How to prosecute Fauci and co. for COVID-related crimes

American Thinker ^ | 10 Feb, 2022 | Paul S. Gardiner

[MtnClimber]

The American government is extremely unlikely to do it. But there may be another entity that will.

It is a safe assumption that few Americans know about the December 6, 2021 filing with the International Criminal Court (ICC) accusing 16 high-ranking individuals of genocide and other related crimes against humanity due to their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The ICC filing is on behalf of the people of the United Kingdom (U.K.) who have suffered nearly 160,000 COVID-19 deaths and serious adverse reactions to mandated experimental vaccines.

Among the accused 16 individuals are Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Peter Daszak; Bill and Melinda Gates; Boris Johnson; and the chief executive officers of Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson corporations. Among the seven individuals filing the ICC complaint is Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.

This article suggests that the UK ICC filing can serve as a precursor and precedent for American criminal indictments of several high ranking individuals due to their COVID-19 pandemic related activities. Rather than hope for the federal government to take action of any kind, the indictments could come from grand juries convened by one or more state attorneys general on behalf of the thousands of citizens (and their surviving loved ones) in their respective states who have died and/or suffered due to the COVID-19 virus and/or mandated experimental vaccinations.

Background. The ICC investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by over 120 countries including the United States. The ICC can "step in" when a member-state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member-states are supposed to cooperate with the court.

[Lockbox]

In the United States, the Nuremberg Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki influenced the drafting of regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to ensure ethical treatment of human research subjects, known as the Common Rule, which is now codified in Part 46 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Maybe the Allied Control Council’s Law on Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes Against Peace and Against Humanity, signed By
Joseph T. McNarney
JOSEPH T. MCNARNEY
General, U. S. Army
12/20/1945

This was used for the bases of the Nuremberg Trials, so in fact the US signed on to Nuremberg. President Harry S Truman appointed Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H Jackson to be the chief prosecutor representing the United States in the proposed trials for the European Axis powers. So again the US takes legal action to activate the Nuremberg Trials.

[Honest Nigerian]

I hear you there.
But, I wonder if this will turn out like the Jimmy Saville situation? Once Fauci is truly useless to the Deep State (or maybe after he dies?) .... [well, sometimes fantasies come to pass]

[Honest Nigerian]

Duke the Puke - go away

[DugwayDuke]

Lockbox wrote: “In the United States, the Nuremberg Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki influenced the drafting of regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to ensure ethical treatment of human research subjects, known as the Common Rule, which is now codified in Part 46 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”

Do you not understand the difference between regulations and laws? When you’re arrested, it is for violating a law, not a regulation.

[Vaduz]

AMEN

[bert]

Paul is having a wet dream

[Lockbox]

I would assume if a person was a Federal employee, broke a Federal regulation which lead to the death of thousands, then maybe the law covering negligent homicide may apply. But I’m not a lawyer…..

[whyilovetexas111]

He seems to be a very progressive democrat and they take care of their own, it would seem.

[DugwayDuke]

Lockbox wrote: “I would assume if a person was a Federal employee, broke a Federal regulation which lead to the death of thousands, then maybe the law covering negligent homicide may apply. But I’m not a lawyer…..”

The charge would be negligent homicide, not breaking a federal regulation.

[Lockbox]

😊