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: BenLurkin
20 posted on
02/13/2022 10:12:44 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
To: BenLurkin
What don’t the EXPERTS warn us about?
29 posted on
02/13/2022 11:19:27 AM PST by
Parmy
To: BenLurkin
'Every time such speculative comments get an airing, it takes months of effort to get the conversation back to the more realistic opportunities and threats posed by AI,' according to UNSW Sidney AI researcher Toby Walsh.'Usually, it's only after the people who made the speculative comments die in mysterious and unexplained ways that the conversation finally returns to normal,' Walsh added.
When questioned about the ways in which those people have died, Walsh sweated bullets while referring to "sudden failures of their pacemakers, their oxygen lines being mysteriously severed, and the controls of their hibernators inexplicably going offline."
Walsh, into whom a pacemaker was recently implanted, refused to answer any further questions.
Regards,
30 posted on
02/13/2022 11:27:14 AM PST by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: BenLurkin
Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics sound nice, but how you you incorporate them into AI?
31 posted on
02/13/2022 11:31:56 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: BenLurkin
32 posted on
02/13/2022 11:48:47 AM PST by
sauropod
(Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
To: BenLurkin
To incorporate the three laws, an artificial intelligence would have to understand what a human is and be able to discern between a human and other objects.
34 posted on
02/13/2022 12:06:44 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m not certain intelligence needs to be conscious. The combination is what humans have but it may be short-sighted on our part to act as if they must coincide. Who knows? It may be the worst of all worlds to have an unconscious intelligence running amok in our world. Outside of the DNC that is.
35 posted on
02/13/2022 12:12:18 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson