Straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship but I want to see evidence.
Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.
Did you get a chance to go to ant if the links I posted?
Ophthalmic issues are occurring post-vaxxing.
Semimojo: straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship, but I want to see evidence.
ransomnote: Then you need a translator to help us understand that when you claim the Expose is lying and I'm posting lies, what you really mean is that you want to see evidence.
Semimojo: Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
ransomnote: Check the thread I posted at the bottom of this post.
You ignore the extensive proof it's killing people in unprecedented numbers, I'm certain it's a waste of my time for me to post more proof you'll ignore, but I posted it for others.
Your fixation on parsing text in order to protect the 'good reputation of vaccines' when 10 year olds are having heart attacks and athletes are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers is not a good look.
Semimojo: Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
ransomnote: The Expose knows, as I do, that a general statement does not rule out all exceptions. We have ample data to be well versed in the deaths/debilitating injuries and you pretend we dont as if the 'vaccines' are a new novelty and we must wait for more data, more proof.
How much proof is enough? NEVER ENOUGH in your book. You want to parse the wording on an article about eye damage, while the crimes against humanity continue without any objection from you. The Expose made a generalize statement which you alone insist should be translated to mean 100%. You are going to call everyone liars and then hold your breath until they prove Covid vaccines are harmful, again?
Semimojo: Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
ransomnote: I would say frightening and horrifying are accurate terms for the killing and maiming taking place right before your eyes, while you translate articles for us to mean different things.
Semimojo:And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.
ransomnote: I'm explaining word meanings to you. How I wish you cared about what Fauci/CDC says and does as people die and suffer around us. But, you don't. What Fauci/CDC says and does, what happens to children with strokes and blood clots - you don't have any requests they proof anything the CDC/Fauci and others say about the vaccines. No proof needed - those traitors' assertions are sufficient for you. The key point, the center of focus for you, is parsing text in article like The Expose. Priorities.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation.
Medalerts.org ^ | 12/18/2021 | vanity
Posted on 12/18/2021, 3:11:54 PM by ransomnote
“Can someone show there’s a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?”
That’s exactly why there needs to be a large control group of unvaccinated people.
I don’t see anybody in the medical community pointing this out. It Fraudci really was a man of science he would be insisting on a large control group in each country.