Source – Page 15
Posted on 12/17/2021 10:54:56 AM PST by ransomnote
Since the first Covid-19 vaccine was authorised for use in the United Kingdom, and administered on the 8th December 2020, there have been hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. But there is one particular adverse reaction which is both concerning and strange, and the number of people suffering from it is increasing by the week – Blindness.
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme analysis print for the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab shows that since the first jab was administered on the 9th December 2020, and up to December 8th 2021, 132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection. Another 6 people have also reported central vision loss, whilst a further 3 people have reported sudden visual loss.
Fifteen people have also reported an adverse reaction known as ‘blindness transient’ due to the Pfizer vaccine. This is where a person suffers visual disturbance or loss of sight in one eye for seconds or minutes at a time. And a further six people have reported an adverse reaction known as ‘unilateral blindness’. This is where a person is blind or has extremely poor vision in one eye.
In total there have been 6,682 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab as of 8th Dec 21.
The AstraZeneca viral vector injection has also caused hundreds of people to go blind. As of December 8th the MHRA has received 306 reports of blindness, 3 reports of central vision loss, 5 reports of sudden visual loss, and 26 reports of blindness transient among 14,448 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the jab.
The Moderna mRNA injection, which was first administered in June and has the lowest number of injections administered in the UK, has also caused several people to suffer blindness.
As of 8th Dec 21 the MHRA have received 19 reports of blindness, and 34 reports of visual impairment as adverse reactions to the Moderna injection.
In all, when including adverse reactions reported where the brand of vaccine was not specified, there have been 22,060 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, with 461 of these reactions being complete blindness. Now, “fact-checkers” alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that “just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine”.
But what they’re not telling you is that it also doesn’t necessarily mean it is not due to the vaccine, and we imagine every single person who has reported an adverse reaction would disagree with the fact checkers and authorities attempts to play down these reports.
For instance one person who goes by the name of Louis has been documenting the story of his wife on Twitter since she had the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.
Unfortunately his wife went completely blind in her left eye and 30-60% blind in her right eye after having the AstraZeneca jab and the neurologist treating her, categorically told her not have the second dose.
As you can see the misery which the fact checkers are disregarding as “not necessarily the fault of the vaccine” is very real for the people who are reporting them. But why are the Covid vaccines causing people to go blind?
Well there is another extremely concerning adverse reaction that has been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme, one which has seen an astronomical increase in the number of reports in the past few weeks – stroke.
As of 8th Dec 21, the MHRA has received 652 reports of stroke due to the Pfizer mRNA injection, which is now the primary booster jab being administered to Brits. These reports include 14 reports of subarachnoid haemorrhage, which is an extremely rare type of stroke, 48 reports of cerebral haemorrhage, 55 reports of ischaemic stroke, and 414 reports of cerebrovascular accidents.
Sadly these 652 reported strokes have resulted in 47 deaths.
Unfortunately the AstraZeneca vaccine has also caused hundred of strokes. Up to 8th Dec 21 the MHRA has received 2,193 reports of stroke as adverse reactions to the jab resulting in 154 deaths. The 2,193 strokes include 180 cerebral haemorrhages, 114 subarachnoid haemorrhages (supposed to be rare), 156 ischaemic strokes, and a shocking 1,275 cerebrovascular accidents.
But what does this have to do with people going blind? Well this helpful fact sheet provided by the Stroke Foundation in Australia provides the answer as to why. According to the fact sheet around one-third of stroke survivors suffer visual loss, and most sadly never fully recover their vision.
The reason strokes cause blindness is that vision depends on a healthy eye to receive information and a healthy brain to process that information. The nerves in the eye travel from the eye through the brain to the occipital cortex at the back of the brain, allowing you to see.
Most strokes affect one side of the brain. Nerves from each eye travel together in the brain, so both eyes are affected. If the right side of your brain is damaged, the left side vision in each eye may be affected. It is rare for both sides of the brain to be affected by stroke. When it does happen, it can result in blindness.
So if you’ve been wondering how on earth the experimental Covid vaccines could cause a person to go blind, you now know why. It’s the vast amount of strokes the Covid injections are causing that is contributing to this devastating and life-changing adverse event. Strokes will not be the only contributing factor of course, but the numbers suggest they are most likely the main adverse reaction at fault.
With a national campaign to administer a third jab to millions of Brits within the space of a few weeks we dread to think how many more people will have to suffer the life debilitating condition of blindness due to an experimental injection that does not work and makes the recipient worse according to the UK Governments own data.
Thanks, great advise. If I could afford to, I would. BUT that idiot doc who killed Joan Rivers would have killed me too, as I’m as sensitive as JT was to anesthesia. Old doc in Chicago I went to for years told me I’d better not ever be in an accident, because they’d kill me trying to cure me. I had some stomach scan test in SF done by Dr Ostroff, head of Internal Med at UC Hospital in SF, rank one of the top guys. I told him to give me HALF as much anesthetic as he’d give anyone else. The minute the shot hit my arm, I knew it was too much. “You son of a.....I said as I went under.
Three hours late a team of nurses were standing over me slapping my arm, calling my name, and trying to wake me up. I came to a little bit and the first words out of my mouth was...Bitch.” Had to finish that sentence. They let me out and I drove home to Emeryville, across the SF Bay Bridge. Worst drive of my life...they should have kept me there another hour at least.
When I saw Ostroff again, I told him he should have given me half as much, and he said: “I did.”
I really have to fight for my life with all these SOBs.
Actually, my ophthalmologist in Seattle was rated top corneal transplant doc in the world. With a Japanese fellow in SF ranked a close second.
...........
Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. Yup, your very clever.
The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine.
There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise.
I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks.
I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here.
Unfortunately my father is having both ping and heart issues. Good friend is having heart and neurological issues. I hope you are clear. I really won’t be accepting if my dad gets worse. He got his booster and is getting worse. It’s not a joke. I know the boards are splintering us over the vax. Looks like me and my beautiful bride may be having job issues in late or post January but I’m really worried about my dad. I love him dearly. This is just so wrong. Mock all you want. I quit this argument/ discussion. It’s hitting home and I’m honestly worried. 6 months ago, I would have told you my dad would outlive me. (Long complicated health story ) and it no longer seems to be true. My guess is dad would rather me bury him than him bury me. Whatever. You don’t care. You see no evil in this….
I’m sad about it all. I’m also worried about my mom. It’s just not good. I also don’t think it’s necessary. Yet mom and dad decided on the vax + boosters on their own. Im still sad tonight. It’s looking bad.
Mock all you want. They have been brainwashed.
I hope you have no issues. Somewhere i am sure a son or daughter hopes you the best and would be devastated on a early departure.
Mock away.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, semimojo quoted: |
| Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. semimojo wrote: The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine. ransomnote wrote: It doesn't have to be 'every event' before it matters. VAERS is a safety signal and then your kind insists we all ignore the signal completely. The annual average in vaers prior to Covid bioweapons ('vaccines') was 150 persons dying for about every 250 million vaccinations. No one suggested that all 150 persons (annually) were from whatever vaccines they were given - but it's important to track such information and look for unexplained changes. When the Covid 'vaccines' were under 90 million (late January 2021), there were already 1200 deaths recorded in VAERS post Covid 'vaccines'. Normally we don't have Covid 'vaccines' and the annual count would be 150, but Covid 'vaccines' added 1200 records of death. Any other product would be pulled off the market at 50 deaths. In late January, the vaccination program was still ramping up, and they didn't hesitate to force the vaccines on the public and ignore all safety signals. In the 30 year history of VAERS data collection,there was a total of roughly 10 thousand deaths reported to VAERS (not all directly related, and this would only be a small fraction of actual events as many are never reported to the CDC). Covid 'vaccines' racked up that amount in just 1 year, a rate of 30 times 'normal' reports, whether directly caused or not. Can you see why any experimental vaccine having about the same number of death reports in one year as the combination of all vaccines spanning a 30 year history just might matter? Just recently, we've learned that the Pfizer trial had 1200 deaths in 2 or 3 months. I think their phase III trial was 50,000. Are you capable of understsanding why this is a concern? How about the fact that 50% of Covid vaccine reports of death occur within 48 hours of 'vaccination'? I'm writing facts you will ignore, and the next lament/blame storming you do, you'll pretend I never wrote it, so you don't know it etc. semimojo wrote: There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise. ransomnote wrote: Your kind agonizes of flat numbers reported for VAERS as if your ox is being gored. I don't see assertions that every case is directly caused. Are you worried about the inference, rather than any statement? Well then why doesn't the inferance of horrific levels of unprecedented death and disabling injury re Covid 'vaccines' bother you, but the idea that some may interpret statements to mean 100% of every report in VAERS is causal. By the way, a causal argument is made by Steve Kirsch and his team: "Each and every symptom we looked at satisfies all the traditional Bradford-Hill causality criteria using both absolute rate elevation compared to baseline rates as well as Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 response disparities." You see, sometimes the CDC lies, and the CDC's insistance that there are no causal data, and that VAERS can't render causal data is just backside covering. But, that's Steve Kirsch's team; I haven't been saying every single case is directly a result and I haven't seen anyone else say it. What matters to you is that some of us are paying attention to a safety signal the CDC wants ignored. semimojo wrote: I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks. ransomnote wrote: Independent researchers, journalists and citizens have stepped into the void to get past the censors and it is KILLIN' your kind. You keep demanding we only cite what amounts to talking points and labeling anyone who gets past the censors as liars out for money. The CDC/NIH/FDA are growing wealthy on their patents on drugs paid for by taxpayer dollars, but that's not the kind of thing of which you disapprove. semimojo wrote: I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here. ransomnote wrote: And so ends semimojo's cryin'-in-his-beer because the board owner won't enact censorship rules which serve Fauci's interests. *yawn* |
So all this time your problem is you don't know what a safety signal is? Look it up - it doesn't mean every case is directly related. It means if unusual numbers show up, like those never seen before (*cough* Covid 'vaccines'*cough*) you respond to the safety signal by pausing and investigating. Instead - the CDC races to get as many people 'vaccinated' as possible, despite violations of human rights, Constitutional rights and the Nuremberg Code, before enough of the truth breaks through the media blackout on such information.
So, you don't know what 'lie' means either? Well now, I guess that explains your posts...
See my links in reply #47.
I have ophthalmic issues. My docs have never mentioned these risks to me.
Inflammatory optic neuropathy following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine: Description of two cases
Central retinal vein occlusion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report
Post Vaccination Optic Neuritis: Observations From the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
I see my eye doctor every six months. Or more often if needed.
My other docs are aware of the reason.
Not a peep about any risks from the vaxxes to my eyesight from any of them.
Not. A. Word.
I know a friend the suddenly contracted retinitis after getting the 2nd Pfizer vax.
I’m sorry to hear that. How’s your friend doing?
WARNING: If you click on the link to take you to the full article, there are some VERY GRAPHIC pics and descriptions at the full link. The details are NOT for the squeamish.
Behçet’s-like adverse event or inaugural Behçet’s disease after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccination?
That poor patient's ophthalmic issues appear to be the least of it.
LOL
You are not alone: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3988541/posts?page=279#279
But there are, that's the point.
Theexpose.uk says:
"132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection."
That's only true if every adverse event is caused by the vaccine but as you've just said, they aren't.
That means theexpose.uk is lying.
And you keep posting those lies here.
I know what it is and I know theexpose.uk is lying when they say every case of blindness was caused by the vaccine.
You know it too.
I was thinking of VAERs when I responded but I see you’re posting on the UK site. What Steve Kirsch said, of VAERS, is true of the UK yellow card system -it technically does meet the criteria for causality established for statistics prior to Covid. It’s kind of a deflection/religion to insist that someone who’s fine until they are injected and then goes blind MUST BE ASSUMED TO BE UNRELATED or can’t say in an article it caused it (you know, this isn’t a court of law) until the UK Yellow Card system authorizes it.
Safety signals of epic proportions are intentionally being ignored and dismissed versus the Exposes generalized statement (they still didn’t say 100% causal, they just made a general statement you can’t live with).
Are there some cases caused by other factors? Well, will the Yellow Card system investigate and prove with evidence or should we just do what you say, “NOTHING TO SEE HERE! MOVE ALONG!”
While the expose says there is a relationship between injection and blindness - Yellow Card, you, and VAERS insist there isn’t. These statements seem equal in validity, until you look at the overall progress of biowarfare and the fact that the data meets statistical causality (see Steve Hirsch’s ACIP report).
And as I said before - you don’t want any attention paid to unprecedented levels of death and damage so you have little moral high ground upon which to pose while parsing the text and declaiming that generalizations about horrific violations of the Nuremberg Code are instead lies.
I know what it is and I know theexpose.uk is lying when they say every case of blindness was caused by the vaccine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They are generalizing about a genocidal holocaust, not lying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
