Posted on 01/22/2022 1:28:43 PM PST by ransomnote
[H/T Little Jeremiah]
(LifeSiteNews) – Netflix reality TV star Maya Vander told her fans last week of her devastating grief after she delivered a stillborn baby at 38 weeks of pregnancy December 9.
“Yesterday was the hardest day of my life,” Vander, 39, posted on Instagram, with a picture of new baby clothes in a memory box she was taking home from hospital instead of her baby boy. “I always heard of it but never imagined I’ll be part of the statistics.”
Vander, a Beverly Hills real estate agent who stars on the show “Selling Sunset,” had posted a photo of herself in November from a pregnancy shoot and looked the picture of health. Described as “fully vaccinated,” by US magazine, Vander has two other children: Aiden, two, and daughter Elle, one.
After her loss, she wrote in Insider magazine that she had felt less movement from the baby a few days before she learned her baby had died and also that her husband and two children were COVID-positive, although she had tested negative. She said the baby, who was “perfect” and weighed seven pounds and four ounces, would be autopsied.
There was a flurry of sympathetic news coverage about Vander’s loss, but not one article dared to ask burning questions: did COVID shots during her pregnancy have something to do with this baby’s death? Or did COVID have something to do with it, and the COVID shots failed?
Data Pfizer didn’t want you to see
When a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency asked Pfizer to share the raw data from their COVID vaccine trials and post-marketing surveillance that was used to license the injection, the pharma giant linked up with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to refuse the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. In fact, the FDA (meant to serve and protect public health) hired Justice Department lawyers and went to court to shield the pharmaceutical giant from having to reveal its data – for 55 years. That’s right. The FDA and Pfizer did not want anyone to see the numbers behind their COVID vaccine until 2076.
Fortunately, a judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests. Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. It reveals that the drug behemoth received more than 150,000 serious adverse event reports within three months of rolling out its COVID shot, but here we will focus on Table 6 of the data on pregnant and lactating women who received the shots in the first few months of the rollout, which began December 11. Most of these women would have been healthcare workers because that was who the first rounds of shots went to. As the clinical trials preceding the rollout excluded pregnant women, these would have been the first pregnant and lactating women to have ever received the vaccines.
Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”
This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.
Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.
Pfizer’s report states that there were five pregnancies with “outcome pending” as well as the 238 with “no outcome provided.” But 32 minus 28 equals four, not five.
Because of this confusion, I called Pfizer and emailed questions to their media rep. Were 28 of 32 known pregnancy outcomes actually fatal in the first 10 weeks that the vaccine became available, as their report suggests? That’s an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate? And only one pregnancy outcome was “normal”? Please correct me if I’m wrong about this.
No reply.
The FDA would have had these data in their hands by the end of April. Maybe this is why they wanted to hide it for 55 years?
MORE AT THE LINK.....
She’ll say whatever pays her most likely.
****************************
Yeah, okay.
That’s a completely ridiculous statement.
See, see!! The jab worked!!
Now where’s muh free burgers.
he’s a dipshit
Very well said Thank you
he’s a dipshit
****************************
Yep, I’ll ignore him now.
Any record of the number of still born births annually and cause?
he’s a dipshit
**********
Well are dipshits banned from posting on FR
and voicing their opinion?
I’m convinced that, not only will the vaccine cause miscarriages in those that are vaccinated, it will also cause miscarriages in un-vaccinated women who are in close contact with those that are.
I know two young women who were pregnant and decided not to get vaccinated. However, both worked in environments where everyone else got the shot at about the same time (work sponsored vaccine clinic). Both women then miscarried within a week or so.
Why respond to that jack-ass?
He lives only to get a response.
Don’t give him the satisfaction.
Nope, but then again there is no need to give that jack-ass what he wants, a reaction.
Actual relevant questions? Don’t get much of that here :).
I have seen a few articles about the post ‘vax’ IVF failure rate skyrocketing.
I am not sure there is enough info on that yet.
the only study I see is this limited one funded by the nih
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116639/
You forgot the /s.
Think how intertwined all Bid Medicine is with Big Pharma.
Just horrible which is why I we told my brother’s wife who is currently 24 weeks pregnant to NOT get the vaccine booster..she did get the pfizer shot back in May 2021 and her doc “Recommended” the booster since she is an art teacher but she wont be taking it because of horror stories like this
They aren't giving informed consent. They won't be sharing the possible danger to others or the unborn.
From Page 67-68 of the Pfizer protocols:
Page 67
“8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy
An EDP occurs if:
• A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing
study intervention.
• A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a
female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
• A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to
study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of
environmental exposure during pregnancy:
• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after
having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.”
PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines)
Protocol C4591001
Page 68
• A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study
intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to
or around the time of conception.”
www.TheCovidBlog.com
for more cases
Have you watched “Dopesick” on Hulu? Be sure to watch it. It’s about Purdue Pharma, Oxycontin, the FDA, and the DEA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.