Posted on 01/04/2022 4:12:02 PM PST by MtnClimber
I'm expecting one of the largest mainstream media pivots in history in 2022, catalyzed by capitalism and common sense.
A couple of things all happened together over the last 48 hours.
First, I came up with the idea of writing 100 predictions for the year 2022 – a blog post that I might still wind up finishing at some point. And second, I listened to the Joe Rogan Experience podcast interview of mRNA inventor Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., hours after the doctor was banned from Twitter for having opinions on Covid that stood at odds with the mainstream narrative.
The opinions that Malone echoed during his Rogan appearance included, but were not limited to:
-Calling the government “out of control” and “lawless” in their Covid response
-Stating mandates of “experimental” vaccines are “explicitly illegal”
-Noting that India had success in treating Covid early with drugs like ivermectin
-Saying “half a million” excess deaths have occurred due to government actions
-Arguing those with natural immunity have higher risk of vaccine adverse events
-Alleging that people are living through a mass formation psychosis
I’m not going to rehash all of the doctor’s points about Covid, but instead will say that I believe he made an extraordinary amount of thoughtful points that the mainstream media and “big tech” are too scared (and/or too stupid) to touch on themselves.
You can watch clips and read a full writeup of Malone’s interview here and read a detailed thread of the interview here.
Among the 100 predictions I was going to make in my blog post was going to be calling for a drastic shift in the mainstream media in the coming year. Instead of 100 predictions, I decided to instead write this piece.
It was a great interview that Joe Rogan had with Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. It is over 3 hours, but well worth it, even if you watch it a bit at a time. A link is in this article at the source link.
Joe Rogan gets about 11 million viewers per episode. CNN Primetime gets far less than a tenth of that. He has the audience.
What exactly makes Dr Malone “the mRNA inventor”?
Enter Joe Rogan and bid adieu to the MSM ossified relics.
Dr. Malone is an outstanding communicator.
Dr Malone worked on Army research that developed the mRNA technology, not the mRNA application to COVID.
Al Gore invented the internet just like Malone invented mRNA.
By the way, even Dr. Malone has never made as nonsensical a claim as to have “invented” mRNA. The people who write these articles don’t have a clue what they are talking about (at best).
Why does anyone take the garbage on substack seriously? How much more ridiculous can you get?
Intentional misinterpretations of what he has said.
“Intentional misinterpretations of what he has said.”
He was the one that was saying it for a long time, or at least not discouraging others from saying it.
I think he’s backed off from that recently since he’s gotten more attention.
Malone made an important contribution early on. So did a lot of others without whom mRNA would not have advanced. And of course Malone’s early paper includes two co-authors, whom he somehow fails to ever mention.
“Al Gore invented the internet just like Malone invented mRNA.”
Good call.
“By the way, even Dr. Malone has never made as nonsensical a claim as to have “invented” mRNA”
I think he says “inventor of mRNA technology”. Whichever version he rolls with it’s an exaggeration and his peers don’t back him up. He could be hoping for Nobel recognition or patent claims. Who knows. His new fan club may end up disappointed.
It was excellent as was the interview with Dr. Peter McCullough.
He threatens the bottom line. I get it. We all have to fill our rice bowls.
I would argue Project Veritas is in the mix as well. They have CNN on their heels.
As best I could understand, he had a major hand in the discovery of early RNA technology which ultimately made the vaccines a possibility. I read awhile back that the scientist who developed the Moderna vaccine gave him some credit in one of her interviews.
I dunno about an Army connection. His first paper, co-authored with Felgner and Verma in 1989, is the one that puts him on the map. Salk Institute. He may well have had more to do with the paper than his co-authors. This is where his “inventor” claim originates:
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/86/16/6077.full.pdf
Lose.
Losing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.