I was thinking of VAERs when I responded but I see you’re posting on the UK site. What Steve Kirsch said, of VAERS, is true of the UK yellow card system -it technically does meet the criteria for causality established for statistics prior to Covid. It’s kind of a deflection/religion to insist that someone who’s fine until they are injected and then goes blind MUST BE ASSUMED TO BE UNRELATED or can’t say in an article it caused it (you know, this isn’t a court of law) until the UK Yellow Card system authorizes it.
Safety signals of epic proportions are intentionally being ignored and dismissed versus the Exposes generalized statement (they still didn’t say 100% causal, they just made a general statement you can’t live with).
Are there some cases caused by other factors? Well, will the Yellow Card system investigate and prove with evidence or should we just do what you say, “NOTHING TO SEE HERE! MOVE ALONG!”
While the expose says there is a relationship between injection and blindness - Yellow Card, you, and VAERS insist there isn’t. These statements seem equal in validity, until you look at the overall progress of biowarfare and the fact that the data meets statistical causality (see Steve Hirsch’s ACIP report).
And as I said before - you don’t want any attention paid to unprecedented levels of death and damage so you have little moral high ground upon which to pose while parsing the text and declaiming that generalizations about horrific violations of the Nuremberg Code are instead lies.
Straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship but I want to see evidence.
Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.