Posted on 12/18/2021 3:11:54 PM PST by ransomnote
Someone commented that the article I posted, Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? (freerepublic.com), has no basis in fact and and is sensationalized to create fear. They wanted to see proof.
I exported data from the CDC's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database which indicates that, like reports of deaths to VAERS, the Covid 'vaccines' have far more reports of adverse events (i.e., blindness) than other all other vaccines.
Consider that the target audience for influenza vaccines is around 250 million per year. After years of flu vaccine administration, there are a total of 233 reports of blindness following influenza vaccination.
Note other vaccines commonly given to all school children, every year (e.g., Measles) have relatively few reports of blindness post vaccination (e.g., 51 for Measles) compared with the Covid 'vaccine', which has 1615 reports of blindness post 'vaccine' in one year of administration.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. Note that many vaccines have zero reports of blindness post vaccination and are not shown in the table below.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
Search Term: "BLINDNESS"
VACCINE TYPE COUNT PERCENTAGE
| Anthrax | 38 | 1.47% |
| COVID-19 | 1,615 | 62.55% |
| Diphtheria | 138 | 5.34% |
| Encephalitis | 2 | 0.08% |
| Haemophilus | 34 | 1.32% |
| Hepatitis A | 61 | 2.36% |
| Hepatitis B | 157 | 6.08% |
| HPV | 217 | 8.4% |
| Influenza | 233 | 9.02% |
| Lyme | 19 | 0.74% |
| Measles | 51 | 1.98% |
| Meningitis | 91 | 3.52% |
| Mumps | 46 | 1.78% |
| Pertussis | 118 | 4.57% |
| Pneumonia | 51 | 1.98% |
| Polio | 59 | 2.29% |
| Rabies | 11 | 0.43% |
| Rotavirus | 6 | 0.23% |
| Rubella | 51 | 1.98% |
| Shingles | 158 | 6.12% |
| Smallpox | 8 | 0.31% |
| Tetanus | 133 | 5.15% |
| Tetanus | 8 | 0.31% |
| Typhoid | 11 | 0.43% |
| Varicella | 25 | 0.97% |
| Yellow Fever | 10 | 0.39% |
Spot the Covid "vaccine" in the chart below, which shows the number of reports of blindness all vaccines published to VAERS since 1990. It's the only tall bar.
The top four lines of the following table breaks down reports of blindness following Covid 'vaccination' by manufacturer. Below it appear to be misclassified data that is not properly categorized in VAERS.
REPORTS OF BLINDNESS FOLLOWING COVID 'VACCINATION'
Every day the evidence piles up, yet some continue to behave as if Covid 'vaccines' have an impressive performance record with few, if any indications we should be concerned. They say posting articles on this topic is merely 'sensationalizing' or creating needless fear and pick apart verbiage to find fault with those pointing to the evidence.
How much evidence that the Covid gene therapy shots are harmful? We've been posting evidence daily - it shouldn't trigger anyone into angry denials at this point.
My choice of wording, and that of others, also creates great angst because some have decided we are stating that 100% of every report of blindness is caused by the Covid 'vaccines'. If I meant 100% of every report indicates a causal relationship, I would state 100% of every report.
Clearly, Covid 'vaccines' are the subject of endless coincidences. The CDC and its loyal advocates on Free Republic say there's nothing to see here, and chastises any who discuss this content, reminding them that the relationship cannot be said to be causal (and note, the CDC did not specify '100%' either).
However, Steve Kirsch and his team presented a report to the FDA Advisory panel (ACIP) in which Kirsch points out that's a myth. The FDA panel was unable to refute the content of the report and ended the meeting by declining to recommend a booster dose.
"For the current COVID vaccines, our team is extremely confident that we can meet all the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality using VAERS analysis alone. Will our statisticians and VAERS experts be permitted to meet with any ACIP members to discuss the data?
For example, it is well established that a clear dose dependency relationship can be used to satisfy one of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Because two of the vaccines are multi-dose vaccines, a Dose 1/Dose 2 ratio analysis shows a very clear signal. Sadly, this type of analysis is currently being completely ignored by the CDC."
ransomnote: VAERS is a safety signal. Seeing disproportionate results or even having more than 50 reports of death would ordinarily result in having the product pulled off the market to examine them for mechanisms of harm/safety. None of the 'usual suspects' who vigorously ridicule negative reports about the vaccine express any desire for the CDC/NIH/Fauci et. al. to investigate these safety signals, much less discuss them with the medical community, or accept Steve Kirsch's million dollar offer to debate the details with his team.
Actually and based on what I read, you are the guy who provides highly misleading non scientific information and promote conspiracy theories.
VAERS contains a fraction of actual events. The rate is far higher. Deaths and injuries - VAERS is just a drop in the bucket of the actual numbers.
No one is in a position to win a legal case against the weaponized Federal Government - it doesn’t matter how many people they kill. The Feds will just use limitless tax dollars and paid off ‘experts’ to keep the killing going.
There’s a reason that Anthony Fauci is paid more than the President of the United States. Fauci is key to China’s overthrow efforts.
“Goofball claims”
1) I didn’t claim blindness, only vaccine adverse affects.
2) “Do you have any training in medical research?”
Yes, actually I do. I have taken college courses in
many pertinent areas.
3) I have had every major vaccine known to mankind for
childhood diseases, over seas deployment, foreign
government mandate, medical responder, and optional I
thought I needed.
4) My medical conditions as a result of the vaxxine are
documented by many medical providers I have been to.
The real question is why you feel the government and big pharma need your support.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. , bhl wrote: |
When you can’t provide evidence of your goofball claims, you say I’m drinking Kool Aid. Do you have any training in medical research? According to the table, the odds of blindness with 4+ billion doses given is 2.5e-7. The vaccine has plenty of shortcomings, and many side effects, but causing actual blindness is not one of them. Here is a report of one person reporting an eye issue after a 2nd dose. : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176659/ |
The table contains a tiny fraction of the actual number of adverse events. The CDC wanted it that way, that's why they created a second database which only CDC staff could access and gave all vaccinated persons a free phone app to use to report side effect. Then, the CDC decide which records to post, when it wants to post them. Then, they punish doctors who state their medical opinion that the vaccine caused harm. Then they play games with what they consider 'vaccinated'. There's every effort at covering their tracks.
Your one case report is laughable - so many have died post 'vaccination', 50% of deaths occur within 48 hours of 'vaccination', and with deception/lies from the CDC,we'll never know how many went blind. *smh*
You are pretending that 1600 reports of blindness for Covid shots are 'normal' given the average is far lower. At least 60 vaccines had zero reports of blindness, and Covid reports per shots dwarf that of influenza vaccines given annually.
VAERS data is for the USA. There are about 333 million people in the USA. If every person in the country had a two shot vaccine, and then the booster, that would only account for less than 1 billion vaccine doses. And we know that many people have not had any vaccine, and many people have not had a booster. So fewer than 700 million doses of vaccines have probably been administered in the USA.
Why did you pick a number ten times higher? Is it just a Saturday night math error, or are you working for Pfizer?
Why are you using the wrong number of doses? Do you really think the 333 million people living in the USA received 7 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses? That's 21 doses per person, including the children.
Is that some kind of common core math?
How many of that “9 billion” were saline shots. We know for a fact they were “accidentally” giving them
You must have gotten a pay raise. That really looked stupid. How big is that rock you live under anyway?
I don’t understand the not stopping things when the VEARS deaths hit 20 or 25. Why the change? Why the acceptance of this many?
I’m non-GMO, baby! 100% organic!
Are you really that freaking stupid?
Including ransomnote so he can see how much of sheep you are!!!
Pureblood, baby!!!
Well done. Amazing how many things can make you go blind:
Diet Soda Linked to Risk for Diabetic Blindness
https://www.webmd.com/diabetes/news/20190108/diet-soda-linked-to-risk-for-diabetic-blindness
Aspirin Linked to Blinding Eye Disease
https://www.webmd.com/eye-health/news/20130118/aspirin-blinding-eye-disease
Incidence of blindness in a population of rheumatic patients treated with hydroxychloroquine
https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/3/1/rkz009/5466462
Hmm. So if you take HCQ, ivermectin and aspirin and wash it down with diet soda, you’re sure to go blind.
But until that is substantiated by a reputable source then it will just be labelled false.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Harvard study is what I believe is being referred to.
p
Or fully retarded. I choose all of the above.
Just remember. When you talk to Dogway Duke, you're talking to a paid professional.
#ChemicalWeaponsRepresentative
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.