Posted on 01/22/2022 1:28:43 PM PST by ransomnote
[H/T Little Jeremiah]
(LifeSiteNews) – Netflix reality TV star Maya Vander told her fans last week of her devastating grief after she delivered a stillborn baby at 38 weeks of pregnancy December 9.
“Yesterday was the hardest day of my life,” Vander, 39, posted on Instagram, with a picture of new baby clothes in a memory box she was taking home from hospital instead of her baby boy. “I always heard of it but never imagined I’ll be part of the statistics.”
Vander, a Beverly Hills real estate agent who stars on the show “Selling Sunset,” had posted a photo of herself in November from a pregnancy shoot and looked the picture of health. Described as “fully vaccinated,” by US magazine, Vander has two other children: Aiden, two, and daughter Elle, one.
After her loss, she wrote in Insider magazine that she had felt less movement from the baby a few days before she learned her baby had died and also that her husband and two children were COVID-positive, although she had tested negative. She said the baby, who was “perfect” and weighed seven pounds and four ounces, would be autopsied.
There was a flurry of sympathetic news coverage about Vander’s loss, but not one article dared to ask burning questions: did COVID shots during her pregnancy have something to do with this baby’s death? Or did COVID have something to do with it, and the COVID shots failed?
Data Pfizer didn’t want you to see
When a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency asked Pfizer to share the raw data from their COVID vaccine trials and post-marketing surveillance that was used to license the injection, the pharma giant linked up with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to refuse the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. In fact, the FDA (meant to serve and protect public health) hired Justice Department lawyers and went to court to shield the pharmaceutical giant from having to reveal its data – for 55 years. That’s right. The FDA and Pfizer did not want anyone to see the numbers behind their COVID vaccine until 2076.
Fortunately, a judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests. Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. It reveals that the drug behemoth received more than 150,000 serious adverse event reports within three months of rolling out its COVID shot, but here we will focus on Table 6 of the data on pregnant and lactating women who received the shots in the first few months of the rollout, which began December 11. Most of these women would have been healthcare workers because that was who the first rounds of shots went to. As the clinical trials preceding the rollout excluded pregnant women, these would have been the first pregnant and lactating women to have ever received the vaccines.
Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”
This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.
Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.
Pfizer’s report states that there were five pregnancies with “outcome pending” as well as the 238 with “no outcome provided.” But 32 minus 28 equals four, not five.
Because of this confusion, I called Pfizer and emailed questions to their media rep. Were 28 of 32 known pregnancy outcomes actually fatal in the first 10 weeks that the vaccine became available, as their report suggests? That’s an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate? And only one pregnancy outcome was “normal”? Please correct me if I’m wrong about this.
No reply.
The FDA would have had these data in their hands by the end of April. Maybe this is why they wanted to hide it for 55 years?
MORE AT THE LINK.....
she did get the pfizer shot back in May 2021 and her doc
“Recommended” the booster since she is an art teacher but
she won’t be taking it because of horror stories like this
***********
She is a teacher so I assume she drives to school daily?
If so what are the numbers regarding injury/death in auto
accidents? May be worth looking up.
2021
“MUTANT MICE Dr Fauci agency funded Frankenstein research that saw aborted babies’ body parts grafted to MICE to grow hair and organs”
https://www.the-sun.com/news/3353606/dr-anthony-fauci-agency-funded-aborted-baby-parts-experiments/
CNN, MSNBC, Twitter, etc, all say... “Yawn”.
she works from home now..so no she wont be getting the shot..ever..sucks that she already got the original vaccine but hoping that since it was may of last yr it wont cause any lasting issues
did I SAY ban him or that he not voice his opinion? learn to read.
A small price to pay for Bill Gates’ democidal wet dream.
“...FR pro-vax dokters...”
Anybody heard from that pro-vax fraudulent “gas_dr” recently? He was prolific for awhile on FR spouting all sorts of “expertise” and advice for the past 2 years but I ain’t seen hide nor hair of him in a couple months.
Guy at work boasted about getting two shots and a booster as soon as they were available. Now he has cancer. His daughter got the shots and had a still borne baby at 6 months. But still she got a booster at his recommendation and is desperately trying to get pregnant again.
Can’t fix stupid.
The study will focus on the tendency of spike proteins to accumulate, disrupt and cause dysfunction leading to infertility.
There are similar studies that will be wrapping up soon. I will be concerned…outraged if I don’t see results by March.
Nope but he’s got the right to voice his opinion. So he got
a rise out of you and most likely has a smile on his face.
I’d say he succeeded and accomplished his goal.
my smile’s bigger
One usually shows and makes some smart comment about him and his wife. Never on topic.
Its been out there quite awhile the shots can do this. Amazes me people are so ignorant by not researching before putting something they are told is experimental.
Do you get paid by the comment?
Yep, pay is good. Try to get on board.
You forgot the /s.
No. I did not.
Thank you for that information.
She tested negative for wu-flu.
The Sacklers are going to pay roughly $4.3 billion, give up ownership of Purdue Pharma, but they'll admit no wrongdoing, keep most of their wealth and opioid lawsuits against them will now be blocked.
https://www.gpb.org/news/2021/09/02/the-sacklers-who-made-billions-oxycontin-win-immunity-opioid-lawsuits
...FR pro-vax dokters...
_____________________
Haven’t seen them on these threads in a while and I do manage to scroll thru every few days or so.
Haven’t seen the ones embarrassed by posting injury reports much, either. I wonder if, by the law of averages, they have now actually had some experience in their own circles with the side effects IRL.
It seems that Kozak guy (alleged doctor, pro-vax) has been lying low recently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.